Advanced Search Results
Sq Ldr C. Singh Versus Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur
Aug-17-2010
MRTP
and hence could not be promoted to the next rank after retirement. 11. As regards the applicability of Air Force Act, 1950, Sec. 26 of the Reserve and Auxiliary Air Force Act,1952 lays down the conditions of applicability. It clearly … case of D.S.Nakara and others v. Union of India (AIR 1983 SC 130), Rajinder singh Patpatia v. The Bhakra Beas Management Board and others (1999 … the rank of Wing Commander and consequential retrial benefits. The writ petition was transferred to this Tribunal under Sec.34 of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007 and the same has been registered as Transfer Application No. 144
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProsenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...
Delhi
Apr-25-2006
Criminal
Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations
2006(88)DRJ856
with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself and … the writ petition the petitioner moved an application for suspension of his sentence on the ground that under Section 130 of the Border Security Force Act, sentence can be suspended by the Director General or any other empowered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … Force Act, 1950, then, compliance with the requirements of the provisions, embodied in Rule 156(2), would be mandatory. 130. While considering the question of compliance with the procedural safeguards, which Rule 156(2) seeks to provide to a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Banka Das, Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Sep-15-1992
NarcoticsCriminal
Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36A(1), 36D, 37, 37(1) 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 50(1), 50(2), 50(19) and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2) and 193
1993CriLJ442; 1992(II)OLR395
where the legislature has specifically provided for such intimation. We may refer to Section 130 of the Army Act, 1950, which clearly provides that a person is to be informed that he has the right to object to … spirit of statute. [See M/s. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut and Ors. : AIR 1984 SC 505]. However, the language of the Parliament though not to be extended beyond its fair construction, … throug the loopholes is apparent from Act 2 of 1989 coming into force with effect from 29-5-1989 which inter alia substituted Section 37. The object
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...
Chennai
Jun-06-2011
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2-A(2), 17B, 25-N, 33
retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … the factory and the administrative department and that there are more than 130 clerical staff, including the employees herein, and there are nearly 400 workmen, … industrial disputes raised by the first respondents/petitioners before the Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the employee(s)) under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, the Act) directing the Management to reinstate the employees
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.S. Chooramani and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Oct-25-1967
Constitution
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Government Estates Thekedari Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 31(2), 31A and 226; Government Grants Act, 1895; Government Grants (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 4
AIR1969All43
Bengal v. Premlal Mullick, (1895) ILR 22 Cal 783 at p. 799 (PC), and Krishna Ayyanger v. Nallaperumal, AIR 1920 PC 56. The Supreme Court has similarly rejected the aid of debates in construing a section, see … No. 1 of 1959) (hereinafter called the Thekedari Abolition Act) came into force. By a notification dated 17th June, 1965 the State Government extended the … difficult to introduce the scheme of land reforms enunciated in the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, in those areas. With a view to bring the rights of people in those areas in line with … lease with a thekedar. A perusal of the Schedule shows that Sections 130 and 131 of the Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act were to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiv. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Court) and herein called the 'employer', on a monthly wage of Rs. 130/-. He thereafter made a request that his services be regularized but was … dated 10th September 1998 held that the claimant before it, was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the 'Act') as he had worked only as a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-30-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2
(2000)ILLJ1583Bom
led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTannery and Footwear Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and or ...
Allahabad
Mar-18-1993
Labour and Industrial
(1994)IILLJ1186All
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person. (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who … been enrolled as apprentice. He was to get consolidated stipend of Rs. 130/- per month, which is reflected by Annexure 3 to the writ petition. … statute is said to have been sent in triplicate to the concerned authorities for registration as required under Section 4(4) of the Act of 1961. A copy of the contract with covering letter is Annexure 4 to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAparna P vs Union of India Represented by Ministry of CIVIL Aviation
Kerala
Jan-27-2023
eighth respondent. The first petitioner raises statutory claim for the wife and children under Section 92(i) of the Air Force Act, 1950. The petitioners have submitted Ext.P1 application before the third respondent - Air Chief Marshal, Chief of Air Staff, … RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI., PIN - 110003 2 SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 130-A, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, 109-B, W.P.(C.) No. 2745/2023 2 SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011 3 AIR
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »