Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 9 · Page 1 of about 12,894 results (0.263 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 2004

Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. Vs. Kri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3) and 33; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 94(2)

Reported in : AIR2004Bom387; 2004(2)ALLMR340; 2004(5)BomCR196; 2004(2)MhLj810

contended on behalf of the petitioner's that in terms of the provisions of law contained in the Advocates Act, 1961 read with the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 as well as the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies … as well as Clause X of Letters Patent and Section 8 of the Bar Councils Act, 1926 and Section 9 of the Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920, held that 'the expression, 'appearance, application or act' in or to any … the respondent No. 1 to plead through his attorney instead of an advocate, is sought to be challenged in this petition. The notice of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2009

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

advocate of a High Court' in Article 217(2)(b) have no significance after coming into force of the Advocates Act, 1961 ('1961 Act' for short), which lays down that, after the 1961 Act, there are only two classes of … authorised to make rules to regulate the admission of persons to be Advocates of the High Court, vide Section 9. The High Court is given the power by Section 10 to punish an Advocate for misconduct; the enquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1979

Sarjeet Singh Bhangul Vs. Bar and Council of Delhi ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1979

Subject : Election

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 3(4)

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi263; 1979RLR324

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section … Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section (2) or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 1982

Aparna Basumallik Vs. Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-14-1982

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7(H), 24, 24(1), 49 and 49(1); ;Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rule 1; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1983Cal37,87CWN170

Bar Council of India under Sections 7(h)(i), 24(1)(c) (iii) and (iii) (a) and S. 49(1)(d) of the Advocates Act. 1961 and she was asked to collect the enrolment fee of a sum of Rupees 250/- deposited by her … under a State Bar Council. It has also been stated in paragraph 9 of tbe said A. O. that the mere passing of LL. B. … of India that the petitioner's application for enrolment in the State Bar Council's roll to practise as an Advocate has not been entertained as she did not fulfil the conditions laid down in Rule 1 (c) as … Rule 1 (c) as framed by the Bar Council of India under Sections 7(h)(i), 24(1)(c) (iii) and (iii) (a) and S. 49(1)(d) of the Advocates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1978

Chand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-18-1978

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18(7), 18(8) and 18(9); ;Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953; Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1979P& H19

and which had held the field for well-nigh forty years before it was replaced by the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961. Reliance was also rightly placed on the observations of their Lordships in this particular context in Anant Mills' … exceeding the permissible area on or after the appointed day. Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Act laid down the procedure for the … in dispute and indeed at the stage of the Motion hearing on 25th of July, 1978, the learned Advocate General, Haryana states that the issue being purely legal, no return no behalf of the respondent-State was necessary … President of India it came into force on the 23rd December, 1972. Section 7 thereof imposing a ceiling on land holdings laid down that no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1963

K.S. Iyer Vs. Bar Council Represented by Its Secretary, H.C. Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-22-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 6 and 7; Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Bar Councils Rules - Rule 1VB

Reported in : AIR1964Mad390

recently in the district of Kanyakumari. He applied to She Bar Council under S. 25 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (which will hereafter be referred to as the Act) for admission as an advocate on the State roll. … roll. The Enrolment Committee of the Bar Council not being satisfied with the appellant's qualifications as prescribed by Section 24(1)(c) and (d) of the Act, took action Under Section 26 and by its letter dated 27th June … to get enrolled as a First Grade District Court Vakil Under Section 9(3) of the Travancore Bar Councils Act. While this entitled him to practise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2004

Amarjit Singh Kalra (Through Lrs) and ors. Vs. Smt. Pramod Gupta (Thro ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 3 to 16, 15 to 20; Indian Bar Council Rules - Rule 15; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 49(1), 50 and 58A; Land Acquisition Act, 1896 - Sections 4 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Punjab Land Revenue Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 7; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Delhi High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4, 11 and 15; High Courts (Punjab) Order, 1947 - Orders 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 145

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi41; 99(2004)DLT115; 2004(77)DRJ686

under Section 15 of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 deemed to have been adopted under the Advocates Act, 1961. It is contended in the application that the appeal arises out of the judgment and decree made by … An advocate shall be entitled as of right to practise-(a) subject to the provisions of sub-section (4) of Section 9, in the High Court of which he is an advocate, and(b) save as otherwise provided by sub-section (2)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2015

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-2015

Subject : Education

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … ABOUT58YEARS SON OF SRI RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014 … MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26589/2014 C/W W.P.NOS.3476-3479/2014 & 5661-5665/2014, 3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014, 6918-6938/2014, 11889-11890/2014, 12097-12121/2014, 13065-13074/2014, 14294- 14295/2014 & 30565-30567/2014, 14296-14297/2014 & 29363-29365/2014, 14669/2014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2023

K. Srinivas Ganiga Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-26-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

to render protection to the senior citizen, the protection should not be illusive or collusive. 1313. The Advocates Act, 1961, permits Advocates to appear before any fora as depicted under Section 30 of the Advocates’ Act. Section 30 … State of Maharashtra, 1985 AIR (SC) 389. One of the questions raised was of the constitutional validity of Section 9 A of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1975, which was couched in similar terms … UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 103. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MOHAN KUMARA D., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS REPRESENTED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1994

Devkumar G. Aggarwal Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-1994

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1994)(53)LC395Tri(Mum.)bai

by the Income Tax Deptt. where the Appellant has already filed application vide Section 245C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for settlement, and even here he is claiming the possession and ownership in the seized gold. He has … stated that he had acquired the same within the period of about 9 to 10 months, by purchasing them in small quantity to 2 to … application filed and after getting the observation, from the Bench, even as a prima facie view, the Ld. Advocate for the Appellants, who had practically concluded his submissions on merits of the main Appeal, before the Appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial