Advanced Search Results

G.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ485

justice and discipline demanded that he should be retried, the retrial had been ordered under the provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 in particular in the light of the provisions of Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner contends that … by the Court where the finding of sentence is sent back to it for revision under Section 159, Section 162 of the Act empowers the Central Government the Chief of the Air Staff or the Prescribed Authority (which

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

in that case under Section 165 of the Army Act, 1950. The Court took the view that while Section 162 of the Army Act expressly provided that the Chief of Army Staff may for reasons based on the … on the decision in Som Datt Datta v. Union of India : AIR 1969 SC 414 which decision is followed by the Constitution Bench in … Court directed remand in all the matters to the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) for rewriting the order, giving reasons in support of … Chief of the Army Staff confirming the proceedings of the court martial under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950 was illegal since no reason had been given in support of the order by the Chief of the

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … however, not the case inasmuch as she was not called as a witness to the Court of Inquiry. 162. We fail to understand as to why respondent No. 6 imposed the liability of calling Ms. ‘X as

Ajaib Singh Lehna Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 21, 22, 51, 227, 245 and 253; Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1952P& H309

a person's freedom of locomotion 'except in making a lawful arrest.'In 'Gopalan A. K. v. State of Madras', AIR' 1950 SC 27, Patanjali Sastri J,. observed as follows:'Article 19 seems to my mind to presupposethat the citizen … of India and the Government of Pakistan for the restoration of abducted persons. It is to remain in force till the 31st October, 1952. According to section 2 an 'abducted person' means a male child under the … Singh, J.51. In Criminal Writs Nos. 137, 143, 144, 149, 161 and 162 of 1951 and Criminal Writs Nos. Nos. 1, 8, 9/D, 22, 28, … in the present case is whether the Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949, is inconsistent with or violative of the Constitution of India. 2.

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Gopal Kabra, (1954) 24 ITR 58 = (AIR 1954 SC 158) while interpreting Section 13 of the Finance Act, 1950, already extracted above, this Court observed at p. 68 (of ITR) = (at p. 162 of AIR) : … learned Advocate General the exemption keeps in abeyance the applicability of Chapter-III till such exemption order is in force and does not rule out the applicability of the Principal Act, then, we cannot accept the arguments of

State Vs. Ali Hafiz Mia and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

manner and to the same extent as that of any other witness vide - 'Deodhari Koeri v. Emperor' AIR 1937 Pat 34 (A).Once it is established that the accused were actually in possession over the land in … Mia have cultivated the land which is in my father's name by force and the foundation made by me is also dug out. When I … so Abdul Mia brought suit No. 173 of 1950 in the court of the Munsiff, Manipur. This … also, and thereby he deprived the defence of the opportunity of contradicting the statements of eye witnesses Under Section 162, Or. P. O. He did not prepare any sketch map of the locality either. It Is established from … which is to be examined in this case is whether Abdul Mia actually died as a result of injuries which he sustained in the field

The Federal Bank of India (Pb.) Ltd. Vs. Durga Das Kapur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 38(1) and 38(2); ;Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 45F, 162, 221 and 271;

Reported in : AIR1954P& H21; [1954]24CompCas58(P& H)

Ss. 162 and 271 of the Act. In this connection reference may be made to--'Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji', AIR 1945 PC 156 (A).18. Then it is said that under Section 221 of the Act no order for … of law that arises for decision in Civil Original No. 192 of 1950 the facts of the case may be set out in some detail.2. … the Act.16. Section 38(1) of the Act of 1949 provides: '38(1) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in Section 162 or Section 271, Indian Companies Act, 1913 (7 of 1913), and without prejudice to its powers under Section … Act, 1949, hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1949, came into force.5. On 19-9-1949, Part III-A was added to the Act of 1949 by

South India Corporation (Private) Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Board of Revenue ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax

Acts : T.C. General Sales Tax Act, 1125 - Sections 2, 3 and 24; T.C. General Sales Tax Rules, 1950 - Rule 4(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 277 and 372

Reported in : AIR1962Ker72; [1961]12STC344(Ker)

published in the Gazette on January 17, 1950, as the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act, hut came into force on May 30, 1950, by notification S. R. 1-353-A/49/RD, which is dated May 29, 1950, and so repealed … contract being proper; but the divergence has been settled by State of Madras v. Cannon Dunkerley and Co., AIR 1958 SC 560 at p. 577, where it was held that the authorisation under the 'Government of India … 14; (3) The powers of the State's executive are circumscribed by Article 162, with the result that the State's taxing authorities cannot collect the tax … originally enacted. These are firstly the following parts of the definition by Section 2. *****'2(e). 'goods' means all kinds of move-able property and includes all

Pampana Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. the Joyoti Pictures Ltd.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 156, 158, 162, 165 and 166

Reported in : AIR1955Ori84

J. in the case of --'Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Lajpat Rai', AIR 1950 EP 328 (I), lends some support to the contention of Mr. Mohapatra. … Madras High Court reported in the case of -- 'Sabapathi Press & Co. Ltd. v. R. Sabapathi Rao', AIR 1930 Mad 240 (A) and in the case of -- 'Narayandas Giridharidas v. P. & O. Banking Corporation … the position which he contends for. In my opinion, there is much force in this contention. Section 156, Indian Companies; Act clearly says that every … to prevailing prices amounts to Rs. 84,900/-. Consequently the petitioners pray that under Clauses (5) and (6) of Section 162, Companies Act, the Company is unable to pay the debts and that it is also just and proper

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 278, 291, 294, 295 and 306; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56 and 197; Rajasthan Excise Duties Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 30; Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 11 and 13; Rajasthan Administration (Amendment) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 8 and 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1960Raj92

Somathmal v. State of Rajasthan, 1954 Raj LW 43: (AIR 1954 Raj 162), to show that if the agreement purported to be a special law … the court admitted them in evidence in his presence. It was held in Gopal Das v. Sri Thakurji, AIR 1943 PC 83 (87) that an objection to the mode of proof of a document (as distinguished from … 3 of which provided for the continuance of all the laws in force in any covenanting State immediately before the commencement of this Ordinance in … agreement the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, was extended to Rajasthan under Section 11 of the Finance Act, 1950 and the Rajasthan Excise Duties Ordinance, 1949 was repealed under Section 13. The Union Government started recovering excise