Advanced Search Results
Amarjit Singh Kalra (Through Lrs) and ors. Vs. Smt. Pramod Gupta (Thro ...
Delhi
Sep-30-2004
Civil
Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 3 to 16, 15 to 20; Indian Bar Council Rules - Rule 15; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 49(1), 50 and 58A; Land Acquisition Act, 1896 - Sections 4 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Punjab Land Revenue Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 7; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Delhi High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4, 11 and 15; High Courts (Punjab) Order, 1947 - Orders 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 145
AIR2005Delhi41; 99(2004)DLT115; 2004(77)DRJ686
under Section 15 of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 deemed to have been adopted under the Advocates Act, 1961. It is contended in the application that the appeal arises out of the judgment and decree made by … of the Intermediate and Final examinations for articled clerks to be passed by the persons referred to in section 58A for the purpose of being admitted as advocates on the State roll and any other matter connected therewith.(3) … Patel, C.J.1. This matter is concerned with rights of audience of an advocate in the Court. Such a right being in general is governed in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Vetrivel and ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Advocates Association and ors.
Chennai
Mar-21-2011
Societies
Tamilnadu Societies Registration Act; Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Election Rules - Rule 2(xiv); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1 Rule 8 - Section 91; Societies Registration Act; Companies Act, 1956; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 64A
on 11.10.2010, in terms of the provisions of Section 8 of the Advocates Act, 1961. By virtue of a resolution bearing Resolution No. 77/2010, passed … the State Bar Council expired on 11.10.2010, in terms of the provisions of Section 8 of the Advocates Act, 1961. By virtue of a resolution bearing Resolution No. 77/2010, passed by the Bar Council of India, in its … the case of elections to Houses of Parliament and Houses of the Legislatures of States, is traceable to Section 58A of The Representation of The People Act, 1951, which was inserted by the Amendment Act 1 of 1989.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Thapar Agro Mills Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
Feb-25-1997
MRTP
(1998)93CompCas170
Act. The company was also liable to deduct income-tax at source from such dividend as per the Income-tax Act, 1961, and has failed to deposit the same with the tax authorities, (iv) The company was liable to repay … written representation either from the company in reply to the applications. The advocate representing the company was told that the directors should be present at … W-50, Greater Kailash II, New Delhi. Over a period of time the total number of petitions received under Section 58A(9) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter called "the Act"), has swelled to 1029 in respect of fixed deposits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jatia Investment Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kolkata
Aug-06-1992
Direct Taxation
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74, 76 and 78
[1994]206ITR718(Cal)
Ajit K. Sengupta, J.1. In this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following questions of law have been referred to this court for the assessment year 1976-77 :'1. Whether, … that the companies had to reduce their indebtedness in view of rule 58A of the Companies Act. The Tribunal held as follows :'We have considered … merely by way of adjustments of the said loans and the share transfers.18. Shri A.C. Moitra, the learned advocate for the Revenue, reiterated the grounds on which the Tribunal has affirmed the addition of the amount of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBimala Mallick and ors. Vs. MartIn Burn Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
Apr-19-1995
Land Acquisition
(1995)84CompCas956
of the Supreme Court, viz., Padam Sen v. State of U.P., AIR 1961 SC 218, Newabganj Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR … the respondent-company and replies and counter replies have also been filed.2. It is argued by Shri S.N. Choudhury, advocate, appearing on behalf of all the three applicants that the Company Law Board has inherent power under Regulation … the "CLB Regulations"), by which the original applications of these three applicants under Section 58A(9) of the Companies Act, 1956, were dismissed for non-prosecution. The grounds for all the three applications are that the applicants were prevented
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumar Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-28-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(146)ELT438Tri(Mum.)bai
Sub-section (2A) of Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 being identical the prospective application of the provision in the Central Excise Act, 1944 stands established.30. We find … recover the amount due. For this argument he draws support from Rule 58A of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 which uses the word stay petitions.11.. … the amendments would give rise to a number of similar situations the application was posted for disposal and advocates and consultants not representing the applicants were also permitted to contribute their views on the coverage and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Sanghi & Company vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes & ...
Delhi
Aug-22-2017
Education
the payment. Mr. Narayan, learned counsel for the DT&T, points out that as far as the Income Tax Act, 1961 is concerned, by virtue of a proviso to Section 142 (2D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 inserted … to honour the bills raised by the... Petitioner for the work of special audit done by it under Section 58A of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (‘DVAT Act’) pursuant to specific directions of the Commissioner of … Petitioner Through: Mr. Vasdev Lalwani, Mr. Mukul Gautam & Mr. Mohit Gautam, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulab Rameshnath Khote Vs. State of Maharashtra,
Mumbai
Nov-27-2007
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73(1AB), 73ff(1), 73ff(2) and 78; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; Maharashtra Co-operative Society Rules, 1961 - Rule 58 and 58A; Maharashtra Co-operative Society (Amendment) Rules, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 35 and 35A - Order 8, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(1)ALLMR864; 2008(1)BomCR252; 2008(1)MhLj83
is to be read alongwith Rule 58 of Maharashtra Co-operative Society Rules, 1961 and the Rules amended by the Maharashtra Co-operative Society (Amendment Rules), 2002. … to have vacated his office as a member of the committee. Rule 58A reads as under:Bond to be executed by elected members of Managing Committee:-Every … grant any relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present petition.6. Shri Anturkar, learned Advocate for the petitioner has urged three points before us. Firstly, he submitted that when the first part of … S.R. Sathe, J.1. Being aggrieved by the provision made in Section 73(1AB) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) that the member who fails to execute such bond within
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›