Advanced Search Results

Anees Ahmed and anr. Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 24, 24(1), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 26(3), 28, 28(2), 29, 33A, 48A, 48AA, 48B, 49, 49(1), 49A, 49A(4) and 218(2); Advocates (Right to take up Law Teaching) Rules, 1979 - Rule 3; Delhi Bar Council Rules - Rules 49, 102 and 103; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Delhi University Act, 1922; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 21

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi440

arguments referred to various statutes andordinances of the University of Delhi as also the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the rules framed by the Bar Council of India and in the light thereof submitted that the … not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, Government, firm, corporation or concern. Section 24(1) of the Advocate Act specifically states that a person in addition to satisfying other conditions has also to satisfy the provisions of … quashed.14. It was also submitted by them that the provisions of Section 48-A are not applicable to the fats of the present case and in

Belapur Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Farming Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 to 98; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom231; 1970MhLJ330

of sugarcane that the plaintiffs were cultivating the said lands. Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961, however, all surplus lands of the plaintiffs, i.e. lands in excess of the ceiling fixed in the manner … of this Court in the case of Dinkerrai Lalit Kumar v. Sukhdayal 48 Bom LR 821 = AIR 1947 Bom 293 in which Chagla J., … Statement which deals inter alia with paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by the learned Advocate General that the same has been denied in paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by … State Government, subject, of course, to payment of compensation as therein provided. Section 28 of the said Act which is important for the purpose of

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Oriental Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(1), 8, 91, 194 and 198

Reported in : (1981)25CTR(Cal)75,[1982]137ITR777(Cal)

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J. 1. In this reference under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, we are concerned with the assessment years 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1968-69, for which the relevant previous years ended … the Revenue and hold that only the net income was to be included. But in this case learned advocate for the Revenue sought to urge certain additional points and, therefore, we have to re-examine the validity of … is a company resident in the United Kingdom. (Finance Act, 1965 Section 48(1)). Such a company is not chargeable to corporation tax thereon (Finance Act,

Bhoganadham Seshaian Vs. Budhi Veerabhadrayya (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 48, 151 and 153 - Order 21, Rules 18 and 19; Limitation Act 1963 - Schedule - Article 182

Reported in : AIR1972AP134

the decree. 4. The decree-holder then filed E. P. No. 21 of 1961. He showed in his Execution Petition Rs. 26.977-45 Ps. as the amount … which was tantamount to a fresh execution petition. could be ordered after 12 years disregarding the provisions of Section 48 of the Civil Procedure Code.' They noticed that conflict of views exists in the Judgments of Jorama v. … deference to the order of reference and also to the helpful arguments advanced in full by the learned Advocates on both sides, it is perhaps right that we should consider the question 'whether the amendment by including … operation of Article 183 of the First Schedule to the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.' 39. It would immediately be plain that this section imposes a

Doongarsee and Sons and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9 and 48(1)

Reported in : AIR1971Guj46

under the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 - now deemed to be registered under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The petitioners' lands being well situate, the third respondent society moved the State Government to acquire the petitioners' … only power which could then be exercised by the Government was the power to withdraw the acquisition under section 48 sub-section (1). He urged the notification dated 28th April, 1966 having admittedly been issued long after service of … case and indeed it must be said in fairness to the learned Advocate General that he did not even attempt to make such argument. The

Narayan Kisan Gade Vs. Machchindranath Kundlik Tarade and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 65

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR61

the said Act received the assent of the President on 4th May, 1961. The condition contained in Article 254 sub-clause (2) is, therefore, satisfied and … 2.11.1971. The said society is a Resource society and majority of the members are agriculturists, as required under section 48 (Explanation) read with section 2(25) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies' Act (Act for short). The suit land was … of an illegality or continuation of an illegal conduct or a fraudulent conduct of the parties.25. The learned Advocate for the appellant also relied upon the case of Sundara Gownder v. Balachandran, reported in : AIR1990Ker324 .

Kailaschand Khusalchand Bakliwal Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR449

points. The case of the State of Maharashtra in support of the Act was argued by the learned Advocate-General Mr. R.W. Adik.3. Originally the Governor of Maharashtra in the exercise of the powers conferred by Article 213(1) … Act. Reference must, however, be made at the outset to the substantive provisions in the Act contained in Sections 4, 14 and 15. Indeed the main provision which came in for a very vehement and concentrated attack … decision in Makhan Singh's case, the Supreme Court observed as follows (p. 485):.If the appellant seeks to challenge the validity of the Ordinance, rule or

Jagrutiben Babubhai Shah President Vs. State of Guajrat thr' Secretary ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 13, 15, 77(1), 77(4), 84, 84(1), 84(2), 84(3), 84(4), 144, 259, 274(1) and 274(2); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Sections 48(5); Gujarat Municipalities Act - Sections 51(2); Gujarat Panchayats (Procedure) Rules, 1997 - Rule 20; Gujarat Gram and Nagar Panchayats (Procedure) Rules 1963 - Rules 17(1) and 18; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2621

Lunavada Nagar Panchayat, 1985(2) GLR 1047. In the said decision, while interpreting the provisions of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961, learned single Judge of this Court had held that under Section 48(5)(a) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961, … time. I would advert to this decision at some length later.7. Appearing for the State Government, learned additional Advocate General Shri Kamal Trivedi submitted that what is required under the provisions of Section 84(4)(a) of the said

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sohanlal Jajodia

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 12(1B); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(22) and 147

Reported in : [1987]164ITR626(Cal)

accumulated profits of Rs. 12,26,206, the latter amount became a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and became assessable in the hands of the firm as deemed dividend. It was recorded that the said … a curable error which should have been overlooked by the Tribunal ' 9. At the hearing, the learned advocate appearing for the Revenue drew our attention to the following sections of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

without jurisdiction. 3, 5.1 and 5.2 of the assessment order dated 28/3/2002. 48. The position in law is well settled that once a particular order … interconnected, have been heard together and are taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties.TAX APPEAL No. 539 OF 2003.2. The appellant is the assessee who has challenged the … of Rs. 67.75 lacs with L.T.Shroff Group as being unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act,1961 (the Act) on 31/3/2000. The said order came to be challenged before CIT (Appeals) who for the reasons