Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)
101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)
On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … J.1. This letters patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated January 4, 1999 in C.W.P. No. 984/1996 whereby the order of the Air Officer, Commanding in Chief, dated on August 21,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...
Mumbai
Jul-07-2006
Other Taxes
Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954
2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503
forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) are … defence Department of Union of India have challenged action of respondent No. 1 State of Maharashtra and respondent No 2 Profession Tax Officer in denying … Tax Officer in denying them exemption from payment of profession tax and the petitioners rely upon provisions of Section 27-A(a) of Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act (16 of 1975), (hereinafter referred to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P.N. Sharma Vs. the Union of India
Delhi
Jan-23-1968
Criminal
Constitution of India; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(1)
AIR1968Delhi158; 1968CriLJ1059; ILR1968Delhi263
foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years. The finding and the sentence of … is dear beyond doubt that relevant provisions of the statute use three words 'order', 'finding' and 'sentence'. Sub section (1) deals with the word 'order' whereas sub-section (2) with words 'finding' and 'sentence'. The scheme of the Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Sqn. Ldr. R. Sood
Delhi
Jan-11-2008
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 37, 121 and 122(1); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(7), 16, 16(2) and 17; Army Act - Sections 19 and 122; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 365 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197(2); Constitution of India - Sections 311(2)
2008(102)DRJ52
the Armed Forces. The respondent was dismissed from service by the Central Government under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by issuing an order dated 22nd September, 1993. … Mukundakam Sharma, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 23rd September, 1999 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent was allowed with a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The appellants in the Latent Patent Appeals, the petitioner in C.W.P. 3063/95 and the petitioner in C.W.P. 4082/95
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Naraian Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Others
Allahabad
Jul-26-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 46, 71, 152, 157, 161 and 161(1) and (2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 43, 43(1) and (2) and 53(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377
2000(3)AWC2506; (2000)3UPLBEC2217
sentence of court martial is not valid unless it is confirmed in view of Section 152 of the Air Force Act. 1950. Under Section 157, the confirming authority has the power to mitigate, remit or commute the sentence, which is … D.K. Seth, J.1. By an order dated 11th December, 1998, the following points were formulated for decision, which are as follows :'(i) Whether the alternative charge
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-05-2007
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125
2007(5)MhLj419
Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … cognizance thereof has already been taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand … the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Nov-16-2006
Constitution
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226
2007(93)DRJ229
the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be … Constable Dharmender, Police Personnel of Delhi; Police, knowing such statement to be false.SECOND CHARGESECTION 45 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950BEHAVING IN A MANNER UNBECOMING THE POSITION AND CHARACTER OF AN OFFICERIn that he, at New Delhi, on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-20-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57
ILR1997KAR1810
229 of the Constitution of India and is therefore, void and unenforceable in law.27. Section 45 of the Air Force Act, 1950 provides for punishment for the officer governed by the Act who behave in a manner unbecoming of his … ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J. 1. The question raised in this present Writ Petition concern's the legality and propriety of allowing a part of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-1994
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325
1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)
- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - … further rigorous imprisonment for six months. All the accused persons were also convicted for an offence under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to suffer one year's rigorous imprisonment. Major Singh was also convicted for an offence under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »