Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 42 · Page 1 of about 3,544 results (0.223 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 05 2025

M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-2025

& 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH SECTION 18-A OF THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 BROUGHT INTO EFFECT BY KARNATAKA ACT NO.23 OF 2004 (KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AMENDMENT ACT, 1998) AS … HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. MANMOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, AND ALSO AS GPA HOLDER OF MR. DEVARAJ AND OTHERS ...PETITIONER … NAIDU AGED 40 YEARS S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA NAIDU ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G V & SRI. LOKESH L.N., ADVOCATES) AND1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1967

Motsingh Vs. Bhaiyyalal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-1967

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 58(2) and 191(1); Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100(1); Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1962 - Sections 50, 53(2), 83, 84, 87, 88 and 90-A

Reported in : AIR1968Bom370; (1968)70BOMLR257; 1968MhLJ313

November 1962. In view of the provisions of Section 83 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 (Maharashtra Act No. V of 1962), hereinafter called the Act he has been the ex-officio Chairman of two … entirely independent entity within the sphere of a district so far as its constitutional existence was concerned. Under Section 42, office-bearers like the President and the Vice-President have to be elected by the Parishad. There was nothing in … costs.Reasons for the findings.(6) Issue No. 1(a) - According to Mr. Dharmadhikari Advocate for the petitioner, the honorarium and allowances payable to the respondent and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1965

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1965

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 21(4), 23(1) and 36; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

recommendation of respondent 2 was accepted by respondent 1 on March 28, 1961. Pursuant to the order of respondent 1, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) respondent … of respondents 1 to 3. It is pointed out that some land-owners of the village made applications under Section 42 of the Act praying that as they had not been given well-irrigated area in lieu of such area … learned Judge had no choice but to grant the relief prayed for by the petitioners. The learned Deputy Advocate-General, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, pressed into service Laxman Purshottam Pimputkar v. State of Bombay, AIR 1964

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 2004

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

income belongs to a person other than person searched; 3605 OF 2004. 42. This petition challenges the notice issued under Section 158BD of the Act … interconnected, have been heard together and are taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties.TAX APPEAL No. 539 OF 2003.2. The appellant is the assessee who has challenged the … of Rs. 67.75 lacs with L.T.Shroff Group as being unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act,1961 (the Act) on 31/3/2000. The said order came to be challenged before CIT (Appeals) who for the reasons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1968

Sarat Chandra Biswal and anr. Vs. Surendra Mohanty, Editor kalinga and ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-07-1968

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 4 and 5; Advocate Act, 1941 - Sections 49; Advocate Rules - Rules 3, 4 and 15

Reported in : AIR1969Ori117; 1969CriLJ763

Deputy Minister in the previous Government and Sri Dinabandhu Sahu, Sri Raghunath Das and Sri S. F. Ahmad, Advocates of this High Court. In Original Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3 of 1968, the opposite parties on whom … themselves. In support of this stand they relied on Rule 15 framed under Section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961.16. The explanation on behalf of the newspaper 'Kalinga'--The Editor, Printer and Publisher against whom notices were issued to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2026

Smt. Kadiri Narasamma @ Menasamma vs Sri Thimmaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-27-2026

order at Annexure-L, learned District Judge has allowed the appeal under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, (‘Act, 1961’) filed by respondent No.1. Consequently, theorder at Annexure-H, dated 20.07.2010, in HOA.CR.87/2003-04, passed by Tahsildar is … R/AT NO.45, GUNDU RAO QUARTERS, MAGADI ROAD, DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI ABHINAY Y T, ADVOCATE FOR SRI KARTHIK V, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O VENKATARAMAPPA, RESIDING OF RACHANAMADU VILLAGE,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2024

Karnataka Employers Association vs All India Trade Union Congress (R)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2024

R-2, SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-3) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED PETITION NO.3632/2023 (L-MW) AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE … TEMPLE ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 004 A CHARITABLE TRUST REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS HONARARY SECRETARY … 560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI SHANTHARAJU S/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI SUBBA RAO G.S., ADVOCATE) AND:1. ALL INDIA TRADE … SHOP AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES, REPRESENED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI D.B. ASHOK ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI S.S. NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI B.C. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. ALL INDIA TRADE UNION CONGRESS (R) KARNATAKA STATE COMMITTEE, NO.6, SIRUR PARK

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1998

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part … cannot assume that jurisdiction under Article 142 or 129 or even under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.9. To appreciate the submissions raised at … the Supreme Court of India under Section 38 of the Act.67. Section 42(1) of the Act confers on the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1962

V. Padmanabha Ravivarma Rajah and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-08-1962

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 226; Madras District Boards (Amendment) Act 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Kerala District Boaeds (Amendment) Act, 1958; Madras District Boards Act, 1920 - Sections 78, 79 to 86; Travancore-Cochin Land Tax Act, 1955 - Sections 11 and 12

Reported in : AIR1963Ker31

with that expressed by this Court in (Petns. Nos. 13 to 24, 42 and 46 to 54 of 1958), D/.- 9-12-1960): AIR 1961 SC 552). … very strongly on the decision of the Supreme Court, reported in T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala, 1961 Ker LJ 143 : (AIR 1961 SC 552). That decision, as mentioned earlier, was given in the attack … therefore, Kerala Act 4 of 1958 is an invalid piece of legislation. On the other hand, the learned Advocate General, appearing for the State, has sustained the levy under the Act, in question, as a levy which … the petitioner that originally the land cess is levied by virtue of Section 78 of Madras Act 14 of 1920 as it originally stood and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1979

Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, c Ward and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-16-1979

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80E and 154; ;Finance Act, 1965

Reported in : [1981]130ITR710(Cal)

for the special deduction under Section 80E of the I.T. Act, 1961. 13. Mr. R. N. Bajoria, learned advocate for the appellant, contended before us that there was no mistake at all in computing the profits and … or about the 27th February, 1970, respondent No. 1 completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961, whereby the overall total income of the appellant was computed at Rs. 2,21,29,146 after allowing development rebate on … on the 24th December. 1975, 'taking an entirely different and contrary view. 42. In the above facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial