Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all...”. 133. The above principle has been reiterated in several decisions of the Supreme Court including State of U.P. vs.

Chief of Air Staff Vs. Augustian

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 16; ;Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 13 and 15(2); ;Air Force Rules, 1961 - Rule 15; ;Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 158, 173 and 173A; ;Air Force Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 153

Reported in : 2010(2)KLT514

to order discharge of personnel for the causes specified therein. As per Rule 15, persons enrolled under the Air Force Act, 1950 who are attested in terms of Section 16 of the Act may be discharged at their own request … the Delhi High Court in Mahavir Singh Narwar v. Union of India and Anr. 2005 (1) All ISLJ 133 in support of his contention that a person who was placed in a lower medical category at the

Onyx Musicabsolute.Com Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 293; Copyright Act - Sections 2 and 54; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 9; Arbitration Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR26; 2008(6)BomCR418

(1) All E.R 849.10. In India in Dr.Satya Charan Law and Ors. v. Rameshwar Prasad Bajoria and Ors. AIR 1950 FC 133. the Federal Court, after recognising well settled principle of law that in order to redress … right to the defendant No. 2 to grant sub-licences to third parties. The licence was to remain in force till the joint venture agreement remained in full force and effect.5. The defendant No. 2 commenced its business … Plaintiff No. 1 is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and plaintiff Nos. 2 to 5 hold the entire share capital … mobile content of all the films covered by the licence agreement. under Section 2(j) and Section 54 of the Copyright Act, the defendant No. 2

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hazarat Pir Shah-e-alam Roza Estate Tru ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 11(1); Bombay Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 17 and 21(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 80; Court of Wards Act

Reported in : [2002]256ITR193(Guj)

of the year 1948, while the Bombay Public Trusts Act came into force from 1950. It was argued that the income-tax authorities were not bound … of Oudh High Court in Shah Mohammed Naim Ata v. Mohammad Shamshuddin AIR 1927 Oudh 113 was cited for the proposition that the property given … from the record that a suo motu inquiry was started under Section 19 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trusts Act of 1950'), by order dated March 7, 1956 (Inquiry No. 176 … Bhagatramji Ramsnehi, reported in 41 BomLR 939, was referred to for the observation that, a Sanad granted under Section 133 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 was prima facie evidence of title. It was also held that

Cit Vs. Hazarat Pir Shah-e-alam Roza Estate Trust

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Guj)66

of the year 1948, while the Bombay Public Trusts Act came into force from 1950. It was argued that the income-tax authorities were not bound … of Oudh High Court in Shah Mohammad Naim Ata v. Mohammad Shamshuddin AIR 1927 Oudh 113 was cited for the proposition that the property given … from the record that a suo motu inquiry was started under section 19 of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trusts Act of 1950'), by order dated 7-3-1956 (Inquiry No. 176 of 1956), … v. Vivekramji Bhagatramji Ramsnehi 41 BLR 939, was referred to for the observation that a Sanad granted under section 133 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879, was prima facie evidence of title. It was also held that

Amardeep Dabas Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

to show cause as to why he should not be removed from service under Section 20(3) of the Air Force Act, 1950 read in conjunction with Rule 18 of the Air Force Rules, 1969, on account of blameworthiness for the … Duty Officers Course (hereinafter referred to as `GDOC‟). The petitioner claims to have applied for 131, 132 & 133 Ground Duty Officers Courses. The petitioner could not clear the selection process for the 131 & 132 GDOC.10.

Soudamini Vs. Kunhathi

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT96

ambit and also its applicability to all persons, subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and Air Force Act, 1950 Sub-s. (2) of that section makes the Act applicable to the retired personnel governed by the aforesaid Act

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Pershad and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 19; Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rule 75A; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(1)

Reported in : AIR1952P& H116

83 and 'Lalit Kumar v. Bhagaban ch. Sarma', AIR (37) 1950 Assam 133. In 'AIR (37) 1950 EP 296' I pointed out that relation of … statutory tenant.17. For the reasons given by me in 'Governor-General in Council, New Delhi v. Indar Mani Jatia', AIR (37) 1950 E P 296, I find that the respondent is not a tenant within Article 2 (4) … March, 1947.9. On the 24th of March, 1947, the Delhi and Ajmer-Merwara Rent Control Act, 1947 came into force in the Province of Delhi and with effect from that date the claimants claimed compensation at the rate … Albuquerque Road, New Delhi, hereinafter referred to as the premises, requisitioned under Section 19 of the Defence of India Act, 1939, read with Rule 75-A

Jagannath S/O Anna Khakare and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Th ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

matter of Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. and another Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and another, reported in AIR 1986 SC 1571. In paragraph no.52 of the judgment, it is observed thus: “52 Various aspects of the … substance governmental and not commercial functions. (Cf: London County Territorial and Auxiliary Force Association v. Nichols, 1948-2 All ER 432)." 14. Relying upon the observations … with Articles of Association. It is further stated that the Government of Maharashtra, in exercise of powers under Section 133 read with Sections 131 and 134 of Electricity Act, 2003, promulgated the scheme of transfer of employees and … SC 1811 at p. 1849) per Shah, J. and Tamlin v. Hannaford, 1950-1 KB 18 at pp. 25, 26) Such an inference that the corporation

Gundapuneedi Veeranna and ors. Vs. Gundapuneedi China Venkanna and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 109 and 110; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 133(1), 134, 135 and 374(2); Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1953Mad878; (1953)IIMLJ317

(A), and to the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in -- 'Vasu-deva Samiar', In re, AIR 1929 Mad 381 (B), namely, that when a party institutes a suit he has a right of appeal … Act, called the Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947, came into force on 1-2-1948. From that day an appeal Jay to the Federal Court … made an order under Clause (2) of Article 372 of the Constitution called the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. Section 3 of this Order runs thus:"As from the appointed day the existing Central Jaws mentioned in the schedules … leave, because the case did not fulfil the pecuniary requirements of Article 133 of the Constitution. The petitioners, on the other hand, contended that by