Advanced Search Results

M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

& 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH SECTION 18-A OF THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 BROUGHT INTO EFFECT BY KARNATAKA ACT NO.23 OF 2004 (KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AMENDMENT ACT, 1998) AS … ANTHORIUM,. FLAT NO 301, JAIRAM NAGAR, JAKKUR BENGALURU 5600642. N PRASHANTH AGED 44 YEARS, S/O LATE A NARAYANAPPA, R/AT VSPL ANTHORIUM,. FLAT NO 301, JAIRAM … NAIDU AGED 40 YEARS S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA NAIDU ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G V & SRI. LOKESH L.N., ADVOCATES) AND1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE -

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Madar Bux and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(2) and 67

Reported in : [1983]140ITR821(Cal)

of its dissolution and not in the name of the firm. His Lordship assumed for this purpose that Section 44 of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, would apply.14. In our view, the learned advocate for the appellant is

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel a ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 131, 132(5), 147, 148, 148(2), 269, 269A, 269A(1), 269C, 269C(1), 269C(2), 269D, 269D(1), 269D(2), 269E, 269E(3), 269F, 269F(6), 269G, 269H, 269-I, 269J, 269J(4), 269P, 269P(1), 269S, 271, 271(1) and 279A; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18

Reported in : (1979)GLR413; (1979)0GLR413; [1979]118ITR134(Guj)

B.K. Mehta, J.1. These two appeals under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-II, Ahmedabad, are directed against the common order of the … refer to at the appropriate stage. 16. The above contentions were sought to be repelled by the learned advocate for the respondent-transferees by urging that the competent authority lacked the initial jurisdiction to initiate proceedings because there … 3. The IAC, Acquisition Range-II, Ahmedabad, therefore, decided to issue notice under section 269D(1) initiating proceeding for acquisition of the two sheds in question in … [1976]103ITR437(SC) . Khanna J., speaking for the Court, held as under (page 445) : 'It would appear from the perusal of the provisions reproduced above

Anant S/O. Narayan Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 44B; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141 and 246

Reported in : 1990(3)BomCR274; (1989)91BOMLR951

is (i) void for want of legislative competence and (ii) unenforceable being repugnant to section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 and section 14(1)(b) of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1976.2. In our view, the point has … out the real nature of the legislation. Specific item excludes the general.;[D] Maharashtra Agricultural Lands, (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Section 44B - Advocates Act, 1961- Section 30 - Indian Bar Councils Act, 1976 Section 14(1)(b) - Constitution of … V.A. Mohta, J.1. Section 44-B of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holding) Act, 1961 (the Ceiling

Nath Raj Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1979WLN(UC)498

the sum of Rs. 44,775/-cLimed by him.15. In Section 8 of the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 it is laid down that a written statement pleading a set off or counter claim shall be chargeable … petitioner and Shri M.M. Vyas, the learned Counsel for the Bank. A notice was issued to the Government Advocate in Revision Petition No. 608/1975 and in response to the said notice. Shri D.S. Shisodia Government Advocate has

Bar Council of Maharashtra Vs. M.V. Dabholkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 6, 6(1), 9, 10, 35 to 44 and 49; Advocate (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1975SC2092; (1975)2SCC702; [1976]1SCR306

to speak, is not the soul of wit but a sign of something different. Civil - misconduct - Advocate Act, 1961 and Advocate (Amendment) Act, 1974 - whether Bar Council of State is 'a person aggrieved' to maintain appeal … the question whether the Bar Council of a State is 'a person aggrieved' to maintain an appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act. 1961 hereinafter called the Act. 2. The Bar Council of Maharashtra on 8 … relates to the Conduct of Advocates. Chapter V contains Sections 35 to 44. Section 35 states that where on receipt of a complaint or otherwise

Roopchand Raghavji Phande and ors. Vs. Abhyankar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 2(6), 5, 7-A, 9, 10, 10-AA, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(5), 14, 14(3), 15, 16, 18-B, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 26(3), 31, 36, 36-A, 39-A, 76 and 77; Bombay Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 2(11), 2(19), 3, 15(1), 11, 12, 18, 19, 19(3), 32, 33, 34 and 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax (Validating Provisions) Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(35); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2), 3, 22(2) and 33(4); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 16; Sales Tax Law; East Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 - Rule 40; Indian Sale of Goods Act

Reported in : AIR1970Bom351

1953^ According to the petitioners the firm discontinued its business from May 1961 and the winding up of the business was done by petitioner No. … and Commr. of Income-tax v. Angidi Chettiar. : [1962]44ITR739(SC) . and distinguished those cases on the ground that Section 44 of the Income-tax Act set up a machinery for assessing the tax liability of firms which had discontinued … is alleged in the petition that on April 13, 1964, petitioner No. 1 sent a reply through their advocate contending that all transactions were not of the firm but many of them were on behalf of the

Ravindra K vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 27.03.2023 IN WP No.12567/2020 (S-RES). IN … OFFICE, BESCOM K.R CIRCLE5. B V PALANETRA S/O B VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WHITEFIELD DIVISION BESCOM WHITEFILED BENGALURU-560 0606. MANJAPPA … DIVISION KPTCL, HOOTAGALLI MYSURU - 570 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHIRISH KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; Ms. M.L. SUVARNA FOR SRI K.PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT … CESC MADIKERI5. SHASHI KUMAR H.S. RT DIVISION, KPTCL MANDYA6. SOMASHEKARA M.K. PURCHASE SECTION CORPORATE OFFICE CESC. No.29 VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE HINKAL MYSURU 570 0177. SUNIL

Smt. Kadiri Narasamma @ Menasamma vs Sri Thimmaiah

Court : Karnataka

order at Annexure-L, learned District Judge has allowed the appeal under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, (‘Act, 1961’) filed by respondent No.1. Consequently, theorder at Annexure-H, dated 20.07.2010, in HOA.CR.87/2003-04, passed by Tahsildar is … KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE URRBAN DISTRICT.3. SRI RAJA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAPPA, RESIDING OF RACHANAMADU VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, … R/AT NO.45, GUNDU RAO QUARTERS, MAGADI ROAD, DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI ABHINAY Y T, ADVOCATE FOR SRI KARTHIK V, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O VENKATARAMAPPA, RESIDING OF RACHANAMADU VILLAGE,

Adi Pherozshah Gandhi Vs. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 37 and 38; Chartered Accountants' Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91, 92 and 112;

Reported in : AIR1971SC385; (1970)2SCC484; [1971]1SCR863

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal.No. 2259 of 1969. Appeal under s. 38 of the Advocate's Act, 1961 from the order dated October 26, 1969 of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India in … Section 43 provides for making of orders as to costs by the disciplinary committee of a Bar Council. Section 44 gives powers of review to the disciplinary committee of a Bar Council. Section 48A, in Chapter- VI, deals