Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 40; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 46, 103 and 104

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

Advocate was the only available officer. 5. The respondent-Rajkumar filed post confirmation petition under Section 161(2) of the Air Force Act, 1950 (in short the 'Air Force Act') on 30.1.2000 and the same was rejected by the Central Government on … of GCM - Order of HC set aside - Appeal allowed - AIR FORCE ACT, 1950.[C.A. No. 45/1950]. Section 114: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Composition of General Court Martial (GCM) Eligibility of a member

Corporal S. Arun Vs. the Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the date of final verdict, whereby he was found guilty of three charges under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing civil offences under Sections 304A, 338 and 279 of the Indian Penal Code and was accordingly … can be used only as a convenient ratiocinative aid in assessment of evidence, in drawing permissive inferences under Section 114 of the Evidence Act from the circumstances of the particular case, including the constituent circumstances of the accident,

Sukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664

Section 3(xi) of the Army Act which reads as follows:(xi) 'the Forces' means the regular Army, Navy and Air Force or any part of any one or more of them; 12. This Court also referred 7to Section 4(1) … considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court … Notification relates to certain amendments in Sections 3, 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1) of the said Act. In the above judgment, this Court

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … the proceedings of the Court of Inquiry, i.e., from the commencement of the proceedings until the proceedings end. 114. In order to put it a little differently, Para 790 comes into effect when, during the progress of

N. Ranga Rao Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 10, 18, 19, 22, 191 and 192; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 49 and 75; Constitution of India - Articles 33, 53, 53(1), 73, 73(1), 74, 74(1), 75, 77(1), 77(3), 161(1), 161(2), 162, 166(3), 226 and 309; Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Produce and Livestock and Markets Act, 1966; Defence Service Regulations, 1962 - Regulation 103; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 16-A, 16-B, 16B(1) and 16B(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ1AP

Art. 73 of the Constitution. Item 2 of the Union List (List I) pertains to Navy, Military and Air Force and any other armed forces of the Union and thereby empowers the Union to deal with the subject … appointing authority of the appellant is the President of India by operation of S. 10 of the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), for short, 'The Act'. Therefore, we hold that executive action of the Union of India … Order No. 51 dated 16th August, 1984 but its result is inconsequential. Section 114(c) of the Evidence Act permits to draw presumptive evidence that official

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that, … No.213240, NEAR GAYATHRI TEMPLE, 2 KUPPUSWAMY MUDALIAR L O., BANGARPET - 563 114.5. SRI RAJESH KUMAR R S/O RAMACHANDRAN R AGED ABOUT29YEARS STAFF No.213239 #

Baboo Halwai Vs. Mirzapur Electric Supply Co. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Supply (Licensed Undertaking War Cost) Order; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4 and 4(3)

Reported in : AIR1959All220

has been paying it without demur since .1944. The Constitution came into force in January 1950, so that it is too late in the day … regard to a particular matter. A. K. Gopalan v. District Magistrate, Malbar AIR 1949 Mad 596 was a case under the Madras Maintenance of Public … of the Calcutta High Court, is another relevant case. That was a case under the West Bengal Security Act, 1950. Their Lordships laid down that it was not enough to say that the authority was satisfied that an … invalid.The respondents on the other hand contend that the omission complained of is not fatal and that under Section 114 of the Evidence Act the Court should presume that before passing his order the Governor considered the relevant

Rullia Ram Hakim Rai Vs. S. Fateh Singh S. Sham Sher Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Administration of Evacuee Property Act; Estate Punjab Urban Rent Registration Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 114; Indian Limitation Act - Sections 28; Indian Companies Act; Delhi Rent Restriction Act

Reported in : AIR1962P& H256

High Court in Vasudeva Udpa v. Krishna Udpa, ILR 44 Mad 629: AIR 1921 Mad 418. The latest decision of the Madras High Court is … due.' This Act was amended in the year 1958 and came into force early in 1959. In the amending Act, the corresponding provision is contained … the decisions of this Court and other High Courts on Section 48 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 in support of his contention. Section 48 is in these terms:'Any sum due to the State Government or … It is, therefore, in consonance with this intention that the proviso was enacted. It is nothing more than Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act enacted in a mandatory form to relieve against forfeiture. The object of

Chittaranjan Das Vs. Durgapore Project Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentice Act, 1961 - Section 18; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 99CWN897,(1996)IIILLJ188Cal

does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950. or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957:or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or … was further submitted that a presumption of correctness of the official Act should be drawn in terms of Section 114(e) of the Indian Evidence Act and reliance in this connection may be made to AIR 1964 SC 224,

D.D. Jaishi Ram Co. Vs. Dominion of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72

Reported in : AIR1953P& H83

note will prevail.16. In -- 'Mafat Lal Gogal Bhai v. B. B. & C. I. Ry. Co. Ltd.', AIR 1931 Cal 489, it was held that if the consignor of goods agrees that the condition of the … of Mr. Mani Ram, Subordinate Judge. First Class, Amritsar, dated 14th January 1950, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for the recovery of Rs. 6,343-12-0.2. Four bales … direction, the Railway Administration does not disclose any further particulars, a presumption will be drawn against them under Section 114, Evidence Act. But if the Railway Administration has made further particulars and no inference can be drawn from … previous risk note 'B' and not the one that is now in force.25. In -- 'Ganesh Das-Bisheshwar Lal v. East Indian Rly. Go.', 6 Pat