Advanced Search Results
Shila Roy Vs. Authority U/S 8 of West Bengal Land Reforms Act
Kolkata
Aug-16-1989
ConstitutionCivil
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 18(1), 21E and 21(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; ;Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30
(1990)1CALLT65(HC),94CWN307
21E is vulnerable to Article 254(1) of the Constitution of India. Relying upon Chapter IV of the Advocates Act, 1961, particularly Section 30 thereof, it has been averred in the writ petition that as the Advocates Act has … the case of Lingappa Pechanna v. State of Maharashtra, reported in : [1985]2SCR224 , the Constitutional validity of Section 9A, besides other sections, of Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1975 ('Maharashtra Act' for short), which … the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 ('Act' for short) which debar Advocates and legal practitioners from appearing, pleading or acting in any capacity on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSona Chandi Oal Committee and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-23-2002
Commercial
Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1947; Maharashtra Bombay Money Lenders (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 9A; Bombay Money Lenders Rules, 1959 - Rule 11
2003(2)ALLMR670; 2003(3)BomCR450; 2003(1)MhLj401
Sree Murugan Financing Corporation Coimbatore and Ors., : [1992]2SCR735 , the Apex Court while dealing with T.N.C. Fund Act, 1961 and Rules thereunder noticed that the object of the Act was to protect the interest of subscribers and … a common Judgment.2. In both the writ petitions, there is a challenge to the validity of provisions of Section 9A of the Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1946 (hereinafter called as 'the said Act') as amended by Maharashtra Act … by the respondents in Writ Petition No. 3469/93.9. We have heard learned Advocates for the petitioners and learned 'A Panel' Counsel for State. The arguments
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSpring Dale Education Society Vs. Union of India and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-14-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)163CTR(P& H)537
and other documents seized during the search operation is ultra vires to section 132(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for short, the 1961 Act).3. The petitioner is a society registered under … concerned seized the books of account, FDRs and other documents. After about 10 days, the petitioner through its advocate submitted representation Annexure P1, dated 2-6-1998, for releasing the FDRs seized during the search operation. This request was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Relish Foods
Supreme Court of India
Mar-11-1999
Direct Taxation
(1999)152CTR(SC)500
Supreme Court of India S. P. Bharucha, S. S. Mohammed Quadri & R. C. Lahoti., JJ. Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 80HH Counsel: Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Advocate, for the Revenue Mr. M.S. Anam, Advocate for the Assessee - … Counsel: Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Advocate, for the Revenue Mr. M.S. Anam, Advocate for the Assessee - Sections 9A & 11: [Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha, JJ] Powers of Special Court -Distribution of moneys of Bank diverted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Modi Vs. Director of Income-tax (investigation) and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-07-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127(3), 132, 132(1), 132(4), 132(8), 132A, 132B, 132(9A), 132(10), 142, 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 148, 158BB, 158BC and 158BD; ;Indian Registration Act
(2005)199CTR(Cal)666,[2005]278ITR374(Cal)
residence at I/A, M. L. Mitra Road, Calcutta-700 017, purported to be under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'). Admittedly, in the search warrant and notice, the name of the … orders, notices which have been passed shall also be set aside and quashed.5. Mr. Som, the learned senior advocate appearing with Mr. Pallab Banerjee, the learned advocate while opposing the writ petition contends that the writ petition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohanlal Deb Roy and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Guwahati
Jun-16-1993
PropertyConstitution
Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Sections 187, 187(1), 187(3) and 197B; Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms (3rd Amendment) Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 31B; Administrative Law; Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Rules, 1961 - Rule 114(1)
summons under Rule 114(1) of Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Rules, 1951 (for short the Rules of 1961) wherefrom they could understand that respondent No. 3 filed an application for restoration of the land in question … contended that thisdefinition is only meant for the provisions contained under Chapter 9A and it can in no manner be meant for the purpose of … 1960 for the purpose of Section 187 of the Act. But Mr. U. E. Saha, the learned Govt. Advocate appearing on behalf of the State of Tripura has repelled the contention of Mr. Deb by drawing my
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCol. Mohan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Mar-26-1981
Property
1981WLN(UC)62
Col. Mohan Singh, petitioner, to Maharaja Shri Gaj Singh in the year 1961. He however retained 316 Bighas of land only in village Bicharli. The … a well mechanised farm. In-spite of these facts the Collector, Jodhpur, issued a notice to the petitioner under Section 9A of the Act, as amended upto date, on November 13, 1975 calling upon the petitioner to surrender the … 1 & 2. On behalf of non-petitioner the replies to the writ petitions were filed by the Government Advocate. The reply to the writ petition filed by Col. Mohan Singh was that the petitioner was not personally
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Delhi
Apr-13-2009
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(1) to 129(5), 129(6), 146A and 146A(2); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 110; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 9(4), 14 and 14(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 12, 35D, 35Q, 35Q(2) and 50; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5) and 83; Gold (Control) Act, 2003 - Sections 135; Customs and Excise Revenue Appellate Tribunal Act, 1986 - Sections 11; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 20A; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48(8); Maharastra Restoration of Lands to Schedule Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 4 and 9A; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6), 21,
159(2009)DLT326
Tribunal or any person legally authorised to take evidence - as encapsulated in Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 and Section 14 of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926. Here it is relevant to point out that … the Commissioner, Collector or the Maharastra Revenue Tribunal.32. The next and the last question that arises is whether Section 9A of the Act is constitutionally void as it affects (i) the fundamental right of an advocate enrolled by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited Vs. Hindustam Lever Employees Union and B.S. B ...
Mumbai
Dec-20-2004
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 3A, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 19, 25F, 25G, 25O, 36, 36(1) and 38; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 25 and 62; Constitution of India - Article 32; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code; Karnataka Industrial Rules - Rule 59
(2006)ILLJ1119Bom
The Bata Shoe Co. (P) Ltd. v. D.N. Ganguly and Ors. AIR 1961 1158 and (xviii) Tarini Kamal Pandit and Ors. v. Prafulla Kumar Chatterjee … covered by items 1, 10 and 11 of the fourth schedule of ID Act for which notice under section 9A was necessarily required; and (four) whether para 3 of the operative order of the Industrial Court was warranted … the affidavit of Bennet D'Costa in lieu of examination-in-chief was filed and he was cross-examined by the employer's advocate. On the other hand, on behalf of the employer the affidavit of Rajesh Kumar Lal, by way of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Heartland Delhi Transcription Services ...
Delhi
Jul-18-2014
Direct Taxation
the Revenue pertains to assessment year 2004-05 and relates to interpretation of Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short).2. By order dated 11th May, 2011, the following substantial questions of law were framed:―(i) Whether … section, the effect thereof and why and how it was omitted, we would also like to reproduce sub section (9A) to Section 10B, which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 with effect from 1st April, 2003, but … HEARTLAND DELHI TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. P. Kapoor, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Dhir and Ms. Bina Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »