Advanced Search Results

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … read out to him. He was then cautioned in terms of Regulation 151 of Regulations, Navy, Part II. This was on 12-6-1992. Thereafter on 15-6-1992, … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

the defense Department where services of a person were dispensed with invoking power under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950. That Section reads as under:- '18. Tenure of service under the Act._Every person subject to this Act shall … the Air Staff', 1982 (1) SLR 521. 2. 'A.K.Malhotra v. Union of India & Others', 1997 (4) SLR 151. 19. The learned counsel for the respondents, Ms.Geeta Luthra, submitted that the respondents had acted in accordance with

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … sentence shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed upon him.”15. Similarly, Section 151 of the 1957 Act which deals with commencement of sentence has been amended by Act 23 of 2005

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed upon him.” 15. Similarly, Section 151 of the 1957 Act which deals with commencement of sentence has been amended by Act 23 of 2005

Bahirumal Basdev and anr. Vs. Lalit Kishore Son of Kalyan Prasad by Ca ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : TenancyCivil

Reported in : 1976WLN112

out to the tenant.4. In Prabha Shanker v. Smt. Rukmani and Ors. AIR 1976 Raj 19 considered the effect of the amendment on the pending … it, but it is the abstract ratio decidendi which alone has the force' of Jaw as regards the would at large. The only use of … the suit premises by the plaintiff under Section 13(1)(h) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was proved. Dissatisfied with the decree pasted by the lower appellate court, … in Bbanwarlal's case 1976 RLW 59 wherein the case was remanded for trial to the trial court under Section 151 CPC, are errone3us& need to be considered then in that case, the only course open to this Court

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … the ‘terms of reference and/or to supply copies of the anonymous letters, which form the subject-matter of enquiry. 151. While considering the above contention of the respondents, it needs to be noted that complete and effective meaning

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had

Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2393

dealt with the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … Summary General Court Martial was held according to the provisions of Rules 151 to 165 of the Army Rules, 1954 and the petitioner was afforded … Martial for the commission of offence of murder of Lance Nk. Partap Singh.4. The petitioner was chargesheeted under Section 69 of the Army Act for committing a civil offence under Section 302 of the Ranbir Penal Code.

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to … shall use minimal force required for effective action against the person/persons acting in contravention of the prohibitory order.” 151. In this context it is important to quote the Ten Commandments issued by the Chief of Army Staff.

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

supervision and is equivalent to confinement in the sense in which it is used in subsection (2) of Section 151 of the Act.23. Thus, it cannot be said that under the provisions of the Navy Act including the … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of