Advanced Search Results

Wg.Cdr. Manisha Krishnatri (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Air Force Act 1950 - Section 12

The Secretary & Anr. 2. The origin of the litigation could be traced to Section 12 of the Air Force Act 1950 which makes females ineligible for enrolment or employment in the Air Force, except in such corps, department, branch

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … to holding of offices etc. by Chairperson or member on ceasing to be such of Chairperson or member. Section 12 deals with financial and administrative powers of Chairperson and Section 13 deals with staff of the Tribunal.Chapter III

C.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503

forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) are … dispute substituted Clause (a) and has been effected by Maharashtra Act No. 12 of 1991 dated 27-3-1991 with effect from 1-11-1976. The Division Bench at … Tax Officer in denying them exemption from payment of profession tax and the petitioners rely upon provisions of Section 27-A(a) of Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act (16 of 1975), (hereinafter referred to

R. Suresh Babu Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sent the petitioner to CH, AF, Bangalore in February 1996 which is gross violation of Section 47 of Air Force Act, 1950. 2(c)The petitioner got discharged from hospital as a normal case having no abnormality found, routed back to MTTI, … the Armed Force Tribunal Act, 2007, both the petitions were transferred to this Tribunal and reassigned T.A.Nos.125 and 126 of 2009 respectively. 2. The short facts in the affidavit to the petition in T.A.No.125 of 2009 relevant

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in … or usage as a part of that law inconsistent with any provision of the Act. So far as Section 12 is concerned, it is confined to other categories of marriages and is not applicable to one solemnised in

Sq Ldr C. Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Subject : MRTP

and hence could not be promoted to the next rank after retirement. 11. As regards the applicability of Air Force Act, 1950, Sec. 26 of the Reserve and Auxiliary Air Force Act,1952 lays down the conditions of applicability. It clearly … promoted to the rank of Squadron Leader on 14.1.2000 on completion of 12 years service. On attaining the age of 57 years, the applicant was … the rank of Wing Commander and consequential retrial benefits. The writ petition was transferred to this Tribunal under Sec.34 of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007 and the same has been registered as Transfer Application No. 144

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by … if any, is liable to be stayed Under Section 17(5), 19(3) & 13 read with the Proviso to Section 12 and Sections 13, 9, 8, 6, 5 & 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (as amended

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

Secretary & Anr., 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1116, wherein it has been held as under: - “45. The Air Force after due sanction of the President of India itself brought a policy into force for recruitment of women. … virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except in

Harikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj419

Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … cognizance thereof has already been taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand … the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … connection with the outside world for a long time.19. On 25.4.1979 charge was conveyed to the appellant.20. Between 12.6.1979 and 16.6.1979 with one holiday in between, the appellant was interrogated. The interrogators did not face the appellant