Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Sqn. Ldr. R. Sood
Delhi
Jan-11-2008
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 37, 121 and 122(1); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(7), 16, 16(2) and 17; Army Act - Sections 19 and 122; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 365 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197(2); Constitution of India - Sections 311(2)
2008(102)DRJ52
the Armed Forces. The respondent was dismissed from service by the Central Government under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by issuing an order dated 22nd September, 1993. … for using criminal force against Mohinder Singh. A criminal case was also filed by the police under Sections 147, 365, 304 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code against the respondent and others, which was finally
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … from the above named convict.2. The above named convict may be informed that under the provisions of Rule 147/A of the Army Rules, 1954, the Central Government have specified that it is against the interest of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … amount to denial of the right to a human being to live with dignity in a humane society. 147. Whenever, therefore, an attack is made on the character or reputation of a person, the law has always
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-1994
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325
1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)
- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - … undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. All the accused persons were also convicted for an offence under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment. Major Singh was also convicted for an offence under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMathur Aviation Vs. Lt. Governor, and ors.
Delhi
Feb-10-1977
Labour and Industrial
(1977)IILLJ255Del
dispute, but does not include any such person:(i) who i3 subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 19i4, or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … and Shambhu Nath Vaid v. Labour Court Amritsar and Ors. (1959) F.J.R. 147. The first of these cases was concerned with a notice issued under … Dalip K. Kapur, J.1. On 17th August, 1972, under Sections 10(1)(d) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1957, a reference was made to the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Karnataka Lingayat Education Society, Vs. Siddappa G Namba,
Karnataka Dharwad
Jun-02-2017
Education
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … only regarding the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to decide such applications of the respondent - workmen under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’).2. The issue involved before the Labour Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmaravila Krishnan Nair Vs. the Election Commissioner of India, New De ...
Kerala
Aug-26-1970
Election
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 329; Representation of the People Act, 1950; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 15
AIR1972Ker5
for brevity, call the writ) and culminating in that result--see N. P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, Naniakkal Constituency, AIR 1952 SC 64. It is of paramount importance that an election, whether in progress or yet to be … rolls of the 133 Assembly Constituencies. The electoral rolls that were in force on 15-11-1969 were published as draft on that day inviting claims and … country could, except to the extent of the bar in Section 30 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, issue an injunction against the holding of an election.Mathew, J.13. The petitioner is the General Secretary of the … to take away. In Anisminic. Ltd. v. Foreign Compensation Commission. 1969-2 AC 147 the House of Lords had to construe a provision for exclusion of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-23-1976
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 4, 214, 226 and 246; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 49, 50, 51, 51(2) and 51(3); Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 106 and 108; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14; Income Tax Act; Wealth Tax Act
AIR1977MP116; 1977MPLJ227
other than Nagpur140. On the coming into force of the Constitution in 1950, under Article 214 as initially enacted, it is contended, every State shall … vested in the Court'. Dealing with this question in N. S. Thread Co. v. James Chadwick & Brothers, AIR 1953 SC 357, their Lordships of the Supreme Court held as under:'Section 108 of the Government of India … by the High Court in exercise of its powers under Article 225 of the Constitution which came into force on the 15th day of October 1951. The other High Court Rules, which were previously framed, are not … of Madhya Pradesh was constituted under Section 9 of the States Reorganization Act, 195,6 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') with effect from the appointed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThandamma and ors. Vs. Kuriakose Putherickal Iype
Kerala
Feb-12-1962
Commercial
Debt Law; Cochin Agriculturists Relief Act, 1114 - Sections 14; Travancore- Cochin Indebted Agriculturists Relief Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 5
AIR1962Ker235
been placed on a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Nainamul v. B. Subba Rao, (S) AIR 1957 Andh Pra 546 in support of this contention. The question decided therein was whether a payment made … therefore taken up the stand that the Cochin Act is still in force. This is not disputed by the res-pondent. We therefore proceed in this … we have taken of Section 4, there can be no question of Section 5 of the T. C. Act, 1950 being attracted, the interest claimed in the suit, Rs. 567-7-3 being very much less than half the principal … Amma, 35 Cochin 125 and Kumaren Ez-huthjisan v. Paramckavu Devaswom, 34 Cochin 147- In all these cases, the debt was one inquired before the Cochin
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbhimanyu Vs. The Union of India and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jun-21-2016
Land Acquisition
of India and Ors. (2011 AIR SCW 396)and submits that, while considering the provisions of Central Reserve Police Force Act and the Rules thereunder, the Supreme Court has taken a view that, the termination of the services of … Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Army Act, 1950 Section 44 Section 164 Conviction and dismissal Petitioner challenged validity of order of conviction and dismissal in Summary Court … Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ahmedpur acquitted the petitioner in RCC No. 147/1999. The learned counsel invited our attention to the provisions of Section 44
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »