Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records

Nasik Hing Supplying Company Vs. Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 4(1), 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2) and 105 - Order 43, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 97, 109(5) and 109(8); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 and 2002

Reported in : AIR2003Guj275; (2003)2GLR926; (2003)2PLR926; [2003]46SCL118(Guj)

to limit or otherwise affect any special or local law now in force or any special jurisdiction or power conferred, or any special form of … the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 etc. The Court specifically observed that it should not be taken to have expressed any opinion on the … jurisdiction of one Judge of the said High Court or one Judge of any Division Court, pursuant to Section 108 of the Government of India Act, and that notwithstanding anything hereinbefore provided, an appeal shall lie to the … in Jaimin J. Desai v. Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry : AIR2000Guj139 .While hearing the said preliminary objection, a Division Bench of this Court

Maheshwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Ishwari Khetan Su ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 34(3), 108, 108(1), 155 and 155(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1936; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 64 and 121 - Order 21, Rule 46

Reported in : AIR1965All135; [1963]33CompCas1142(All)

on the lines of, in fact, following the English Companies Act then in force, but when the Companies, Act 1950 was at the anvil the English Companies Act, 1948, and also the Companies Acts in force in other … of a party to the proceeding. See Ramesh Chandra v. Jogini Mohan AIR 1920 Cal 789; Mahadeo Lal v. New Darjeeling Union Tea Co. Ltd. … has, as already mentioned above, recorded the finding that both the companies had disregarded the mandatory provisions of Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956, and their action in transferring shares in the names of other persons was

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association (Govt. Approved) Vs. U ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chief Engineers etc. MES was created exclusively to meet the engineering works requirements of the Army, Navy and Air Force. Later, the notification dated 17.09.1949 was issued to deal exclusively with the civilian component of the MES till … rules- i.e. the Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel), Regulations, 1989 hereafter ("the 1989 Regulations") framed under the Army Act, 1950 and notification bearing no. SRO. 4E dated 09.07.1991 ("the 1991 Rules") framed under proviso to Article 309 of … the petitioners, the 1989 regulations were framed and brought into force under Section 192 of the Army Act. It is submitted that these regulations did

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … test the correctness of these submissions, we must examine the provisions of the Army Act relating to courts-martial. Section 108 provides for four kinds of courts-martial, namely.(1) general courts-martial; (2) district courts-martial; (3) summary general courts-martial; and(4) summary

Shivlal Mafatal and ors. Vs. Mafatlal Ambaram

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3), 12, 12(2) and 12(3)

Reported in : AIR1972Guj209

I will now refer to.5. In Dr. Kundan Lal v. Shamshad Ahmad, AIR 1966 All 225, S.S.Dhavan, J., has observed:--'Clause (e) of Section 108 is … of the suit premises was destroyed or demolished on account of irresistible force as stated in that clause, the tenant had an option to treat … landlord fails to carry out the repairs coming under S. 38(3). (West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950), the tenant is not entitled to suspension or abatement of rent. The general law does not give any … of the Act, Ex.41, dated 23-1-1957, was for consequent reduction of rent. In view of the provisions of Section 108(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, if a part of the suit premises was destroyed or demolished on

Cantonment Board, Ambala Cantt. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10; Cantonments Act

Reported in : AIR1961P& H416; [1961(2)FLR298]; (1961)ILLJ734P& H

but does not include any such person :(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … element in the modern conception of industry'. 'In specifying the purpose to which the municipal fund is applicable, Section 108, Bengal Municipal Act (15 of 1932) enumerates under 36 separate heads several things such as the construction and

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Maj. Virendrarai J. Kharod

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1987)2GLR1020

such exclusion in Articles 32 and 226. In our opinion, the Courts-Martial set up under the Army Act, Air Force Act and Navy Act are the Tribunals which would be amenable to the writs of mandamus, prohibition and certiorari … impugned order, exercised judicial or quasi-judicial functions. This is also evident from the relevant provisions of the Army Act, 1950 and Rules framed thereunder. This Court, therefore, has power to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the … could, not have referred the respondent's case to the superior military authority under Clause (b) of Rules 24(1).10. Section 108 of the Army Act provides that there shall be four kinds of Court-martial, that is to say, -

Manoharlal Rameshwardas Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3); Tenancy Law; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Propriety Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6(3) and 87; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 105; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 2(6) and 2(9); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 2, 14, 36 and 115

Reported in : AIR1959MP120

of Madhya Pradesh, 1953 SCR 476: (AIR 1953 SC 108) and Anand Behera v. State of Orissa, (S) AIR 1956 SC 17. In the first case, the Privy Council dealt with a question as to the application … KiniaYadunathsao29-3-19511951-523. It is common ground that after the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (1 of 1951) came into force on 31st March, 1951, the villages referred to in Paragraph 2 above … favour of third persons. Thereupon the plaintiff served the usual notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure for compensation. 4. The plaintiff

Chacko Chacko Kaithakuttu Veedu and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue, State o ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3, 4(3), 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245, 246 and 265

Reported in : AIR1966Ker46

dealing with the writ applications which come up before it (T. K. Abraham v. State of Travancore Cochin, AIR 1958 Ker129 (FB)); and by the Supreme Court, in appeal, in the decision reported in Abdulkadir v. Stale … to the conclusion that theimposition by the two enactments which were in force in the two areas, Travancore andCochin--the Travancore Tobacco Act (I of 1087) … represented law which is 'corresponding law' within the meaning of that term in Section 2 of the Finance Act, 1950. A Full Bench of this Court declined to accept this contention and came to the conclusion that the … as envisaged by the two enactments; the Travancore Tobacco Act (1 of 1087) and the Cochin Tobacco Act (VII of 1084) and the Rules framed