Advanced Search Results

Adi Pherozshah Gandhi Vs. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 37 and 38; Chartered Accountants' Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91, 92 and 112;

Reported in : AIR1971SC385; (1970)2SCC484; [1971]1SCR863

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal.No. 2259 of 1969. Appeal under s. 38 of the Advocate's Act, 1961 from the order dated October 26, 1969 of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India in … India.(1) Any person aggrieved by an order of the disciplinary committee of a State Bar Council made under section 35 may, within sixty days of the date of the communication of the order to him, prefer an appeal

Arunava Ghosh and Others Vs. Bar Council of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 8, 9, 9(2) and (4), 14(2)30, 35, 35(1) and 36;; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1) and 21;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8(2), 14, 14(1), 15, 49(1) and 54;; General Clause Act, 1897 - Section 3;; Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 8(2) and 54;; Legal Practitioners Act - Section 13

Reported in : AIR1996Cal331

the Bar Council of West Bengal which is a Statutory Body, have the jurisdiction to call upon the Advocates on its roll to cease their work and to desist from attending Court? Would such a call if … misconduct they may refer the cases for disposal to its disciplinary Committee vide Section 35(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961.'7. It is the case of the petitioners that they are all practising Advocates of this Court and their

Narendra Singh Vs. Chhotey Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 37, 37(2) and 38

Reported in : AIR1983SC990; 1983(2)SCALE84; (1983)4SCC131

for each of the States mentioned therein. Section 4 envisages setting up of the Bar Council of India Section 35 confers disciplinary jurisdiction on the State Bar Council. It provides that where on receipt of a complaint or … remand that has been questioned in this appeal preferred by the appellant under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.5. Miss Thomas, learned advocate for the appellant, relied upon the decision of this Court in Makeshwor Nath Srivastava

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar

K. Pushpa Leela Vs. Bar Council of State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 6, 7 and 35

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD46; 1998(4)ALT828

the Bar Council of the State of Andhra Pradesh for enquiry and disposal under Section 35 of theAdvocates Act, 1961. The said Disciplinary Committee has fixed at 11-00 a.m. on 17-8-1997 for hearing of the case at the … 1. The petitioner is a practising Advocate. She was appointed asAssistant Government Pleader. While she was acting in the said capacity, one Mrs. P.Revathi, Advocate,

Devendra Bhai Shankar Mehta Vs. Rameshchandra Vithaldas Sheth and Anot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 36B and 43; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Inocme-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230A

Reported in : AIR1992SC1398; 1993(41)BLJR17; JT1992(3)SC560; 1992(1)SCALE875; (1992)3SCC473; [1992]2SCR687; 1992(2)LC303(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC803

36B under Section 43 of Advocates' Act, 1961. Civil - fraud - Sections 35, 36 and 43 of Advocate Act, 1961 - advocate and his racket fraudulently took money from complainants - disciplinary committee of Bar Council of India

S.Diwakar. Vs. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Articles 226

respondents 2 and 3 lodged a complaint with the first respondent-Bar Council under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Bar Council sent a copy of the complaint to the petitioner and the petitioner submitted a reply … on her behalf and on behalf of the third respondent, who is her son.3. The petitioner is an Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu. He is practising in various Courts in the City and

D.D. Choudhari Vs. H.i. Kalyani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35

Reported in : (1997)10SCC393

whereby the appellant has been reprimanded for committing a misconduct in proceedings under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The appellant is a practising advocate at Jalgaon. He is enrolled with the Maharashtra Bar Council. On 17-12-1974,

Smt. Muniyamma and anr. Vs. S. Chandrakar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35(3); Evidence Act - Sections 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 1

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2863; 2008(3)KCCR1576; 2008(4)AIRKarR360; AIR2008NOC2492; 2008AIHC2981(Kar)

Disciplinary Committee-III of the Karnataka State Bar Council, REPRIMANDING advocate 'x' as per Section 35(3)(b) of the Advocates Act, 1961.10. From the said proceedings, it is clear that the petitioners have clearly established that there was fraud and

Hikmat Ali Khan Vs. Ishwar Prasad Arya and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalMiscellaneous

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307; Arms Act - Sections 25;

Reported in : AIR1997SC864; JT1997(2)SC182; (1997)2MLJ84(SC); 1997(1)SCALE557; (1997)3SCC131; [1997]1SCR632

Chairman; Bar Council of U.P., for taking action against respondent No. 1 under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). On the basis of the said complaint disciplinary proceedings (D.C. Case No. … ORDERS.C. Agrawal1. Ishwar Prasad Arya, respondent No. 1, was registered as an advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and was practising at Badaun. An incident took place on May