Advanced Search Results

G.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ485

justice and discipline demanded that he should be retried, the retrial had been ordered under the provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 in particular in the light of the provisions of Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner contends that … the respondents have no jurisdiction to convene a second General Court Martial for his retrial. He pleads that Section 120 of the Air Force Act bars such a trial and therefore a writ of Mandamus be issued to

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … they had been confirmed under the provisions of the Air Force Act, and that in such a case Section 120 of the Air Force Act (which is in pari materia with Section 121 of the Army Act) barred

Chandulal Jethalal Jayaswal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India- Articles 19, 265, 301 and 304; Bombay Prohabition Act - Sections 2, 59C and 59D; Gujarat Denatured Spirituous Preparations Rules, 1962 - Rules 22 and 37

Reported in : AIR1964Guj59; (1963)GLR1033

the Gujarat Denatured Spirituous Preparations Rules, 1962. These rules were brought into force with effect from June 1, 1962. They purport to impose certain restrictions … (b) of the Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, as amended by the Indian Criminal Law Amendment (Madras) Act, 1950, stated that the formula of subjective satisfaction of the Government or of its officers with an Advisory Body … such a distinction, he also relied upon Sections 120, 128-A, 139(d) and 143(b), (c), (hl), (k) and … Sorabji relied upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in F.N. Balsara v. State of Bombay : AIR1951Bom210 , where that High Court held that Item No. 31 in the Government of India Act, 1935, which … Shelat, C.J.1. These two petitions challenge the validity of Sections 2(10a), 59-C and 59-D of the Bombay Prohibition Act, XXV of 1949,

Jsw Energy Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

retrenchment had led to that dispute, but does not include any such person;(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Ravi Hegde, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 in all the - 120 - above matters and Sri. V.S. Kalsurmath, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing … that Respondent No.2 was working in a managerial cadre and was not a ‘workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ID Act’ for brevity). 11.5. Respondent No.1-Government

Capt. U.R. Roy Choudhury Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ796

Rule 3 is relevant for our purpose. It requires that wihen a person subject to military, naval or air force law is brought before a Magistrate on accusation of an offence for which he is liable to be … no manner of doubt that the offences alleged come within the purview of Section 52 of the Army Act, 1950. Therefore, such offences could be also tried by the court martial. It is only with regard to the … (3) Lt. Col. Birendra Nath Mazumdar (respondent in Govt. Appeal) under Section 120-B read with Section 5 (2) of Act II of 1947 and under

Sgt Mohanti Bk Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Service

There was no illegality in detailing Sgts for guard duty as the provision for the same exist in Air force Regulations 1964. It was therefore decided that the number of guards was to be increased and to cater … twice in writing for guard duty (Exhibit ‘N of DCM proceedings page 120). The appellant refused to perform guard duty on both occasions. In view … convened on 27 March 1996 and he was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN GIVEN PERSONALLY BY HIS SUPERIOR … was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

D.S. Mahi and Ram Diya Vs. the Special Police Establishment

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 207

Reported in : 2007(1)PTC0(Mad)

in a export and import company at New Delhi. During 1950 to 1959 he was working in Indian Air Force and his discharge certificate is Ex.P.175 and that he worked again in the army from 1962 and 1965 … criminal conspiracy between 1972 and 1974 at Avadi, Madras. New Delhi and other places to commit certain illegal acts or certain acts which are not illegal by illegal means viz., to unauthorisedly and illegally get army discarded … Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen Board, it will be processed in the 4-H, Section of the Master General of Ordinance Branch, Army Headquarters at New Delhi … to whom they were delivered by him.3. A9 was charged under Section 120(B) IPC and under Section 5(2) & 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act

Corporal Vijayakumar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Defence Se ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

officers. This necessitated filing of a series of Redressel of Grievances Applications (ROGs) under Section 26 of the Air Force Act, 1950, read with Para. 621 of the Air Force Regulations, 1969, and its Correction Slip No. 24/VII/70, (in short … AND PERSONAL HISTORY: No past illness. Hails from Kerala. 6th among 7 sibs…….” “…..CLINICAL CONDITION: Pulse 84/Min. BP: 120/70 mm of Hg. Systemic exam NAD. Psychological evaluation for over 4 weeks revealed no abnormality. CPL mixes well

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Maj. Virendrarai J. Kharod

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1987)2GLR1020

such exclusion in Articles 32 and 226. In our opinion, the Courts-Martial set up under the Army Act, Air Force Act and Navy Act are the Tribunals which would be amenable to the writs of mandamus, prohibition and certiorari … impugned order, exercised judicial or quasi-judicial functions. This is also evident from the relevant provisions of the Army Act, 1950 and Rules framed thereunder. This Court, therefore, has power to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the … the respondent guilty of the charges levelled against him was convened under Section 109 of the Army Act. The High Court, therefore, does not have … of summarily a case which he is debarred by Army Act, Section 120(2) from trying by summary Court-martial without reference to a superior authority, or