Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 50 · Page 1 of about 7,833 results (0.242 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 18 2015

M. Veerabhadraiah and Another Vs. The Union of India, By Its Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ann-A and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of … and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying … by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as "the Act"). … senior advocate, may be so designated after seeking his or her consent. 50. What emerges is that even if an advocate has ability in practice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2000

Bar Council of Gujarat Vs. Vinod Harjivandas Dixit

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-03-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10-B, 14, 29 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 2 and 10; Gujarat Bar Council (Constitution and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11, 15(1), 28 and 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 233(2), 243-O and 243-ZB; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)A and 14; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 31;

Reported in : AIR2001Guj132; (2001)3GLR2280

shall be deemed to be vacated his office with effect from 22-7-2000 under Section 10B of the Advocates Act, 1961. The respondent challenged the process undertaken for the purpose of filling up the vacancy, by the letter of … State Bar Council that he had ceased to practise law and that he was not practising as an Advocate in any Court of India, forwarding his declaration and the original sanad to the Bar Council along with … service qua the petitioner'. Against that order dated 27-4-2000, the respondent preferred L.P.A. No. 152 of 2000, in which the Division Bench on 10-5-2000 while

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2018

Competition Commission of India and Anr vs.oriental Rubber Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-2018

Subject : MRTP

the strength of this decision, he contended that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 was not an unqualified right and it may be restricted “by law for the time being in force.” … permission to inspect the records (of the case) in terms of Regulation 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009. The respondent stated … Pronounced on:24. 05.2018 LPA6072016, C.M. APPL.41020/2016 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.…. Appellants Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Balaji Subramanian, Sh. Udayan Verma and Sh. Siddharth Nath, Advocates. versus ORIENTAL RUBBER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 2004

Amarjit Singh Kalra (Through Lrs) and ors. Vs. Smt. Pramod Gupta (Thro ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 3 to 16, 15 to 20; Indian Bar Council Rules - Rule 15; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 49(1), 50 and 58A; Land Acquisition Act, 1896 - Sections 4 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Punjab Land Revenue Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 7; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Delhi High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4, 11 and 15; High Courts (Punjab) Order, 1947 - Orders 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 145

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi41; 99(2004)DLT115; 2004(77)DRJ686

under Section 15 of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 deemed to have been adopted under the Advocates Act, 1961. It is contended in the application that the appeal arises out of the judgment and decree made by … Advocates Act. The rule may prescribe the standards of professional conduct and etiquette to be observed by advocates. Section 50 is a repealing provision. Section 15 of the Indian Bar Councils Act,1926 has been repealed. Section 15 of … Patel, C.J.1. This matter is concerned with rights of audience of an advocate in the Court. Such a right being in general is governed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2012

Sunanda Bhimrao Chaware and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2012

Subject : Education

Satya Narain vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225)to mean judicial service. The Advocates Act, 1961: 8. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for persons who may be admitted as advocates on … the judiciary at the lower levels would be a mockery. So article 50 of the Directive Principles of Policy states that the State shall take … effect: “2) A candidate must be - (a) a holder of Degree in Law (b) practising as an Advocate in the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto for not less than seven years on the date of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2002

Mohd. Umar S/O Bilal Vs. Ashok S/O Dattatray Nayak and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules and Orders - Sections 1 - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A, 23E and 23J

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT218; 2002(2)MPLJ139

B. Jonson v. C.S. Naidu (supra), in which validity of the amendment made in the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, by the two Amending Acts, namely M.P. Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act, 1983 (M.P Act No. 27 of 1983) … has filed this revision.7. I have heard Shri P.K. Saxena, learned Senior Advocate for the applicant and Shri G.M. Chaphekar, learned Senior Advocate for non-applicant … and thus, same is upheld - Revision dismissed. - MADHYA PRADESH NAGAR TATHA GRAM NIVESH ADHINIYAM (23 OF 1973)Section 50(4) Proviso (As inserted by Act of 2004): [Dipak Misra, Krishna Kumar Lahoti & Rajendra Menon, JJ] Preparation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1988

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

in parenthesis added by the Finance Act, 1985 introducing the following change in Section 136 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. April 1,1974 from which the CrPC, 1973 came into force. Section 28 of the Finance Act amended … Main High Court Building, Bombay 400032, when you are required to appear either in person or by an Advocate to show cause, if any, why proceedings should not be initiated against you as hitherto fore stated for … the most intelligent and shrewdest witness who had given evidence before it. 500 with one surety in the like amount. He submits that it is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1978

Bhiwa Yeshwant Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1978

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR361; 1978MhLJ589

view prima facie that this is a fit case for action against Mr. J.R. Pandey under the Advocates Act, 1961, section 45 of which runs as follows :'Any person who practises in any Court or before any authority or … placed before the Court for admission, the board in that behalf showing Mr. J.R. Pandey as being the Advocate for the appellant.3. When the matter was first called out on April 18, 1978, Mr. Pandey appeared and … just and proper.;Aswin Shambhuprasad v. National Rayon Corporation Ltd. (1954) 57 Bom. L.R. 209, Krishnammal v. Balasub-ramaniam [1938] Mad. 12, F.B., Hurchand Ray Gobourdhon Das

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1998

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … being incidental to that of admitting to practice also vested in the High Courts. However, by virtue of Section 50 of the Advocates Act, with effect from the date when a State Bar Council is constituted under the … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2009

The Chairman Bar Council of Tamil Nadu High Court and the Chairman Tru ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(5), 16, 16(1) and 22; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 2, 5, 57 and 100; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 6, 7(2), 17, 24 and 26A; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926; Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 2000; Orissa Administrative Service Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Article 14; UCO Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulation 22

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ107

practice as an Advocate, he must enroll with the Bar Council as per Section 17 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (Act No. 25 of 1961). Under the Advocates Act, 1961, which was enacted with the main feature of … the Advocates, who are members of the Fund irrespective of the period of practice and pay upto Rs. 50,000/- as a lumpsum benefit to the members of the Fund on cessation of practice. The lumpsum payment as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial