Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 39 · Page 1 of about 2,725 results (0.169 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 21 2010

High Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr.N.B.Deshmukh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : CONTEMPT OF THE COURT ACT, 1971 - Section 2(C); MAHARASHTRA LAND REVENUE CODE, 1966 - Sections 38, 39, 149, 156, 328, 2(11); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226, 227

The statutory right of the Advocate to practice conferred by the section 29 & 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 to uphold and duly assist in the due & proper administration of justice according to law by the … AS SADDLED AND CAST ON THE SATURILY GOVT. LESSOR BY THE MANDATORY STATUTORY PROVISIONS OF THE SECTIONS 38, 39, 149, 156, 328, 2(11) OF THE MAHARASHTRA LAND REVENUE CODE, 1966 AND DISPOSAL OF GOVT. LANDS RULES r/w

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1998

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … factor in determining what punishment, in a given case, would be appropriate. 39. Suspending the licence to practice of any professional like a lawyer, doctor, … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part … cannot assume that jurisdiction under Article 142 or 129 or even under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.9. To appreciate the submissions raised at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2000

Kota Co-operative Agricultural Bank Limited, Kota Vs. State of Karnata ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-25-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 122, 129 and 144 - Order 3, Rules 4(1), 4(6) and 5 (Karnataka Amendment dated 9-2-1967); High Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959 - Rules 2, 3 (1) & (2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16(2), 29, 30, 33 and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 124(4), 226 and 227; Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 29-G(6) and 57(2); Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 14; Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39; Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958; High Courts Act, 1951

Reported in : AIR2001Kant36; ILR2000KAR3063; 2001(2)KarLJ188

to file the objection statement as against an Interlocutory Application under Order 39 of the CPC, that it is well-settled practice of the Court that … the petitioner on record Sri K.M. Nataraj had orally sought for permission to engage the services of another Advocate, Sri A.G. Holla (as he then was) to argue the matter on his behalf. Such a situation in … designated by this Court in exercise of the powers conferred on it under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961.3. This is how a sub-issue had cropped up before me in the above writ petitions. I do understand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 25 1979

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel a ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-25-1979

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 131, 132(5), 147, 148, 148(2), 269, 269A, 269A(1), 269C, 269C(1), 269C(2), 269D, 269D(1), 269D(2), 269E, 269E(3), 269F, 269F(6), 269G, 269H, 269-I, 269J, 269J(4), 269P, 269P(1), 269S, 271, 271(1) and 279A; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18

Reported in : (1979)GLR413; (1979)0GLR413; [1979]118ITR134(Guj)

B.K. Mehta, J.1. These two appeals under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-II, Ahmedabad, are directed against the common order of the … to the decision of the competent authority for initiation of the proceedings. 39. Re : question No. 4 : We do not feel any doubt … refer to at the appropriate stage. 16. The above contentions were sought to be repelled by the learned advocate for the respondent-transferees by urging that the competent authority lacked the initial jurisdiction to initiate proceedings because there … 3. The IAC, Acquisition Range-II, Ahmedabad, therefore, decided to issue notice under section 269D(1) initiating proceeding for acquisition of the two sheds in question in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1976

Udayan Chinubhai and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-27-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5

Reported in : [1978]111ITR584(Guj)

not covered by any other head of income under Act of 1922. Under section 56(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income from dividends had been specifically made chargeable as income which is to be computed under the head … in Seth Motilal Manekchand's case : [1957]31ITR735(Bom) which is binding upon us.' 39. In view of what has been stated in Himatsingka's case [1962] 62 … to the said joint Hindu undivided family. Under the terms of the consent decree, Shri K. M. Munshi, advocate, was appointed the sole arbitrator and it was director by the court that the defendants were not entitled

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2001

Nimba Yadav Bhoi Vs. President, Standing Committee, Zilla Parishad, Ja ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 39(1); Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1962 - Sections 96(1); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 39(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)MhLj466

nature and require strict compliance thereof.13. Referring to Section 96 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act. 1961 (hereinafter called as 'Samitis Act'), it was sought to be contended that the Chief Executive Officer is duly … R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the record.2. The petitioner challenges the order dated … challenges the order dated 20th July, 2000, passed by the respondent No. 1, in exercise of powers under Section 39(1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), and the order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2009

Bhanu Constructions Company Limited Vs. Recovery Officer, Debts Recove ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-2009

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(22), 19(23), 19(25), 22, 28, 29 and 30; Income Tax Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 39 and 39(1); Income Tax Rules - Rules 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT757

same.24. Sri Adinarayana Rao has also submitted that the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 apply to the proceedings under the RDB Act and as the petitioner had not deposited the amount specified … consideration in these two writ petitions, at the request of the learned advocates, both the petitions were heard together and are decided by this common … over Krishna and Guntur Districts, where the properties are situated. He has also submitted that even according to Section 39(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), on the application made by the decree holder, the court, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2009

The Chairman Bar Council of Tamil Nadu High Court and the Chairman Tru ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(5), 16, 16(1) and 22; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 2, 5, 57 and 100; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 6, 7(2), 17, 24 and 26A; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926; Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 2000; Orissa Administrative Service Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Article 14; UCO Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulation 22

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ107

practice as an Advocate, he must enroll with the Bar Council as per Section 17 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (Act No. 25 of 1961). Under the Advocates Act, 1961, which was enacted with the main feature of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1981

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sutna Stone and Lime Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-12-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 80I

Reported in : (1982)26CTR(Cal)343,[1982]138ITR37(Cal)

As the assessee ran a priority industry as covered by item 3 of Schedule VI to the I.T. Act, 1961, the ITO granted to the assessee relief under Section 80-I on the profits from the manufacture of limestone. … as well as 'limestone' in Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 14, pp. 38 and 39. There it has been explained that 'limestone' is a rock containing at … be disputed that the expression 'attributable to' was certainly wider in import than the expression 'derived from'. Learned advocate for the assessee sought to rely on several decisions where this expression 'attributable to' had been referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2011

Supreme Court Bar Association, and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik and A.K. Manc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Section 151, Order 39 Rules 1, 2; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Rule 3(ii)(iii)(vi)(a), 4, 5(v)(a),18, 21; Constitution Of India - Article 145 (1)(a), 19(1)(c), 136, 142, 145(1)(a ; Supreme Court Rules, 1966; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 34, Rule 2(b) (a), 12, 13(1); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Rule 6

those advocates whose names are entered on the roll of any State Bar Council, maintained under the Advocates Act, 1961, shall be entitled to appear and plead before the Court. As per Rule 2(b) certain restrictions have been … below application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code (CPC) filed in Civil Suit No. 101 … the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 3402 of 2003 is Shri A.K. Manchanda. Both the respondents are the advocates practicing in Delhi. They are members of SCBA, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Delhi Bar Association, Tis Hazari

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial