Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … bound to support their previous statements, which had already been brought on record by the Court of Inquiry. 155. In the absence of any explanation as to why such a course of action, despite the clear provisions

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … 1250Rs. 3.70Rs. 1251 to 1350Rs. 3.75Rs. 1351 to 1450Rs. 3.80Rs, 1451 to 1550Rs. 3.85Rs. 1551 to 1650Rs. 3.90Rs. 1651 to 1750Rs. 3.95Rs. 1751 to 1900Rs.

Moin Basha Kurnooli and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

as deemed cognizable offences. 24. In Maganlal Bagdi and Others vs. Emperor AIR 1934 Nagpur 71, at page 75, the Nagpur High Court has held … under the Constitution and other enacted laws for the time being in force. 5. At the outset, the factual matrix of these cases are relevant … (1996) 11 SCC 557, the Hon'ble Apex Court reiterated the above principle as - "Representation of the People Act 1950: Sec 31 - Investigation into, and taking cognizance of, offence under - Legality - Being a non-cognizable offence, … whether Section 78(3) of the KP Act is a cognizable or non cognizable offence in order to attract Section 155 (2) of Cr.PC. For this, it is just and necessary to have the definition of cognizable offence and

The Federal Bank of India (Pb.) Ltd. Vs. Durga Das Kapur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 38(1) and 38(2); ;Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 45F, 162, 221 and 271;

Reported in : AIR1954P& H21; [1954]24CompCas58(P& H)

Ss. 162 and 271 of the Act. In this connection reference may be made to--'Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji', AIR 1945 PC 156 (A).18. Then it is said that under Section 221 of the Act no order for … of law that arises for decision in Civil Original No. 192 of 1950 the facts of the case may be set out in some detail.2. … reference may here be made to certain provisions of the Indian Companies Act and Indian Banking Companies Act.33. Section 155, Companies Act prescribesthe mode of winding up as follows: '155(1) The winding up of a company may be … Act, 1949, hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1949, came into force.5. On 19-9-1949, Part III-A was added to the Act of 1949 by

Nepc Micon Limited, Vs. Sashi Prakash Khemka and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10F, 13A, 14, 43A, 111, 111A, 111A(2), 111A(3) and 155; Indian Stamp Act; Income Tax Act; Securities Contract (Regulatory) Act, 1956 - Sections 22A; Depositories Act, 1996; Company Amendment Act, 1998 - Sections 14; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; ;Haryana Municipal Act, 1973; BIFR Act; Depositories Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 1997; Haryana Municipal (Second Amendment) Act, 1994; Customs Act; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article s 82 and 137; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 110, 110A, 110F and 111; Depositories Act, 1995;

Reported in : [2007]137CompCas917(Mad); [2007]78SCL442(Mad)

legislature must be found in words used by the legislative itself. (AIR 1950 SC 165 - New Piece Goods bazaar co. Ltd. v. CIT). Hence, … for its action is drawn from facts antecedent in point of time to its passing of the enactment AIR 2000 SC 1976 - Dilip v. Mohd. Azizal Haq. It is an accepted canon of interpretation that in … 15.1.97. The words 'or any other law for the time being in force' was added with effect from 15-Jan,1997, so as to include contravention of … Government under Section 111 of the Companies Act or to appeal before the High Court for rectification under Section 155 of the Companies Act. The provision of Section 155 of the Companies Act relating to the power of

indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd., Apollo Hospital Employees Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Mines Act, 1952; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Discipline Act, 1934; Employees' State of Insurance Act; Constitution of India - Article 30

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT337; 2002(63)DRJ295; [2001(90)FLR460]; (2001)IILLJ1274Del

that dispute'. The definition, however, excludes specifically those who are subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Discipline Act, 1934, as well as those who are employed in the Police Service or … construction in Seaford Court Estates Ltd. v. Asher, (1949) 2 All ER 155, where Lord Denning, L.J., said: 'When a defect appears a Judge cannot … 1946, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') is applicable to the Hospitals. If it is so enforceable, Section 3 of the Act mandates the 'employer' of the 'industrial establishment' to submits its draft standing orders to

Laxmi Prasad and anr. Vs. Shiv Pal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Uttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1974All313

governing such cases are well settled. In Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1953 SC 221, the Supreme Court laid down:--'..... a right of appeal is not merely a matter of … No. 12 of 1972) was promulgated by the Governor and came into force on June 30, 1972. The Ordinance was replaced by the U. P. … Act, 1901, or the U. P. Tenancy Act, 1939, or the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, or the Uttar Pradesh Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1956, or the Jaunsar-Bawar Zamindari Abolition … 33 of 1972). The Act came into force on August 18, 1972. Section 2 of this Act introduced a new Section 4 in the U. … on Interpretation of Statutes, Eleventh Edition, at page 155 where it is observed:-- 'There is no rule

Hutchiah Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Karnataka High Court Act - Sections 9, 10, 25-F, 25-G, 25-H and 25-N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ30Kant

does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … and Natural Gas Commission v. Dr. Md. S. Isakander Ali, [1980-II L.L.J. 155], to show the precarious status of a probationer. 8. In our view, … cannot wholly govern, courts cannot go haywire in interpreting provisions, ignoring the text and context.' 'A break-down of section 2(oo) unmistakably expands the semantics of retrenchment. 'Termination for any reason whatsoever' are the key words. Whatever the

Adi Pherozshah Gandhi Vs. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 37 and 38; Chartered Accountants' Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91, 92 and 112;

Reported in : AIR1971SC385; (1970)2SCC484; [1971]1SCR863

Court where any person subject to the Naval Discipline Act or to the Army Act or to the Air Force Act is accused of any of the offences specified therein. It is not open to the Advocate- General to … Treating the matter historically, it may be said that in many respects the position of an Advocate-General before 1950 was very similar to that of the Attorney-General in England. Sections 100 and III of a statute of … order of the disciplinary committee of a State Bar Council made under section 35 may, within sixty days of the date of the communication of … 100 and III of a statute of 1813, 53 George M, C. 155.L169Sup.CI(P)/71-13898enabled the Advocates-General to exhibit to, the respective Supreme Courts of Judicature at