Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … that the decision, in Himmat Singh Chahar (supra), does not apply to the facts of the present case. 140. Mr. Choudhury has rightly pointed out that the practice of filing of judgments in compilation, but not citing,

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Mechanical WG VII/CPVI Assistant time Diploma - Electronics Rs.4620- in 135-5970- Engineering+1 140- year 8350+admis apprenticeship sible training allowances 2 Technician ITI + 1 Year … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and

Municipal Board, Vanechand Sagarmal and 24 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilOther Taxes

Reported in : 1975(8)WLN530

Vengayil Rayarappan Nayanar v. Kutoor Vengayil Valia Madhvi Amma and Ors AIR 1950 FC 140, that it is a well understood rule of general law … Supreme Court have laid down the law as follows in State of Bihar v D.N. Ganguly and Ors. AIR 1958 SC 1018 with reference to the provisions of Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,-It is … and Anr. : AIR1966Guj248 on which also reliance has been placed by Mr. Parekh. There is thus no force in the argument which Mr. Parekh has advanced against the view which has prevailed with us in regard

Rama Sundari Devi Vs. Indu Bhusan Bose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; ;Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1967Cal355

Government may by notification declare any place or places in which any part of the Indian army or air force is quartered, or which being in the vicinity of any such place or places is or are required … occupation of himself and his family, within the meaning of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. This Act was a State Act but was made applicable to the Nasirabad cantonment area in which the … of the inmates thereof, steps may be taken to abate the overcrowding by regulating the number of inmates. Section 140 gives power to the Board to require the repair or alteration of any building within the Cantonment area

Kundan Singh Vs. Kabul Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 16 to 23, 23(2), 23(3), 27 and 30; Representation of the People (Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 62, 62(1), 62(2), 62(3), 62(4), 62(5) and 100(1); Representation of the People (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 - Rule 30

Reported in : AIR1969P& H352

of their respective contentions. The following passage at p. 621 (of Pun LR) + (at P. 3 of AIR) is referred to emphasise the force of Mr. Bedi's argument about the true effect and significance of the … view of the inhibition laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 23 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (hereinafter called the Act') that 'no direction for the inclusion of a name in the electoral roll of … Justice Vivian Bose in Pratap Singh v. Shri Krishan Gupta, AIR1956 SC 140, 'Some rules are vital and go to the root of the matter;

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company of India Ltd. Vs. th ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Factories Act; Shops and Establishments Act; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1971SC922; [1971(22)FLR11]; (1970)IILLJ590SC; (1970)3SCC378; [1971]2SCR758

dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … number of persons involved in the reference in the Maharashtra region is 140. The effect of the decision of the Tribunal is that 98 employees … and of preparing various returns. Being the senior-most clerk, he was put in charge of the provident fund section and was given a small amount of control over the other clerks working in his section. The only

Sisir Kumar Dutta and ors. Vs. Susil Kumar Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : AIR1961Cal229,65CWN1

it can always, be amended.'31. (f) Gajanan Nanaji v. Rajeshwar Krishnaji, AIR 1950 Nag 237: ILR 1950 Nag 432. This was a suit for possession … v. Mt. Kaniza Fatima, ILR 5 Pat 631 : (AIR 1927 Pat 140), which had taken a similar view. He cared to follow a decision … the learned Munsif is set out below:'In view of the decision reported in Satish Kumar v. Sailabasini Devi, AIR 1949 Cal 621, the valuation for the purpose of Court-fees in such a suit is governed by Section … once it is found to come under Section 7(v), Court-fees Act. Nor am I able to appreciate the force of the observation that the subject-matter of the suit is the right of the licensee to remain in

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Section 110, 66, 107(1)(vi), 67(1), 122A, 83; Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Section 80, 107; Acquisition Act; Constitution Of India - Article 254(1), 300A, 21, 31C

The Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act, 1947 and the Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950 (1951) 2 SCR 747, Rajnarain Singh v. The Chairman, Patna Admnistration Committee, Patna& Another, AIR 1954 SC 569, … read with Decree dated 19.4.1954. When the Land Reforms Act came into force, they filed declarations under Section 66 of the Act before the Land … Learned senior counsel also submitted that the State Government has also not followed the procedure laid down in Section 140 of the Land Reforms Act and, in any view, the mere laying of the notification before the State