Advanced Search Results

Som Bahadur Gurung and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1986)2GLR1352

of F.R. Jesuratnam v. Chief of Air Staff 1976 Cri. L.J. 65. It was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 and there also a claim was made for set off under Section 428 for the period of pre-trial … of sentence of death, Section 167 provides for commencement of sentence of transportation or imprisonment, Sections 168 and 169 provide for execution of sentence of transportation and imprisonment, Section 174 provides for execution of sentence of fine.

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

consisted of “disinterested civilian judges,” and concluding that there was no reason for the Court to address an Air Force Captain’s argument that he was entitled to remain free from confinement pending appeal of his conviction by court-martial … 1950, see Act of May 5, 1950, ch. 169, 64 Stat. 107, and later amended, see, e.g., … the Articles of War were codified and re-enacted as the UCMJ in 1950, Congress determined to retain Article 15 because it had been “construed by … and mandamus petitions, Hamdan asserted that the military commission lacks authority to try him because (1) neither congressional Act nor the common law of war supports trial by this commission for conspiracy, an offense that, Hamdan says, … habeas corpus filed by … an alien detained … at Guantanamo Bay.” Section 1005(h)(2) provides that §§1005(e)(2) and (3)-which give the D. C. Circuit “exclusive”

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … with this case, it is necessary to note that in the 1950 Act, the Parliament has incorporated Section 169-A to avoid hardship to the persons convicted by the court-martial. The said provision is as follows: -“169-A. Period

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … with this case, it is necessary to note that in the 1950 Act, the Parliament has incorporated Section 169-A to avoid hardship to the persons convicted by the court-martial. The said provision is as follows: - “169-A.

Naib-subedar Sethurathinam Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be; or (b) if sentence is found to be excessive, illegal … have been grave violations such as pre-trial custody not being set off which is violative of Army Act Section 169-A, non-compliance of Supreme Courts order, not passing any order on the post-confirmation petition and illegally destroying the

Clinton Vs. Goldsmith

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES No. 98-347. Argued March 22, 1999-Decided May 17, 1999 Mter respondent Goldsmith, an Air Force major, defied an order by a superior officer to inform his sex partners that he was infected with … six months' confinement and served at least six months, the Air Force notified Goldsmith that it was taking action to drop him from the rolls. Goldsmith did not immediately contest that proposal, but rather petitioned the Court … specified sentences imposed by courts-martial. See Act of May 5, 1950, ch. 169, Art. 67(d), 64 Stat. 130. See also H. R. Rep. No. 491, … federal or state penitentiary or correctional institution, see Act of May 5, 1950, § 10, 64 Stat. 146. 2 Section 1161(b)(2) authorizes the President to

Union of India and Others Vs. Corporal A.K. Bakshi and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20, 22 and 189; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 17 and 18

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)422; AIR1996SC1368; JT1996(3)SC310; 1996(2)SCALE394; (1996)3SCC65; [1996]2SCR986; 1996(1)LC705(SC); (1996)2UPLBEC1273

order as to costs. Service - discharge - Sections 19, 20, 22, 169 and 189 of Air Force Act, 1950 and Rules 15 (2), 17 … punishment falling under Rule 18 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules').2. The Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to 'the Act'), in Chapter IV, makes provisions for conditions of service of every person subject … 'the Act'), in Chapter IV, makes provisions for conditions of service of every person subject to the Act. Section 18 prescribes that the every person subject to the Act shall hold office during the pleasure of the

R.K. Talukdar (ic-35161f Lt. Co.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Court in Ajit Singh, (supra), had been pressed into service to demonstrate that a person subject to the Air Force Act 1950, even on leave continues to be on active service. In view of the abandonment of the plea based … in S.R. Batra and Anr. v. Taruna Batra (Smt.) (2007) 3 SCC 169, has announced that any interpretation which leads to absurdity and chaos ought … learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate(s) No. 1, Guwahati, in GR Case No. 5424/04 drawing cognizance of the offences under Section 448/376/506 IPC against the petitioner as well as the order dated 28.6.2005 issuing a non-bailable warrant of arrest

Joy Kissen Arora Vs. Raghunath Prosad Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 97; ;Rent Act; ;Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act

Reported in : AIR1971Cal482

argued that the principle enunciated in the above decision applies with all force not only to tenants, but also to all persons deriving their title … Control (Temporary Provisions) Act 1948 or Section 13 (2) of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950, gives him no right to intervene in the proceedings between the landlord and the tenant: (See Thakurdas Pushparaj … Police help for effecting execution of the decree and observes at p. 169 (of 61 Cal WN) = (at p. 254 of AIR)-'On a petition … lawful, Mr. Chatterjee has referred to the following decisions:--1. Gayanath Ghosh v. Amulya Chandra Sarkar, reported in : AIR1957Cal252 ; 2. Sudhir Kumar Bose v. Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, reported in (1958) 62 Cal WN 176; 3. Debendranath

All India Crochet Lace Exporters Asscociation, Rep. by Its General Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(9), 2(10), 2(11), 2(18), 2(19), 2(21), 2(23), 3, 3(1), 4, 26(3), 37, 41, 64(4), 71(1) and 73(4); Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1987; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 7(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Andhra Pradesh Labour Welfare Fund Rules, 1988; Madras Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 2(16)

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD409; 2005(3)ALT737; (2005)IILLJ781AP

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, : (1962)ILLJ119SC where the Apex Court had explained the concept of employment under Section 2(1) of The Factories Act, 1948 wherein the Apex Court while dealing with Beedi factory and Beedi roller,