Advanced Search Results

Murlidhar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 135C; Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 - Sections 8 and 53; Constitution of India - Articles 161 to 166, 226 and 324(1); Rajasthan Excise Rules, 1951 - Rules 41 and 93; Rajasthan Excise (Amendment) Rules, 1958; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR2000Raj170

dispute the contractual obligations by invoking the extraordinary writ jurisdiction. In Bareilly Development Authority v. Ajay Pal Singh, AIR 1989 SC. 1076, a similar contention had been raised. The Apex Court considered a catena of judgments, particularly, … a period of nine days preceding the date of poll, have any force as would warrant their acceptance, particularly when the validity of the direction … has been entrusted with the power to pass such an order under Section 8 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (hereinafter called 'the Act, 1950') and the State Government is not competent to do so; the counting would … there is no justification for declaring 5-10-99 also as-a dry day; Section 135-C of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short, 'the Act, 1951')

A. B. K. Prasad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ElectionCriminal

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 135, 136 and 136(1) ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2); Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1974 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 379, 411 and 505; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rules 46 and 93; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1997AP357; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)174

cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army. Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duly as such; or (b) with intent … Sections 135 and 136 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Ballot paper is a classified document. Section 135 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 makes removal of ballot papers from polling station an offence

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … of Inquiry commences its proceeding, Rule 156(7) comes into operation, when the Court of Inquiry concludes its proceedings. 135. It is in the above context that a Division Bench of Delhi High Court, while considering the provisions

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that, … full - Mechanical WG VII/CPVI Assistant time Diploma - Electronics Rs.4620- in 135-5970- Engineering+1 140- year 8350+admis apprenticeship sible training allowances 2 Technician ITI +

Major Uday Nangia, Officer's Mess, Officers Training Academy Vs. the A ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 125, 135, 153 and 164; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 285, 306 and 498A; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 3(1), 34, 34(1), 136, 137 and 137(2)

Reported in : (2007)4MLJ140

defence taken by him and the six names are as follows:1. Gp Capt AK Behl, Plastic Surgeon at Air Force Command Hospital, Bangalore in 2002-2003.2. Wg Cdr T Roy, Plastic Surgeon at Air Force Command Hospital, Bangalore in … by the second respondent General Court Martial [for short, 'GCM'] exercising option under Section 125 of the Army Act, 1950, which reads as under:Section 125. Choice between criminal court and court-martialWhen a criminal court and a court-martial have … given. The learned Counsel drew the attention of the relevant provisions of the Army Act and particularly, to Section 135 of the Army Act as well as Rules 34, 136 and 137 of the Army Rules, which read

M/s. Val Colour Arts, Mumbai and Another Vs. Sandesh Ramesh Bhosle

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

had led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … In any case, the employee being 'site supervisor' did not answer the definition of 'workman' in terms of Section 3(5) of the said Act read with Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. On these grounds,

Cpl Ashish Kumar Chauhan (retd.) Vs. Commanding Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

deemed unfit for re-employment and extension of service. Consequently, he was discharged from permanent service in the Indian Air Force. In fact, he was later selected by the Food Corporation of India. But, due to his HIV positive … failed to produce the copy of the notice/summons served to the appellant under Section 135 of the Army Act, 1950 regarding the CoI, which alleged that the appellant was called for the inquiry but did not attend its

Ajaib Singh Lehna Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 21, 22, 51, 227, 245 and 253; Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1952P& H309

a person's freedom of locomotion 'except in making a lawful arrest.'In 'Gopalan A. K. v. State of Madras', AIR' 1950 SC 27, Patanjali Sastri J,. observed as follows:'Article 19 seems to my mind to presupposethat the citizen … Pakistan for the restoration of abducted persons. It is to remain in force till the 31st October, 1952. According to section 2 an 'abducted person' … is wholly unnecessary to discuss the effect of the failure of the Central Government to make rules under section. 135. (1) The Act is inconsistent with Article 14 of the Constitution inasmuch as abducted persons are subject to

Deepak Mahajan Vs. the Director of Enforcement and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104(2); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 35(2); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1124

strictly complied with (See A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras Air 1950 Sc 271).(12) However, it is evident 'hat Article 22 of the Constitution … same provisions, but subject to any enactment for the time being in force regulating the manner or place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise … that the Court has the power to remand the person suspected of the commission of an offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act who has been arrested and produced before the Court, to judicial custody in a … I may at this stage note that the Supreme Court in Matabar Panda v. State of Orissa : AIR1975SC1465 while discussing the powers of remand in the Code, has held:IT may be emphasised here that the Court