Advanced Search Results

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … ABOUT58YEARS SON OF SRI RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014 … BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26589/2014 C/W W.P.NOS.3476-3479/2014 & 5661-5665/2014, 3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014, 6918-6938/2014, 11889-11890/2014, 12097-12121/2014, 13065-13074/2014, 14294- 14295/2014 & 30565-30567/2014, 14296-14297/2014

Arunava Ghosh and Others Vs. Bar Council of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 8, 9, 9(2) and (4), 14(2)30, 35, 35(1) and 36;; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1) and 21;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8(2), 14, 14(1), 15, 49(1) and 54;; General Clause Act, 1897 - Section 3;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 8(2) and 54;; Legal Practitioners Act - Section 13

Reported in : AIR1996Cal331

petitioners that tenures of the Bar Council and its members, which is 5 years from the date of declaration of the. result of the last … the Bar Council of West Bengal which is a Statutory Body, have the jurisdiction to call upon the Advocates on its roll to cease their work and to desist from attending Court? Would such a call if … misconduct they may refer the cases for disposal to its disciplinary Committee vide Section 35(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961.'7. It is the case of the petitioners that they are all practising Advocates of this Court and their

Rajkot Engineering Association and ors. and Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A, 40A(3), 44AA, 44AA(2), 44AB, 69D, 131, 132, 132(5), 139(1), 139(9), 139A, 140A, 142, 142(2A), 246, 246(2), 269C, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272, 272A, 272B, 273, 273A(A), 288 and 288(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6G; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Guj)272; (1987)1GLR3; [1986]162ITR28(Guj)

in which the respective petitioners have moved these petitions challenging the validity of section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which has been placed on the statute book by the Finance Act. 1984, with effect from April 1, … functions and duties under the Act. The authorized representatives comprise mainly of advocates, chartered accountants or commerce graduates as permitted to appear in the proceedings … Co. v. A. V. Visvanatha Sastri : [1954]26ITR1(SC) , where the court was concerned with the vires of section 5(1), 5(4), 6, 7 and 8 of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, Mahajan C.J. (as the

Sunita Sharma Vs. Dy. Registrar, Chits Funds Society and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : MRTP

of the rules framed by this Court in exercise of powers conferred by Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Section 34(1) stipulates that the High Court may make rules laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate … in accordance with the Rules. The submission which was urged before the Elders' Committee was that under Rule 5 (d), an ordinary member is required to be an advocate on the rolls of the High Court, regularly

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2042

of law with promptitude.'9. It is notable that the 'Illness slip' normally submitted is not recognised under the Advocate Act, 1961 as well as Bar Council of India Rules and U.P. Bar Council Rules and under the Allahabad High … (Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bijnor, District Bijnor). The respondent No. 5 (Raj Pal Singh) filed an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of the compensation awarded by respondent No. 2 and in

Bhiwa Yeshwant Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR361; 1978MhLJ589

view prima facie that this is a fit case for action against Mr. J.R. Pandey under the Advocates Act, 1961, section 45 of which runs as follows :'Any person who practises in any Court or before any authority or … placed before the Court for admission, the board in that behalf showing Mr. J.R. Pandey as being the Advocate for the appellant.3. When the matter was first called out on April 18, 1978, Mr. Pandey appeared and … ruling of this Court in Aswin Shambhuprasad v. National Rayon Corp. Ltd. 57 Bom.L.R. 209. In the said case, one Shambhuprasad claiming to be the

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar … passed by the Land Tribunal, Bangalore South Taluk, in case No. LRF 5448/78 dated 22-7-1992, by engaging the services of Sri C. V. Subba Rao,

Kaushik Kantilal Trivedi and anr. Vs. Secretary, Gujarat Public Servic ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 217(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 10(4); Advocates Act, 1961

Reported in : (2002)3GLR83

G.P.S.C. is not tenable at all. It is required to be mentioned that, so far as the Advocates Act, 1961 is concerned, it defines 'Advocate' as under :''Advocate' means an Advocate entered in any roll under the provisions … learned Advocate for the G.P.S.C., on the other hand submitted that, in view of the provision contained in Section 10(4) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, the petitioners are not qualified for such appointment. Reference is … decided in the present petitions.3. So far as Special Civil Application No. 5859 of 2001 is concerned, the same is filed by Mr. Mansuri, who

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Govindaswaminathan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 15 and 28; Government Standing Order; Constitution of India - Sections 16(1)

Reported in : [1998]233ITR264(Mad)

treating the salary as professional income was that the standard deduction available under Section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), was not granted in respect of the salary income.2. The assessee preferred … N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The assessee was an Advocate-General of the State of Tamil Nadu. The assessee is a 'Barrister and he was appointed as Advocate-General in … the same. The Supreme Court in the case of Joginder Singh Wasu v. State of Punjab : (1994)1SCC184 examined the relationship between the Advocate-General and

Damordardass Agarwal and ors. Vs. R. Badrilal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 170, 171 and 217; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(1)

Reported in : AIR1987AP254

retain papers till the fee is paid, he is not guilty of professional misconduct. Now under the Advocates Act, 1961, the disciplinary jurisdiction over advocates is exclusively conferred on the statutory authority which is the Bar Council of … by the Court under O. 3 R. 4, C.P.C., while granting leave to terminate the appointment of an advocate previously made. (2) Whether an advocate had lien over the papers of his client entrusted to him during … or attorney of any High Court, a pleader, mukhtar or revenue agent'. Section 4 of the Act recognises the right of the legal practitioners to … the completion of the cases and he should withdraw the notice dated 5-2-83, and he has no objection for the plaintiff engaging another counsel if