Advanced Search Results

R.G. Devadhar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - Rule 23; ;Constitution of India - Article 14, 162, 226 and 300A; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A

Reported in : ILR1986KAR4095

respect of Writ Petitions or Writ Appeals relatable to applications under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, wherein High Court Government Pleaders have put in appearance on the direction of the High Court and not … is liable to be quashed.3. On the contrary, it is submitted on behalf of the State by Learned Advocate General that the appointment of the petitioners as High Court Government Pleaders is purely contractual; therefore, the petitioners

Ramakanta Samanta and ors. Vs. the State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24(3); Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 42(3)

Reported in : AIR1975Ori78

Patra, J. 1. The petitioners are Advocates enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and are members of the Athgarh Bar Association. Opposite party No. 2 … be enrolled as an Advocate which should be cancelled. They also submitted an application under Section 26(1) and Section 48A of the Act to the Bar Council of India inter alia stating that opposite party No. 2 had

Smt. Nanjamma and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 5(2), 15 and 48A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR2002KAR2795; 2002(4)KarLJ6

controversy concerns claim of occupancy rights made by late Channappa under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (in short the 'Act'), in respect of land measuring 5 acres 20 guntas in Sy. No. 126 and … The writ appeal is dismissed with costs. Advocate's fees assessed at Rs. 2,500/-. Property - occupancy rights - Section 48A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - appeal claim for occupancy rights under Section 48A - there was

Anees Ahmed and anr. Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 24, 24(1), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 26(3), 28, 28(2), 29, 33A, 48A, 48AA, 48B, 49, 49(1), 49A, 49A(4) and 218(2); Advocates (Right to take up Law Teaching) Rules, 1979 - Rule 3; Delhi Bar Council Rules - Rules 49, 102 and 103; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Delhi University Act, 1922; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 21

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi440

submitted that such a power could be exercised by the Bar Council of India under the provisions of Section 48A of the Advocates Act, 1961. 62. In the foregoing discussions it is held that no full time law … arguments referred to various statutes andordinances of the University of Delhi as also the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the rules framed by the Bar Council of India and in the light thereof submitted that the … not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, Government, firm, corporation or concern. Section 24(1) of the Advocate Act specifically states that a person in addition to satisfying other conditions has also to satisfy the provisions of

Shri Eknath Shankarrao Pagar Vs. Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 48A, Section 28 (2) (d) read with Section 24 (1) (e)

No. 27 of 1996. By the impugned order, the Bar Council of India, while exercising the powers under section 48A of the Advocates Act, 1961 allowed the revision petition by exercising suo motu powers by the Secretary,Bar Council … per rules, particularly rule framed under Section 28 (2) (d) read with Section 24 (1) (e) of the Advocate Act, 1961, which provide that a person who is otherwise qualified to be admitted as an Advocate but is either

Sri Clarence Pais Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

on mulagenidar/volamulagenidar even when his application in Form 7 filed under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 has been rejected by the Land Tribunal on the ground that the land is not agricultural. Mr.Uday Holla’s … C/W W.P.Nos.43928/2012, 11966/2013, 23287/2013, 62434/2016(LR) IN W.P.No.11158/2013: BETWEEN:1. SRI. CLARENCE PAIS, AGED ABOUT84YEARS, S/O LATE L C PAIS, ADVOCATE & NOTARY, RESIDING AT LIGHT HOUSE HILL, MANGALOREF-575 001. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.2. THE DIOCESE OF MANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY

Sri. Peter J R Prabhu Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

on mulagenidar/volamulagenidar even when his application in Form 7 filed under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 has been rejected by the Land Tribunal on the ground that the land is not agricultural. Mr.Uday Holla’s … C/W W.P.Nos.43928/2012, 11966/2013, 23287/2013, 62434/2016(LR) IN W.P.No.11158/2013: BETWEEN:1. SRI. CLARENCE PAIS, AGED ABOUT84YEARS, S/O LATE L C PAIS, ADVOCATE & NOTARY, RESIDING AT LIGHT HOUSE HILL, MANGALOREF-575 001. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.2. THE DIOCESE OF MANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY

Karnataka Rajya Mandavya Gruha Nrimana Sahakara Sangha Vs. State Of Ka ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is not,- (a) a person registered or liable to be registered as an occupant of such land under section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 10 of 1962); or (b) a grantee of such … undergo a change of land use in terms of Section 14 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (‘the KTCP Act’ for short) and 3 proceedings in terms of Section 14A of the KTCP Act will … SHRI B. SIDDARAJU SON OF SHRI BASAVAIAH ... PETITIONER (BY SRI B.M.ARUN, ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING)) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT

Hanmant Bando Kale Vs. Rango Kallo Huddar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1961Kant206; AIR1961Mys206

S.R. Das Gupta, C.J.1. This appeal raises an important point of Hindu Law. It arises in this way:--2. The appellant before us is the husband of the original plaintiff. The plaintiff … be substituted in the execution proceedings. That application, was resisted by the judgment-debtor on the ground that the property in question being the non-saudayika property of his wife could not be alienated except with consent of her … without the consent of her husband.' The text in Mayukha, Chapter IV, Section X, P1. 5 and 8, (Mandlik's translation, p. 93) is as follows:'A

Chitradurga GramIn Bank, Jogi Mutt Road, Chitradurga and Another Vs. P ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rules 23 to 28-A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-A and 338

Reported in : ILR2000KAR553; 2000(2)KarLJ6; (2000)IILLJ456Kant

such findings before issuing direction for stay of departmental proceedings. - KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT, 1961.[K.A. No. 10/1962]. Section 48A: [H.V.G. Ramesh, J] Grant of occupancy right - Rejection of Form No.7 Finding of the Land Tribunal that … Bank before the Enquiry Officer. The petitioner-respondent submitted a representation dated 29-2-1996 seeking for an assistance by an Advocate.He also contended that in view of the pendency of criminal proceedings the enquiry may be withheld until the