Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 40; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 46, 103 and 104

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

Advocate was the only available officer. 5. The respondent-Rajkumar filed post confirmation petition under Section 161(2) of the Air Force Act, 1950 (in short the 'Air Force Act') on 30.1.2000 and the same was rejected by the Central Government on

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … sub-paras (h) and (j). A fresh court is to be assembled only in exceptional circumstances.” (Emphasis is added) 104. Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner, has pointed out that Rule 156(2) of Air Force Rules,

Sri Debi Mata and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4, 4(2), 4(6), 15(5), 38, 52, 60 and 61; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Constitution of India - Article 245

Reported in : AIR1973Cal171,76CWN930

amended by a competent authority or a competent legislature. On the dale of transfer, the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, which provided the vesting of certain categories of intermediary interests was in force in the territories so transferred … picking or selecting any particular section. There in the Supreme Court it was held that the notification extending Section 104 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act to Patna village area affected a radical change in the policy … connection, see Sachindra Mohan Nandy v. The State of West Bengal. : AIR1963Cal373 , and also the report of the Supreme Court in the same

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … a quarrel, affray or disorder.”6. Section 103 deals with duty of commanding officer in regard to detention and Section 104 provides for interval between committal and court-martial. It reads as follows: -“104. Interval between committal and court-martial. -In

Municipal Board, Vanechand Sagarmal and 24 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilOther Taxes

Reported in : 1975(8)WLN530

Vengayil Rayarappan Nayanar v. Kutoor Vengayil Valia Madhvi Amma and Ors AIR 1950 FC 140, that it is a well understood rule of general law … Supreme Court have laid down the law as follows in State of Bihar v D.N. Ganguly and Ors. AIR 1958 SC 1018 with reference to the provisions of Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,-It is … also reliance has been placed by Mr. Parekh. There is thus no force in the argument which Mr. Parekh has advanced against the view which … It is not in dispute that the State Government issued notification Ex. 1 dated April 5, 1973 under Section 104 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as 'as Act', which was published in the State

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … quarrel, affray or disorder.” 6. Section 103 deals with duty of commanding officer in regard to detention and Section 104 provides for interval between committal and court-martial. It reads as follows: -“104. Interval between committal and court-martial. -

Tamizhazhagan and anr. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ194

could rely on Item I of List II:Public order but not including the use of naval, military or air force or any other armed forces of the Union in aid of the civil power. 7. While considering the … I of 1947, the Assam Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1947, and the Orissa Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1950. We cannot agree. In our view, it will be open under the head Public Order itself to prohibit … residuary power. In Subramaniam v. Muthuswami , Sulaiman, J., observes at page 55:But resort to that residual power (Section 104 of Government of India Act, 1935), should be the very last refuge. It is only when all the

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees … in Hindustan Lever Employees Union v. State of Maharashtra, 1990 LAB IC 104.10. Having regard to the pleadings and rival submissions, the points that arise

Williamson Magor and Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Naru Gopal Laik and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ950Cal

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person: (i) Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Ltd. (Formerly known as Macneill & Magor Ltd.) Mining Division, P.O. Dishergarh, Dist: Burdwan filed an application under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Whereas the said application was heard inpresence of your counsel as

H.R. Sugar Factory Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1976 - Order 14, Rule 8(1)

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ650All

does not include any such person : i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … 1976 by making amendment in the Code of Civil Procedure by Act 104 of 1976 introduced this provision in order to avoid piecemeal trial. It … Court, Bareilly (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) holding that the respondent is a workman within the definition of Section 2(z) of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be called as 'Act'). It is also