Advanced Search Results
M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-05-2025
& 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH SECTION 18-A OF THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 BROUGHT INTO EFFECT BY KARNATAKA ACT NO.23 OF 2004 (KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AMENDMENT ACT, 1998) AS … NAIDU AGED 40 YEARS S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA NAIDU ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G V & SRI. LOKESH L.N., ADVOCATES) AND1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - … -1- RIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.23086
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...
Karnataka
Jun-12-2015
Education
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … ABOUT58YEARS SON OF SRI RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014 … BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26589/2014 C/W W.P.NOS.3476-3479/2014 & 5661-5665/2014, 3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014, 6918-6938/2014, 11889-11890/2014, 12097-12121/2014, 13065-13074/2014, 14294- 14295/2014 & 30565-30567/2014, 14296-14297/2014
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunava Ghosh and Others Vs. Bar Council of West Bengal and Others
Kolkata
Sep-26-1995
Constitution
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 8, 9, 9(2) and (4), 14(2)30, 35, 35(1) and 36;; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1) and 21;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8(2), 14, 14(1), 15, 49(1) and 54;; General Clause Act, 1897 - Section 3;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 8(2) and 54;; Legal Practitioners Act - Section 13
AIR1996Cal331
petitioners that tenures of the Bar Council and its members, which is 5 years from the date of declaration of the. result of the last … the Bar Council of West Bengal which is a Statutory Body, have the jurisdiction to call upon the Advocates on its roll to cease their work and to desist from attending Court? Would such a call if … misconduct they may refer the cases for disposal to its disciplinary Committee vide Section 35(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961.'7. It is the case of the petitioners that they are all practising Advocates of this Court and their
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajkot Engineering Association and ors. and Vs. Union of India and ors ...
Gujarat
Mar-31-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A, 40A(3), 44AA, 44AA(2), 44AB, 69D, 131, 132, 132(5), 139(1), 139(9), 139A, 140A, 142, 142(2A), 246, 246(2), 269C, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272, 272A, 272B, 273, 273A(A), 288 and 288(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6G; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19
(1986)54CTR(Guj)272; (1987)1GLR3; [1986]162ITR28(Guj)
in which the respective petitioners have moved these petitions challenging the validity of section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which has been placed on the statute book by the Finance Act. 1984, with effect from April 1, … functions and duties under the Act. The authorized representatives comprise mainly of advocates, chartered accountants or commerce graduates as permitted to appear in the proceedings … Co. v. A. V. Visvanatha Sastri : [1954]26ITR1(SC) , where the court was concerned with the vires of section 5(1), 5(4), 6, 7 and 8 of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, Mahajan C.J. (as the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita Sharma Vs. Dy. Registrar, Chits Funds Society and Others
Allahabad
May-14-2014
MRTP
of the rules framed by this Court in exercise of powers conferred by Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Section 34(1) stipulates that the High Court may make rules laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate … in accordance with the Rules. The submission which was urged before the Elders' Committee was that under Rule 5 (d), an ordinary member is required to be an advocate on the rolls of the High Court, regularly
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdv.K.G.Suresh vs the Union of India & Others
Kerala
Mar-30-2021
contended that the said provision is against the authority or right conferred by Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, which speaks about the right of advocates to practice.3. Petitioner has further stated that Government of India havenotified … own earning or out of the property owned by him, shall be entitled to make an application under section 5 in case of--(i) parent or grand-parent, against one or more of his children not being a minor;(ii) a … THE FOLLOWING: WP(C):21946/2011 -2- “C.R.”JUDGMENTS. Manikumar, CJ Petitioner, claiming to be an Advocate practicing in the Pathanamthitta courts, has filed the instant writ petition, seeking
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...
Allahabad
May-17-2003
CivilProperty
Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules
(2003)3UPLBEC2042
of law with promptitude.'9. It is notable that the 'Illness slip' normally submitted is not recognised under the Advocate Act, 1961 as well as Bar Council of India Rules and U.P. Bar Council Rules and under the Allahabad High … (Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bijnor, District Bijnor). The respondent No. 5 (Raj Pal Singh) filed an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of the compensation awarded by respondent No. 2 and in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhiwa Yeshwant Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp. and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-25-1978
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1
(1978)80BOMLR361; 1978MhLJ589
view prima facie that this is a fit case for action against Mr. J.R. Pandey under the Advocates Act, 1961, section 45 of which runs as follows :'Any person who practises in any Court or before any authority or … placed before the Court for admission, the board in that behalf showing Mr. J.R. Pandey as being the Advocate for the appellant.3. When the matter was first called out on April 18, 1978, Mr. Pandey appeared and … ruling of this Court in Aswin Shambhuprasad v. National Rayon Corp. Ltd. 57 Bom.L.R. 209. In the said case, one Shambhuprasad claiming to be the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.
Karnataka
Jul-19-2002
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)
AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219
J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar … passed by the Land Tribunal, Bangalore South Taluk, in case No. LRF 5448/78 dated 22-7-1992, by engaging the services of Sri C. V. Subba Rao,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaushik Kantilal Trivedi and anr. Vs. Secretary, Gujarat Public Servic ...
Gujarat
Jan-24-2002
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 217(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 10(4); Advocates Act, 1961
(2002)3GLR83
G.P.S.C. is not tenable at all. It is required to be mentioned that, so far as the Advocates Act, 1961 is concerned, it defines 'Advocate' as under :''Advocate' means an Advocate entered in any roll under the provisions … learned Advocate for the G.P.S.C., on the other hand submitted that, in view of the provision contained in Section 10(4) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, the petitioners are not qualified for such appointment. Reference is … decided in the present petitions.3. So far as Special Civil Application No. 5859 of 2001 is concerned, the same is filed by Mr. Mansuri, who
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »