Advanced Search Results

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5), 77(2), 166, 166(1) and 226; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4), 7 and 10; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(8)

Reported in : AIR1965P& H270

been charged for purposes of detention he could have been placed for trial before a court-martial under the AIR Force Act, 1950 or he could nave been tried under the Official Secrets Act 1923. It is pointed out that he … SC 531). The following observations at pages 477-478 (of SCR): (at p. 171 of AIR) of noteworthy.'It was held therein that he right of the … on 29th Novemeber, 1963 (vide order Annexure 'A').(3) On 4th Decemeber, 1963 the following order was made under Section 3(1)(a)(I) of the Act which must be reproduced in its entirety (Annexure 'B')'GOVERNMENT OF INIDA MINISTRY OF HOME

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1965CriLJ119

been charged for purposes of detention, he could have been placed for trial before a court-martial under the Air Force Act, 1950 or he could have been tried under the Official Secrets Act, 1923. It is pointed out that he … . The following observations at pages 477-478 (of SCR) : at p. 171 of AIR are noteworthy:It was held therein that the right of the … habeas corpus for the production of the body of Parkash Chandra, who is at present being detained under Section 3(1)(a)(i) of the Preventive Detection Act, 1950 (hereinafter called the Act) in the Central jail at Tehar, and

G.M. Thaker Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR1181]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … reply has been filed by respondent no.3 and 4 wherein at page 171 paragraph 8/2 the powers and functions of the members of the Petitioner … petitioner has challenged the order passed by respondent no.2 dated 4th December, 1995 while exercising the power under Section 10 read with Section 12 of the I.D. Act, 1947. The respondent No.2 has decided not to refer

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … which approved the following passage from an American decision in D.F. Marion v. Minnie Davis 55 American LR 171: The right to enjoyment of a private reputation, unassailed by malicious slander is of ancient origin, and is

H.H. Sir Sawai Man Singhji (Huf) Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1990)35ITD102(Delhi)

Rajendra Singh v. Union of India AIR 1970 SC 1946 at page 1950 to the effect that the distinction between recognition of Rulership and succession … referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sudhansusekhar Singh v. State of Orissa AIR 1961 SC 196 at page 198 for the proposition that the privileges guaranteed under Articles 4&5 (of the … Law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of the Act shall cease to have effect … HUF) that no partition of the bigger HUF took place and that since no order was passed under Section 171 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or under the corresponding provision under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the bigger HUF

Karuna Shankar Tripathi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Apprentice Act - Sections 7

Reported in : [1992(65)FLR203]; (1995)IIILLJ60All

but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the Police Service or as an … Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly 1986 (2) LLJ 171 (SC). 12. Before dealing with this aspect of the matter it is … contained in Apprentice Act, 1961, and they were 'workmen' within the meaning of word 'workmen' as defined in Section 2(z) of the U.P. Industrial-Disputes Act which reads as under: 'Workman' means any person including an apprentice employed

M.V. Valliappan and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 4, 5, 10(2), 44D, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 64(1), 143, 144, 147, 148, 156, 171, 171(1), 171(2), 171(3) and 171(9); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 265

Reported in : (1988)67CTR(Mad)289; [1988]170ITR238(Mad)

of India. The Supreme Court, in paragraph 14 of the judgment, has observed as follows (p. 276 of AIR 1980 SC) : 'It has however not been shown how it could be said that the Act has … already been recognised before section 171(9) of the Act has come into force is challenged on the ground that the income of the property which … the above-mentioned writ petitions which involve questions relating to the validity, scope and interpretation of the provisions of section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), which was introduced by the Finance (No.

Sarju Prasad Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 171(3), 174, 174(2), 200, 213(1) and 245; Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Samitis and Zila Parishads (Alpakalik Vyavastha) Adhyadesh, 1970 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1970All571

but clause l(b) of the Order provided that it would come into force at once. It appears that the proclamation had already been revoked by … from local bodies constituencies. The Parliament has made such a Law. There is the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The Parliament has specified certain local authorities in this State in the fourth Schedule to the Representation of … 59) and two Division Bench decisions of this Court in Vishwanath Agarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, : AIR1956All557 and Prem Narain Tandon v. State of Uttar Pradesh : AIR1960All205 . In view of these decisions we … to the provisions of the aforesaid bill, he is promulgating the Ordinance. Section 1 of the Ordinance specifies the title of the Ordinance. Section 2 … Ordinance is inconsistent with the provisions of Article 171(3)(a) of the Constitution. 7. The Ordinance is inconsistent

Nathmal Vs. the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Jaipur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Board of Revenue Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Board of Revenue Rules - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1952Raj46

heard by the second member as well.13. The learned Government Advocate relied on 'Khumaraswami Mudali v. Muniratna Mudali', AIR (19) 1932 Mad 529; 'Ratnamala Pattamahadevi v. Rayats of the Mandasa Zamindari', AIR (21) 1934 Mad 231, and … or by any other law or enactment for the time being in force in the whole or any part of Rajasthan and subject to any … agree with the Additional Commissioner and passed judgment on 22nd of September 1950 upholding the decision of the Nazim of Nimbahera. The operative portions of … 231, the case was under the Madras Estate Land Act (1908), and the appeal had been presented under Section 171 of that Act. The learned Judges referred to Sections 169, 170 and 172 of the Act in which

Dowager Rani Lalitha Kumari Devi and ors. Vs. the Raja of Vizianagaram ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82 and 97; Hindu Law; Madras Impartible Estates Act, 1904 - Sections 2(3), 3, 7 and 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1954Mad19

Matched in: Advocate M.C. Setalvad, Attorney General for ;D. Narasaraju, ;K.B. Krishnamurti and ;A.N. Rangaswami, Advs. in Nos. 106 and 107 of 1950 and ;M.C. Setalvad, Attorney General for ;C.A. Vaidyalingam, ;Alladi Kupp Adv. General, ;N. Rajagopala Iyengar, ;P. Rama Reddi, ;R. Ganapathi Aiyar, ;C.R. Pattabhiraman, ;S. Ramayya Nayak, ;M. Seshachalapathi, ;C.A. Vaidyalingam and ;P. Venkataswami, Advs. in Nos. 106 and 1