Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.
Guwahati
Jul-31-1997
Criminal
Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59
in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner … trial, take the matter to the confirming authority for redress.By way of illustration, there are orders contemplated by Section 150 of the Air Force Act. But this apart, the very fact that a finding or sentence is not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … a vital right, who has the burden to show that notwithstanding such violation, no prejudice has been caused. 150. In the backdrop of the above position of law, when we revert to the case at hand, we
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Delhi
Jul-21-1998
Service
Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17
76(1998)DLT554
him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17, Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExtra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr
Supreme Court of India
Jul-13-2016
Land Acquisition
court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to … justify the use of such force under the legal provisions mentioned above.34. It is emphasized that only around 1500 militants are holding a population of about 23 lakhs in Manipur to ransom and keeping the people in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P.N. Sharma Vs. the Union of India
Delhi
Jan-23-1968
Criminal
Constitution of India; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(1)
AIR1968Delhi158; 1968CriLJ1059; ILR1968Delhi263
foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years. The finding and the sentence of … take the matter to the Confirming Authority for redress. By way of illustration, there are orders contemplated by section 150 of the Air Force Act. But this apart, the very fact that a finding or sentence is nto
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Sqn. Ldr. R. Sood
Delhi
Jan-11-2008
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 37, 121 and 122(1); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(7), 16, 16(2) and 17; Army Act - Sections 19 and 122; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 365 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197(2); Constitution of India - Sections 311(2)
2008(102)DRJ52
the Armed Forces. The respondent was dismissed from service by the Central Government under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by issuing an order dated 22nd September, 1993.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiv. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … hours a day for which he was paid a sum of Rs. 150/- p.m., and as he was entitled to work elsewhere as well, revealed … dated 10th September 1998 held that the claimant before it, was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the 'Act') as he had worked only as a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeet Singh Kaila vs.union of India and Anr.
Delhi
May-02-2017
Right to Information
EWHC694is relied upon. Learned counsel also argues that the petition is not covered under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Counsel argues that Section 27 requiring a complaint to be made to the Central Government first, operates merely … 6.9.6(d). Next review at 1 AM, IAF with MRI Spine after 06 weeks. Sd/-xxx (PK Tyagi) Wg Cdr Cl. Spl. Av Med (k) Recommendations of Medical Board In view of the above it is recommended that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India
Karnataka
Oct-07-2020
Land Acquisition
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … B N W/O NAGENDRA SWAMY B N AGED ABOUT30YEARS STAFF No.213247 # 150 BASAVESWARA NILAYA11H CROSS3D MAIN, BAPUJI NAGAR, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 026.23. … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »