Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 52 · Page 1 of about 2,250 results (0.190 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 1998

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part … cannot assume that jurisdiction under Article 142 or 129 or even under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.9. To appreciate the submissions raised at … of justice.13. According to Jowitt, Dictionary of English Law, First Edition (p. 526) a court of Record has been defined as:'A Court whereof the acts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2012

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2012

Subject : Education

behalf of the State and thus they continue to be the advocates for the purpose of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the Rules made thereunder and therefore they are eligible for appointment to the post of District Judge. … for which 1743 candidates had appeared. On evaluation of the answer sheets, 52 candidates were declared to have been qualified by notification dated 8.8.2011 and … advertisement are as under: “Qualifications and Age: The applicant for the above said post should be (a) an Advocate of not less than seven years standing at the Bar (b) must not have completed 45 years of … A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1962

Sakharam Narayan Kherdekar Vs. City of Nagpur Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-1962

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1939; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(7), 2(8), 2(24), 2(25), 2(27), 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 26, 27, 32, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 52, 56 and 65; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Legal Practitioners Act; Advocates Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Rules, 1948 - Rule 5; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 38-A, 39 and 42-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 1961; Buildings Societies Act, 1884; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Central Provinces and Berar Goondas Act; Punjab Shops and Establishments Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 73; Extension and Amendment Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1964Bom200; (1963)65BOMLR627; ILR1963Bom478

provision of this Act all over the State of Maharashtra.2. The petitioner, Shri S. N. Kherdekar, is a Advocate of this Court, and also the elected Secretary of the High Court Bar Association at Nag-pur. The Association … under the Legal Practitioners Act and now under the new Advocates Act, 1961.3. The petitioner has stated that he is practising at his own residence … of the consequences of non-registration and not sending the form as required by Section 7 is provided in Section 52(a) of the Shops Act. Under that clause if an employer fails to send to the Inspector a statement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 07 2015

B.Ashok Vs. 1. the Secretary,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

facts are that the Bar Council of India is a statutory body constituted under Section-4 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for brevity, 'the Advocates Act'). It is competent to lay down the standards of legal education and recognition … provisions of Sections 7(1)(h) and (i), 24(1)(c) (iii) and (iiia) or Section 49(1)(af) (ag) and (d) of the Advocate Act. Even otherwise, the Rule is arbitrary as it introduces an invidious classification by dividing one Class of student … Court in the matter below:1. Nittan Gupta Vs. Bar Council of India 5258/2010; 2.Rajan Sharma Vs. Bar Council ofINdia 20966/2010; 3.Janaka Raj Vs.Bar Council of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2025

The State of Karnataka vs Muneer Siddique S/O Late Mohammad Siddique S ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jan-29-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

DANAYAKANAKERE VILLAGE, TQ. HOSAPETE, DISTRICT. VIJAYANAGAR 560040. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.02.2024 IN W.P.NO.100309/2024, PASSED BY THE … K. UPPAR, AGA) AND: SRI. SHANKAR NAIK S/O LATE RAMA NAIK AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOUSE NO.255, KALLAHALLI, TQ. HOSPETE, DISTRICT VIJAYANAGAR 583201. … RMV 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU, NOW RESIDENT OF DANAYAKANAKERE VILLAGE, TQ. HOSAPETE, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-40. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:1. M.S. DIVAKARA S/O NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT AGE. MAJOR, OCC. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VIJAYANGAR, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-560040. …ACCUSED2. … collecting the prescribed fees holding that there will be deemed approval under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 [KLR Act], and some

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2004

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

well as the judgment rendered in Tax Appeal No. 3960 OF 2004. 52. The petitioner has, by way of this petition challenged notice issued under … interconnected, have been heard together and are taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties.TAX APPEAL No. 539 OF 2003.2. The appellant is the assessee who has challenged the … of Rs. 67.75 lacs with L.T.Shroff Group as being unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act,1961 (the Act) on 31/3/2000. The said order came to be challenged before CIT (Appeals) who for the reasons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2004

Jitendrabhai Chunibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-09-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 6(1), 6(5), 7, 9(1), 11, 52, 53, 53(2), 54, 54(2) and 55; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 17; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 263; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Markets Act - Sections 44; Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 307; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Special Court (Trial of Offences elating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992

Reported in : (2004)3GLR560

54, 54 (2) and 55 of Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963, Section 17 of Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961, Section 263 of Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993, Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Markets Act, Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, … Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation limits) and the Dascroi taluka of Ahmedabad district. By Government notification dated 20.11.2002 issued under Section 52 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the APMC Act' or 'the Act'), … and passed the following order recording the consensual interim arrangement :-'Learned Addl. Advocate General Mr Kamal Trivedi states that the respondent-State shall not take any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2013

Hafizullah Vs. Smt.Champa Bai JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

aside. The appellant was not entitled for a decree of eviction under section 12(1)(f) of the M.P.Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for short). The suit was also not maintainable under Order 2 Rule 2 … Para-2 (two) of the plaint. (II) That the Hon'ble High Court over-looked the settled principles of law under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, which were considered by First Appellate Court in its judgment para-23 (Twenty-three) … OF 199.Hafizullah, S/o Late Sheikh Barkatullah, Aged about 56 years, Occupation - Advocate, R/o H.No.828, Badi Omti, Jabalpur (M.P.) …. Appellant Versus 1. Shri Puran

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2012

Balraj Singh Malik Vs. Supreme Court of India Through

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

before the appointed day shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be a senior advocate; Section 52 of the Advocates Act, 1961: W.P.(C) 8327 OF 2011 Page 6 of 22.52. Saving- Nothing in this Act … very purpose of having the system is defeated and after the notifying of section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to W.P.(C) 8327 OF 2011 Page 2 of 22 as 1961 Act') on 15th June, 2011

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1976

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-30-1976

Subject : MRTP

than a candidate or political committee and (2) when they make an expenditure for a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate is not unconstitutionally vague and does not constitute a … FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (Act), as amended in 1974, (a) limits political contributions to candidates for federal elective office by … on Contributions by Individuals and Groups to Candidates and Authorized Campaign Committees Section 608(b) provides, with certain limited exceptions, that "no person shall make contributions … Bates v. Little Rock, 361 U. S. 516 , 361 U. S. 522 -523 (1960); NAACP v. Alabama, supra at 357 U. S. 460 -461;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial