Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 146 · Page 1 of about 186 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

in the context of Rule 156(2) of the Air Force Rules, 1969, which no court can, perhaps, ignore. 146. Article 21 guarantees to every person, including a person subject to the Air force Act, 1950, that he … records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2004

Vinesh Kumar Mehta S/O Shiv NaraIn Mehta Vs. Presiding Officer Labour ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 6I, 6N, 6P, 6Q and 33C(2); Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC680; [2005(104)FLR338]

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person.(i) who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … U.P., Kanpur- respondent No. 1 respondent No. 1 in Adjudication Case No. 146 of 1994 by which the following reference with regard to termination of … He pleaded that his termination was illegal, null and void as it was brought about in violation of Sections6-I, 6-N, 6-P and-6-Q of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.3. The employers took a stand before the Labour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 15 1976

Damoda Panigrahi and ors. Vs. Banchhanidhi Pangrahi and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-15-1976

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1977CriLJ142

the case of Ram Singh v. Crown AIR 1950 East Punj 25 : 51 Cri LJ 459 … Procedure Code was passed by the Magistrate on 13-5-1975 after coming into force of the new Criminal Procedure Code revision therefrom to the Sessions Court … the subject-matter of dispute on the date of the preliminary order, he acted under Section 146 old Criminal Procedure Code by attaching it, drawing up … was in possession of the subject-matter of dispute on the date of the preliminary order, he acted under Section 146 old Criminal Procedure Code by attaching it, drawing up a statement of the facts of the case and … Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in the case of Raja Singh v. Mahendra Singh : AIR1963Pat243 . In the Supreme Court case their Lordships have said that under the law of England, as it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1976

Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-1976

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 4, 214, 226 and 246; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 49, 50, 51, 51(2) and 51(3); Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 106 and 108; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14; Income Tax Act; Wealth Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1977MP116; 1977MPLJ227

other than Nagpur140. On the coming into force of the Constitution in 1950, under Article 214 as initially enacted, it is contended, every State shall … vested in the Court'. Dealing with this question in N. S. Thread Co. v. James Chadwick & Brothers, AIR 1953 SC 357, their Lordships of the Supreme Court held as under:'Section 108 of the Government of India … by the High Court in exercise of its powers under Article 225 of the Constitution which came into force on the 15th day of October 1951. The other High Court Rules, which were previously framed, are not … Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 : 'Counsel for the petitioners has relied on … of Madhya Pradesh was constituted under Section 9 of the States Reorganization Act, 195,6 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') with effect from the appointed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1958

Chinnan Kesavan Vs. Gouri Amma

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-23-1958

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 146 - Order 21, Rule 16

Reported in : AIR1959Ker180

above-mentioned cases.In the first of those cases, reference was made to the decision in Mahanandi Reddi v. Venkatappa AIR 1942 Mad 21 where the scop of Section 146 had been considered and discussed. All the same, it … by this Code or by any law for the time being in force, where any proceeding may be taken or application made by or against … subsequently passed in that suit, does not appear to have been considered. In fact, the real scope of Section 146 of C. P. C., was not considered in all its implications in either of the above-mentioned cases.In the … of the then pending suit. This transfer under the Transfer of Properly Act, carried all the legal incidents and the remedies in relation to that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1963

Satyanarayan Vs. Sindhu Bai Sharma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1963

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 146 - Order 21, Rule 16

Reported in : AIR1965AP81

writing under O. 21 R. 16. The Supreme Court in Jugalkishore v. M/s Rao Cotton Co. Ltd., (S) AIR 1955 SC 376 after a review of the case law on the subject laid down that the provisions … by this Code or by any law for the time being in force, where any proceeding may be taken or application made by or against … am not concerned with the other aspects of that decision which deals with equitable assessment. As far as Section 146 is concerned it was observed by their Lordships of the Supreme Court:'There is nothing in O. 21 R. … of O. 21 R. 16 on a strict construction thereof contemplate the actual transfer of decree by an assignment in writing executed after the decree

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2016

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to … v. Tulsiram Patel[61]. and Shivaji Atmaji Sawant v. State of Maharashtra.[62]. Armed rioters are also involved in violence. Section 146 of the IPC[63]. explains rioting as use of force or violence by an unlawful assembly or by any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2025

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

Secretary & Anr., 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1116, wherein it has been held as under: - “45. The Air Force after due sanction of the President of India itself brought a policy into force for recruitment of women. … virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … in terms of gender gap in economic participation, India ranks 142nd among 146 countries. In terms of overall gender gap - 1292 [2025] 8 S.C.R.Supreme

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1959

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-29-1959

Subject : Education

a Top Secret clearance by the Air Material Command on February 3, 1950. [ Footnote 2 ] ERCO did classified contract work for the various … various armed services. [ Footnote 2 ] On November 21, Page 360 U. S. 477 1951, however, the Army-Navy-Air Force Personnel Security Board (PSB) advised ERCO that the company's clearances for access to classified information were in jeopardy … S. 508 Hannegan v. Esquire, 327 U. S. 146 , 327 U. S. 156 ; Wong Yang … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial