Advanced Search Results

Jsw Energy Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

retrenchment had led to that dispute, but does not include any such person;(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … to be done and as such, this Court ought not to - 118 - intervene at such a pre-mature stage. On the basis of the … that Respondent No.2 was working in a managerial cadre and was not a ‘workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ID Act’ for brevity). 11.5. Respondent No.1-Government

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … (4) of Section 117 expressly provides that where a court-martial is dissolved, the accused may be tried again. Section 118 confers upon a general court-martial the power to try any person subject lo the Army Act for any

Balmiki Singh Vs. Mathura Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 10, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1968All259

respondents made in the trial Court was illegal. This contention is without force in view of the specific wording of Order X, Rule 2, which … disputed plots and became an adhivasi on the enforcement of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. They alleged that Ram Govind died subsequently and as his heirs the respondents became the adhivasis of the … Rai's case : AIR1929All446 also cannot, therefore, help the appellant.15. (1905) 2 All LJ 777 (supra) dealt with Section 118 of the old Civil Procedure Code. This was a case relied upon by the learned counsel for the … counsel. For this he relies on Abdul Aziz v. Mariyam Bibi : AIR1926All710 Rajunder Narain Rae v. Bijai Govind Singh, (1837-41) 2 Moo Ind AMP

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its General Manager, North Eastern Railwa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR536]

dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject 10 the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … order was, ''Whether the employees were justified in terminating the services of 118 female workers w.e.f. 28.5.1984 If not, to what relief were the workers … piece rated basis. The action of the respondents in closing the establishment without complying with the provision of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, was patently erroneous and volatile of the provisions of the. Act. The

Preman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 25 and 26

Reported in : AIR1999Ker93

the Act. 1925 has stood the test of the time and is continuously existing in the Act. In AIR 1993 SC 477 :(1993 Lab IC 129) Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has … in Sub-section (1) or any other law for the time being in force, the provisions of this Part shall constitute the law of India in … the statute book. Moreover, after the commencement of the Indian Constitution in 1950, it is contended that a pre-constitution statute can remain in operation only … respondent in O.P. No. 16501 of 1996. The petitioners in both the Original Petitions are Christians. Aggrieved against Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, they have filed the Original Petitions to declare the said provision as

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … because of his not being associated with the proceedings of the Court of Inquiry from its very inception. 118. The question, therefore, is as to whether Rule 156(2) is mandatory or not and, if Rule 156(2) is

S. Sundarajan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 189; Air Force Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 15 and 48(B)

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi29; 1970CriLJ213; 6(1970)DLT1; AIR 1970 Del 29

Matched in: Citation AIR1970Delhi29; 1970CriLJ213; 6(1970)DLT1; AIR 1970 Del 29

State Vs. Sm. Tugla

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1955All423; 1955CriLJ1111

prescribed. In -- 'Chhotu v. King Emperor' AIR 1950 Nag 158 (G) such an order was held … and was not required to obey it. It has been held in -- 'Jainath pati v. Ramlakhan Prasad', AIR 1929 Pat 505 (A) and -- 'Satya Charan Dei v. Emperor' : AIR1930Cal63 that such an order binds … Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Penal Code have been in force for more than fifty years. If in all this period of fifty … for the passing of such an order as a substitute for, or in addition to, an order under Section 118. An enquiry under Section 145, is simpler than an enquiry under Section 107 of the Code. A person … throwing away Sob Nath's articles kept inside the house. One of the acts of possession done by Sob Nath was to keep his goods inside

Chandan Lal Joura Vs. AmIn Chand Mohan Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 118; Evidence Act -Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rules 18 and 21 - Order 17, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1960P& H500

plaint, that was sufficient to shift the onus on to the plaintiff.(12) In Sunder Singh v. Khushi Ram, AIR 1927 Lah 864, Tek Chand, J. also held that where, in a suit on a promissory note, plaintiff … defendant and the partnership firm had been dissolved on 5th of May, 1950, and at the time of taking of the accounts there was no … Rs. 30,000/- was borrowed in cash without interest and the plaintiff was forced to admit that it was incorrect, it must be held that initial … Negotiable Instruments Act, it was for the defendants to rebut the presumption that the pronote was for consideration. Section 118(a) is as under:'Until the contrary is proved, the following presumption shall be made:(a) that every negotiable instrument was

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

Secretary & Anr., 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1116, wherein it has been held as under: - “45. The Air Force after due sanction of the President of India itself brought a policy into force for recruitment of women. … virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except