Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 111 · Page 1 of about 337 results (0.095 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … The Judge Advocate always represents the Chief Legal Advisor in a Court Martial as per the provisions of Section 111. Thus, the prosecution had the aid of a prosecutor as well as a Judge Advocate whereas in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1995

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of the said General Court Martial … The Judge Advocate always represents the Chief Legal Advisor in a Court Martial as per the provisions of Section 111. Thus, the prosecution had the aid of a prosecutor as well as a Judge Advocate whereas in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1987

Sahab Dayal Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 111; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 43(1) and 43(2)

Reported in : ILR1987Delhi172; 1987LabIC843

District Court Martial on the charges mentioned therein and the second order was under Section Iii of the Air Force Act read with Rule 43 (3) of the Rules convening the District Court Martial for the trial of the … of Court Martial including District Court Martial. The power to convene a District Court Martial is contained in Section 111 which provides that such a Court Martial may be convened by an Officer having power to convene a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 2010

R. Suresh Babu Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

sent the petitioner to CH, AF, Bangalore in February 1996 which is gross violation of Section 47 of Air Force Act, 1950. 2(c)The petitioner got discharged from hospital as a normal case having no abnormality found, routed back to MTTI, … requested him for his promotion under the new promotion policy. The third respondent replied vide letter No.MTTI / 111/3/P1 (Trg), dated 11th December 2002, stating that the petitioner has not fulfilled certain pre-requisite conditions to be eligible

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … affects his character or service reputation and producing any witnesses in defence of his character or service reputation. 111. In the face of sub-Rule (2) of Rule 156 of the Air Force Rule, 1969, there can be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2008

The Executive Engineer, No. 1, Hemavathi Right Bank, Nala Division, Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-29-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 25B and 25F; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6N; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Industrial Employment Standing Order, 1946; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 226, 309 to 311 and 372

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ513Kant

retrenchment has led to mat dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … peace. He relied on a decision reported in AIR 1949 Federal Court 111 and submitted that the Industrial Tribunal's rights are not fettered by any … that decides the issue as to whether it is industry or not within the meaning of definition of Section 2(j) of the Act Under Section 2(k) of the Act the 'industrial dispute' is defined and all disputes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1982

Cpl. Gokul Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-1982

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1223

petitioner that he was likely to be tried for offences under Sections 40A and 71 of the Indian Air Force Act (No. XLV of 1950) (for short 'the Act' herein). Thereafter, the petitioner made representation on June 24. 1982 … for different kinds of Court-Martial. Section 110 of the Act provides for power to convene General Court Martial. Section 111 relates to power to convene a District Court Martial. It is correct that the charge-sheets are dated June

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2009

Emmar Mgf Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Comm ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Sep-08-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

him. 32) In the case of J. M. Desai V. Roshan Kumar AIR 1976 SC 578 the Supreme Court said “Its (aggrieved persons) scope and … the regulation it could at best reduce the burden. We find much force in the submission of Mr. Ramachandran. Without Regulation 30, the distribution licensee … parte Sidebotham, In re Sidebotham A similar expression occurring in s. 24(1) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 was the subject of construction in Sharifuddin v. R. P. Singh. The learned Judges there held that these … standi to file the appeal contending that the appellant is not a person aggrieved within the meaning of Section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003, hereinafter referred to as the Act. 7) The respondent No.2 also contests the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1998

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer … supervisor in the mechanical maintenance department had filed a Complaint (ULP) No. 111 of 1980 whereas the first respondent Shri Ramesh Kumbla who was working … the preliminary issue that the complaint was maintainable since respondent No. 1 was a 'workman', as defined in section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'I.D. Act') or an employee as defined in clause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 1968

Bhaiya Ram Hargo Lal Vs. Mahavir Prasad Murari Lal Mahajan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-26-1968

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 111

Reported in : AIR1969P& H110

the Bombay Rent Act) and in Manujendra Dutt V. Purnedu Prasad Roy, AIR 1967 Sc 1419, under the West Bengal Thika Tenancy Act. As the … provisions, for or against which there is no specific statutory enactment in force in the State. The first question on which the parties, therefore, joined … by the West Bengal Act 38 of 1948 which ultimately gave place to West Bengal premises Rent control act, 1950. Section 12 of the 1950 Act gave protection to tenants against eviction including those whose tenancies had expired. At … month of the tenancy; and (4) the notice should be served in the manner prescribed by the section. Section 111 of the Transfer of property Act enumerates the methods by which a lease of immovable property may be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial