Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 145 · Page 1 of about 253 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 27 1993

P.C. Kakar Vs. Commandant, Military Hospital, Trimalgiri and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39, 145, 191 and 192; Navy Act; Air Force Act; Army Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 33; Medical Service Regulations, 1983 - Regulation 446, 447 and 448

Reported in : 1994(1)ALT1; 1994CriLJ1025

clause (a) of Regulation 446 which says that any person subject to the Army Act, Navy Act or Air Force Act 'showing symptoms of psycois will at once be admitted to hospital and placed under observation and treatment. If … a civil hospital because of the Military Nursing Service Ordinance (30 of 1943) as amended by the Army Act, 1950. Captain Latha Sharma absented herself from the place of her duty and, therefore, she committed an offence under … forcibly sent to military hospital by army officers during pendency of investigation of complaint filed by her - Section 145 cannot be circumvented by resorting to Regulation - restriction can be placed on fundamental rights of members of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … used for the purpose of contradicting a witness or impeaching the credibility of a witness in terms of Section 145 of the Evidence Act. 28. Thus, the scheme of the Air Force Rules, 1969, if carefully read, clearly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2010

Sergeant P.L. Dhaka (Retd) New Delhi Versus Union of India Through Its ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2010

Subject : Right to Information

In that quarter, search was affected by Air Officer Commanding without any authority and contrary to provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) and Air Force Rules, 1969 (“The Rules”). Even the Chief of Air … effected on 19.12.1998 and in the course of search as many as 145 bottles of liquor in wooden and steel boxes were recovered which he … In order to appropriate the answer it is to be determined whether in exercise of the powers under section 190, the Central Government has issued any executive instructions or regulation other than what were specified in Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 1954

Durjan Singh Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-27-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(1) and 537

Reported in : AIR1954Raj217

All 230 (F); -- 'Shan-kar v. Rex', AIR 1950 All 274 (G); -- 'Narain Singh v. Mt. … of this Court on the point raised before him. He has referred to -- 'Ramchandra v. Bhairon Buksh', AIR 1954 Raj 51 (A) and --'Mohansingh v. Kishan-lal', 1952 RLW 236 (B), and also to -- 'Narotam v. … of the whole proceedings.'Those remarks, in our humble judgment, apply with full force to many of the Calcutta decisions to which we have referred above … This is a reference by a learned Single Judge of this Court and relates to the interpretation of Section 145, Cr. P. C. The question referred to this Bench is in the following terms:'Whether the omission on the … imminent danger of abreach of the peace, and it was prayed that action be taken under Section 107, Cr. P. C.On 15-11-1951, the learned Magistrate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1999

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … 1150Rs. 3.65Rs. 1151 to 1250Rs. 3.70Rs. 1251 to 1350Rs. 3.75Rs. 1351 to 1450Rs. 3.80Rs, 1451 to 1550Rs. 3.85Rs. 1551 to 1650Rs. 3.90Rs. 1651 to 1750Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1987

Uma Chopra Vs. R.N. Jindal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-1987

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(5)

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT85; 1989LabIC437

but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … High Court in J.Muthaygam v. Manager,Kodalur Estate and another 1982- Lab. Ic 145 wherein after referring to the aforesaid two judgments of the Supreme Court, … for decision in this petition is whether a teacher is a workman or not within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ('for short 'the Act'). (2) The petitioner was appointed as a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1976

Damoda Panigrahi and ors. Vs. Banchhanidhi Pangrahi and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-15-1976

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1977CriLJ142

the case of Ram Singh v. Crown AIR 1950 East Punj 25 : 51 Cri LJ 459 … Procedure Code was passed by the Magistrate on 13-5-1975 after coming into force of the new Criminal Procedure Code revision therefrom to the Sessions Court … who was of opinion that this case involved important questions of law.It arises out of a proceeding under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code in which the petitioners were members of the second party and which was registered as … Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in the case of Raja Singh v. Mahendra Singh : AIR1963Pat243 . In the Supreme Court case their Lordships have said that under the law of England, as it … the subject-matter of dispute on the date of the preliminary order, he acted under Section 146 old Criminal Procedure Code by attaching it, drawing up

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1982

Cpl. Gokul Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-1982

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1223

petitioner that he was likely to be tried for offences under Sections 40A and 71 of the Indian Air Force Act (No. XLV of 1950) (for short 'the Act' herein). Thereafter, the petitioner made representation on June 24. 1982 … accused person should be initiated before a Magistrate.In 1972 All Cri R 145, it was held that the personnel of the Indian Air Force constitute … S.C. Agrawal, J.1. By this appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, the petitioner Cpl. Gokul Ram questions the correctness of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1976

Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-1976

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 4, 214, 226 and 246; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 49, 50, 51, 51(2) and 51(3); Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 106 and 108; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14; Income Tax Act; Wealth Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1977MP116; 1977MPLJ227

other than Nagpur140. On the coming into force of the Constitution in 1950, under Article 214 as initially enacted, it is contended, every State shall … vested in the Court'. Dealing with this question in N. S. Thread Co. v. James Chadwick & Brothers, AIR 1953 SC 357, their Lordships of the Supreme Court held as under:'Section 108 of the Government of India … by the High Court in exercise of its powers under Article 225 of the Constitution which came into force on the 15th day of October 1951. The other High Court Rules, which were previously framed, are not … Harakchand v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 1453 their Lordships reiterated the rules of interpretation of … of Madhya Pradesh was constituted under Section 9 of the States Reorganization Act, 195,6 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') with effect from the appointed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial