Advanced Search Results

Capt. Parveen Rawat and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 420 and 467; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52F and 69; ;Army (Amendment) Act, 1987; ;Army Regulations; ;Navy Act; ;Air Force Act - Section 176; ;Army Courts and Criminal Courts Rules; ;Court-martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3, 4, 5 and 6; ;Criminal Procedusre Code , Svt. 1989 - Sections 1, 1(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 167, 428, 475, 549 and 561A; ;Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Army Rules

of the Supreme Court observed as follows:The relevant chapters of the Army Act, the Navy Act and the Air Force Act embody a completely self-contained comprehensive Code specifying the various offences under those Acts and prescribing the procedure for … to be involved in the scam and consequently G.O.C. 14 Corps directed initiation , of action under Army Act 1950 against them for various acts of omission and commission punishable under Army Act. Pursuant to his directions petitioners … the provisions of the Code inapplicable in respect of all matters covered by such special law. Inasmuch as Section 176 of the Act specifically deals with the topic of the date of commencement of the sentences of imprisonment,

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

of sentence cannot be applied to a person convicted under Courts-Martial. The Supreme Court observed that inasmuch as Section 176 of the Army Act (sic. 167 of the Army Act) deals with the topic as to the date … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

Piara Singh Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 176

Reported in : AIR1958P& H141; 1958CriLJ673

v. Employees of the Bharat Bank Ltd, AIR 1950 SC 188 (M) to support the argument that … the Criminal Procedure Code.He relies simply on the case reported as Advocate General, Burma v. Maung Chit Maung AIR 1940 Rang 68 (D) where a Division Benchof the Burma High Court held that the expression ''Subordinate Court' … unnatural death, or to allay any unfounded suspicion, or to put In force the law against a particular Individual or merely to gain information which … reply. As a result of this encounter the three dacoits were killed. A Magistrate held an enquiry under Section 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which was undertaken immediately to enquire into the cause of the death … C.J.1. By this petition under Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the petitioner prays that S. Par-tap Singh Kairon, Chief Minister, Punjab, should

F.R. Jesuratnam Vs. Chief of Air Staff and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 164; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 428

Reported in : 1976CriLJ65; ILR1975Delhi330

one of us (V. D. Misra, J.) is 'whether a person undergoing imprisonment after being convicted under the Air Force Act- 1950, can be allowed to set off the period of pre-trial detention against the sentence of imprisonment ?'(2) F.R. … prisoners or persons to earn by special industry and good conduct, remission of a portion of the sentence. Section 176 of the Act. however, provides that rules made under section 175 shall not authorise corporal punishment to be

N. Sivasubramanian Versus Government of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was convened by the Chief Engineer Jaipur Zone and a Staff Court of Inquiry (C of I) by Air Force authorities were held in this case. It was followed by a Departmental Board of Officers under the Chief … General Court Martial could not be conducted since the same is barred under Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950. The delay would vitiate proceedings. The petitioner would place his reliance on the following dictums: i) AIR 1990 … the following dictums: i) AIR 1990 SC 1308 ii) 1997 (1) Supreme 176 and iii) 1998 (2) CLR 956. (Krishna v TWAD) 2(h) The respondents

Niraj Vikas Pabale and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Panchayat

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayat Act,1958 - Section 52, 142, 137, 180(2), 45; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats And Industrial Townships Act ; Regulation of Buildings Rules,1967 ; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rule 2A; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 21; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Section 51 (3), 323; Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227, 21

show how Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with such problem. In AIR 1950 S.C. 27 (A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras), manner of achieving … Chief Justice dated 30/10/2007 accepting it to be PIL is urged to be void. (1992)1 SCC 534-(para 19)- AIR 1992 SC 1555-(Shrisht Dhawan (Smt) v. Shaw Bros.),is cited for this. (1993) 2 SCC 507 (para 18)-(Chiranjilal Shrilal … adopt and in absence of order U/Section 323(3), it has no statutory force. Without prejudice, bye-laws 2.11,2.21,2.29 are read out to urge that Hostel is … of the 1958 Act, he points out entry 44 in Schedule-I and then Rule making power contained in Section 176 thereof to urge that Extension Rules can not apply and Respondents have not violated its Rule 7. In

Hulas Kunwar Vs. Allahabad Bank Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 7, 8, 9, 176 and 177; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 114

Reported in : AIR1958Cal644

47 Ind App 17: (AIR 1920 PC 61) (A); Bata Krishna Pramanik v. Bhowanipore Banking Corporation Ltd. : AIR1932Cal521 ; Gaddarmal v. Tata Industrial Bank. : AIR1927All407 and Bruce v. Hunter, (1813) 3 Camp 467 (D). The … It also seems to me that the notice dated 12-5-49 spent its force as soon as the Bank by its letter dated 11-8-49 (Ex, 4 … the plaintiff's account from December, 1942 to February 1950 -- Ex. 14. The entries in these Pass … of hypothecation and is not 'a reasonable notice of the sale' which is required to be given by Section 176. Relying upon the provisions of Section 177 it is argued that the notice contemplated by Section 176 must … be a proposal, as defined by S. 2(1) of the Indian Contract Act; because it does not signify to the Constituent the intention of the

Property Owners Association Vs. State Of Maharashtra .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for public purpose, and shall include the following purposes, namely:- (a) for strategic purposes relating to naval, military, air force, and armed forces of the Union, including central paramilitary forces or any work vital to national security or … West Bengal vs. Anwar Ali Sarkar, AIR1952SC75(“Anwar Ali Sarkar”), this Court struck down the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950, holding that it violated Article 14 of the Constitution. Vivian Bose J.in a separate judgment stated that provisions … said amendment, Civil Appeal No.1012 of 2002 Etc. Page 5 of 139 Section - 1A was also inserted in that Act and it contains a

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Chand Beli Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1858 - Sections 65; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 32(2), 176(1) and 240; Constitution of India - Articles 310, 310(1) and 311; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1955P& H166

Section 176(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935.20. In -- 'R. Venkata Rao v. Secy, of State', AIR 1937 P. C. 31 (A), Lord Roche construing Section 32(2) of the Government of India Act, 1919, said: … is common ground that the suit is not expressly barred by any enactment for the time being in force. In these circumstances the question that arises for decision is whether the cognizance of Civil Suit No. 81 … Harnam Singh, J.1. In Civil Suit No. 81 of 1950 Shri Ram Chand sought declaration to the effect that his discharge from

Seth Srenikbhai Kasturbhai and ors. Etc. Vs. Seth Chandulal Kasturchan ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 105 and 115 - Order 1, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rules 15 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 27, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25, 26, 27, 31A and 226; Validation Act, 1969; Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 - Sections 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 20, 22 and 23; Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 13 and 14(3); Forest Act - Sections 29

is found from the records but after Zamindari Abolition Act coming into force of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 there was a notification on 2-5-1953 by the Governor of Bihar Vide Notification No. 955/LR/ZAN/ under Section 3(1) … maintained in the Privy Council which is reported in AIR 1933 PC 176. Then Digambers came up with Suit No. 256 of 1920 best known … before the Privy Council by both the parties and the judgment of the Privy Council is reported in AIR 1926 PC 13. As regards 20 tonks and shrines of Gautam Swami, it was held by the Privy