Advanced Search Results

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

holds a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government or who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. … company. We have no hesitation to say that the Division Bench was not right in raising presumption under Section 103 of the Act in order to say that the respondent was a workman in relation to an industrial

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 40; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 46, 103 and 104

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

Advocate was the only available officer. 5. The respondent-Rajkumar filed post confirmation petition under Section 161(2) of the Air Force Act, 1950 (in short the 'Air Force Act') on 30.1.2000 and the same was rejected by the Central Government on … from Air Force Act and Air Force Rules. It is pointed out that any Rule similar to Rules 103/104 of the Army Rules did not exist in the Air Force Rules. The GCM proceedings were over. Only

R.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 110 and 153; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 102 and 103

Reported in : 1992(0)MPLJ600

Martial (hereinafter G.C.M., for short) was not properly convened as there was violation of Section 110 of the Air Force Act, 1950; assuming that there was a general authorisation to A.O.C.-in-C, the actual convening order is sent by Group Captain … whose services he may be able to procure who shall be called 'the friend of the accused'. Rule 103 provides for a counsel being allowed to defend the accused in certain circumstances. Nowhere is it provided that

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … been ordered on allegations, which were to affect the character or service reputation of an Air Force officer. 103. Close on the heels of Rule 156(2), we, for the sake of convenience, extract hereinbelow Paragraph 790 of

Rama Kant Dwivedi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal (i) and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(3) and 6N; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8); Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2526; [2005(104)FLR6]; (2004)2UPLBEC1969

does not include any such person : (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 ; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … company. We have no hesitation to say that the Division Bench was not right in raising presumption under Section 103 of the Act in order to say that the respondent was a workman in relation to an industrial

Shyamabai Wd/O Surajkaran Joshi and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan Mandir Sansth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 1, 19, 20, 47, 48 and 83; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(13) and 2(20); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1) and 129; Transfer of Property Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR294

down by the Full Bench of Gujarat High Court in Atmaram Ranchhodbhai v. Gulamhusein Gulam Mohiyaddin and Anr. AIR 1973 Guj 113 is also not a good law on the subject and the law laid down by … of Sarda Education Trust (cited supra) was holding field and was in force, there was no occasion for making a reference to the larger Bench … public trust on the strength of definition of Public Trust under Section 2(13) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 ?Similarly, Justice C.L. Pangarkar, in view of conflicting decisions, also referred following issues to the larger Bench for

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … custody any officer, though he may be of a higher rank, engaged in a quarrel, affray or disorder.”6. Section 103 deals with duty of commanding officer in regard to detention and Section 104 provides for interval between committal

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … any officer, though he may be of a higher rank, engaged in a quarrel, affray or disorder.” 6. Section 103 deals with duty of commanding officer in regard to detention and Section 104 provides for interval between committal

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … No.7514 of 2000, arising out of ID Nos.l, 82, 81, 77, 137, 103, 4, 80, 79, 78, 76, 75, 5, 10, 89, 87, 100, 6, … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,