Advanced Search Results

Madhavnath B. Tamboli Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through the Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 23; Maharashtra Released Defence Services Personnel (Fixation of Pay and Seniority) Rules, 1974 - Rules 2 and 3(9); Constitution of India - Article 309; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 10; Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Service Rules, 1982

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR190; 2004(2)BomCR836

tenure.' 8. The Discharged Certificate which has been issued to the petitioner is under Section 23 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 23 provides thus:'23. Certificate on termination of service.-Every warrant officer, or enrolled person who is dismissed, removed, discharged, … date of promotion in the Class III Cadre to the post of Maintenance Surveyor and with effect from 10th February 1987 in the post of Taluka Inspector of Land Records from the date on which his junior

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … and other members. Section 8 deals with term of the office. Section 9 deals with resignation and removal; Section 10 deals with salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other members. Section 11

Michael Villavarayar and anr. Vs. the Workmen and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(K), 2(S) and 10; Army Act, 1950; AIR Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Madras Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1962Mad205; [1962(4)FLR48]; (1961)IILLJ761Mad

but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the AIR Force Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … is based is inapplicable in the matter of the reference under S. 10 of the Act. Even a majority group of workmen can make a … contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, he comes under exception (iii) or exception (iv) to the section. Exception (iii) refers to a person who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity. Exception (iv)

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

a consequence of, that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service … Court dealing with the reference does not come in the picture at all. Reference may be made to section 10 of the said Act.34. Again, unlike the cause of action, the power given to the company to refer

N. Sivasubramanian Versus Government of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was convened by the Chief Engineer Jaipur Zone and a Staff Court of Inquiry (C of I) by Air Force authorities were held in this case. It was followed by a Departmental Board of Officers under the Chief … General Court Martial could not be conducted since the same is barred under Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950. The delay would vitiate proceedings. The petitioner would place his reliance on the following dictums: i) AIR 1990 … the petitioner was posted as Garrison Engineer from 11th January, 1981 to 10th April, 1986. The Chief Engineer MES Jaipur invited tenders for resurfacing of

C.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503

forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) are … Tax Officer in denying them exemption from payment of profession tax and the petitioners rely upon provisions of Section 27-A(a) of Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act (16 of 1975), (hereinafter referred to

Union of India Rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. Ranj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

purpose of any law referred in Section 25(1) of the PC Act. Only the Army Act, 1950; the Air Force Act, 1950; the Navy Act, 1957; the Border Security Force Act, 1968; the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the National … of the 2006 Act. The General Assam Rifles Court (hereinafter referred to as ‘the GARC’) was convened on 10.11.2016. The Respondents raised certain preliminary 2. objections before the GARC which are:1. During the Court of Enquiry and

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by … G.S. Bajwa @ Gulshan Bajwa, had filed a review application before the Supreme Court being Review Petition No. 10465/2003 in CA No. 10383/96 praying for review of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd May, 2003.

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … was posted to 527 Int. and F.S. Coy From my B.7 Jat and reported to the Unit on 10 December, 75 and stayed until 23 March, 78. On 12 Jan. 75 I had taken over from Capt.

Praveen Kumar S/O Shri Kamdev Prasad Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi), T ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC936

25.05.2006 to the said show cause notice and thereafter in exercise of power under Section 22 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 15(2)(g)(ii) of the Air Force Rules, 1969 order of discharge was passed on 09.11.2006 and … Rules, 1969 order of discharge was passed on 09.11.2006 and the said order was served on petitioner on 10.11.2006.2. Petitioner has approached this Court questioning the validity of the aforementioned two actions directing his discharge and issuance