Advanced Search Results

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … representation on merits.'121. After the judgment was delivered by this Court representation sent by the petitioner under Section 160(4) of the Army Act, 1950 was rejected by the Chief of Army Staff without assigning any reasons.122. On

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … Army Rules. These Rules provide as follows:68. Revision. (1) Where the finding is sent back for revision under Section 160, the Court shall reassemble in open court, the revision order shall be read, and if the court is

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by … this period, the petitioner filed two contempt petitions against Union of India and its officers being CCP Nos. 160/98 and 741/2006 inter-alia claiming violation of order dated 3rd August, 1995 and various orders of the Supreme Court

Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. Vs.rama Krishna Sareen

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … not affect his license to fly. Rather, Mr. Niket would submit, Rule 160 of the Aircraft Rules exempted the petitioner from the requirement of a … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Col. (Retd) Rama Krishna Sareen vs.pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … not affect his license to fly. Rather, Mr. Niket would submit, Rule 160 of the Aircraft Rules exempted the petitioner from the requirement of a … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Rama Krishna Sareen vs.union of India &Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … not affect his license to fly. Rather, Mr. Niket would submit, Rule 160 of the Aircraft Rules exempted the petitioner from the requirement of a … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … enforce discipline, approve leave of absence etc. and draw salaries exceeding Rs. 1600/- per month and are thus not workmen as defined under Section 2(s)

Ved Prakash Gupta Vs. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(i)(c)

Reported in : AIR1984SC914; [1984(48)FLR417]; (1984)ILLJ546SC; 1984(1)SCALE474; (1984)2SCC569; [1984]3SCR169; 1984(1)SLJ569(SC); 1984(16)LC523(SC)

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … he was originally recruited as a clerk on a salary of Rs. 160/- per mensem. It was admitted by MW-1 that at the time of … of the dismissal of the appellant to the Labour Court, Faridabad in Reference No. 143 of 1980 under Section 10(i)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act.' The Labour Court framed the following

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … request, too, was turned down; rather, the petitioner was asked to examine Ms. ‘X as a defence witness. 160. When the respondents had obtained the call records of mobile phone of Ms. ‘X, and brought the same

Vikrampal Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

inadequacy etc. could be evaluated. The procedures for trial and punishment and whatever remedies under Army, Naval and Air Force Act were provided, were assessed to be providing inadequate justice to the aggrieved person. Certain observations made in the … U.P., (1973)1 SCC 216 (Para 22); New Piece Goods Bagah Co.Vs. CIT, 1950 SC 165, Arvind Mohan Sinha Vs. Amulya Kumar, (1974) 4 SCC 222; … Martial or the Appropriate authority under the Navy Act. Emphasis has also been laid that the provisions of Section 160 of Navy Act contemplates judicial review which is in the form of appeal wherein all the legal and