Advanced Search Results

indra Bahadur Singh Vs. Bar Council of U.P., Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 34, 49 and 49(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 220; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1986All56

and 21 of the Rules framed by the Bar Council of India under Section 49(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961 regulating professional conduct and etiquette specifically lay down that an Advocate shall not stipulate for a fee contingent … the other hand such a rule could, if at all, be framed only by the High Court under Section 34 of the Act. To appreciate this argument it would be useful to quote the relevant portion of Section

Arvind N. Savani Vs. Maganlal Savani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

supervision of the court over pleaders as well as their clients. 18. Under Section 34 of the Advocates Act 1961 the High Court may make rules in this regard. 19. The rules of the Original Side of the … Chamber Order that the firm has not given him the NOC for filing the Vakalatnama of the new advocates, whom defendant No.1 seeks to appoint, on the ground of non payment of certain outstanding fees as shown

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these … competence of the Bar Council of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these Rules are unreasonable and arbitrary and hence violative … automatically become entitled as of right to practise full-fledged in any Court including the Supreme Court. Next follows Section 34, Sub-section (1) which provides that :(1) The High Court may make Rules laying down the conditions subject to

Sadat Mirkhan Dalmirkhan Vs. Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34(1); Advocates Rules - Rule 9(2) and 9(4)

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR437; (1995)97BOMLR806

is whether a Criminal Court is empowered to determine the Vakalatnama of an advocate. The provisions of Advocates Act, 1961 and the rules framed by the Bar Council of India are in respect of the misconduct of the … of the misconduct of the advocates and punishment therefor. According to section 34(1) of Advocates Act, 1961, the High Court is empowered to make rules … the complaint of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pusad, a Criminal Case No. 120 of 1986 was registered under section 193 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. In Civil Suit No. 20 of 1972, Shri Mirza,

Dattusing Giridharsingh Rajput (Thakur) Vs. Bhagwant Devasthan and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 and 107 - Order 3, Rule 4(2) - Order 41, Rule 23A; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34; Advocate Rules - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2005Bom86; 2005(1)ALLMR298; 2005(2)BomCR290; 2005(2)MhLj743

the proceedings of the suit are terminated.14. This Court has framed Rules under Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act of 1961'). The said Rules are very relevant so far as … decide Regular Civil Suit No. 586 of 1976 in the absence of Defendant No. 1 Dattusing after his Advocate filed 'no instruction pursis'. The said suit was decreed on 30th January 1984. In so far as Regular

Prayag Das Vs. Civil Judge, Bulandshahr and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30 and 34(1); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 12; Allahabad High Court's General (Civil) Rules, 1957 - Rule 615; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 122

Reported in : AIR1974All133

law in view of the rules framed by the High Court and the Bar Council under the Advocates Act, 1961, In the alternative the argument was that the dress worn by the pentitioner on 17-2-1973 before the respondent … and Indian culture.5. There are two provisions of the Advocates Act which may be relevant in this connection. Section 34 confers on the High Court the power 'to make rules' laying down the conditions subject to which an … M.N. Shukla, J. 1. The petitioner, an Advocate practising in the Mofussil Courts at Bulandshahr, takes exception to the dress

Govinda Bhagoji Kamable and ors. Vs. Sadu Bapu Kamable (D/H. Maruti Sa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rules 4 and 8(4); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR272; 2004(6)BomCR552; 2005(1)MhLj651

refer to the Rules framed by this Court in exercise of power under Section 34(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961. The said rules lay down the procedure for withdrawal of appearance by an Advocate. Rule 8(4) of the

P. Venkatamuni Reddi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34; Andhra Pradesh Advocates Fee Rules - Rule 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Andhra Pradesh Advocate-General (Duties, Leave and Remuneration) Order, 1961 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1989AP45

writ petitions. Advocate's fee Rs. 350/- in each. Civil - right of advocate - Section 34 of Advocates Act, 1961 and Rule 12 (2) of Advocate Fee Rules - Advocate General appeared on behalf Government as respondent -

Supreme Court Bar Association, and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik and A.K. Manc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Section 151, Order 39 Rules 1, 2; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Rule 3(ii)(iii)(vi)(a), 4, 5(v)(a),18, 21; Constitution Of India - Article 145 (1)(a), 19(1)(c), 136, 142, 145(1)(a ; Supreme Court Rules, 1966; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 34, Rule 2(b) (a), 12, 13(1); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Rule 6

months of the start of such practice, it shall be deemed that he is guilty of professional misconduct. Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961 also empowers the High Courts to make Rules regarding the advocate practicing in … those advocates whose names are entered on the roll of any State Bar Council, maintained under the Advocates Act, 1961, shall be entitled to appear and plead before the Court. As per Rule 2(b) certain restrictions have been

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33, 33(1), 34, 34(3), 35B, 37, 155 and 155(5)

Reported in : (1992)107CTR(Guj)340; [1993]200ITR281(Guj)

the assessee was not entitled to deduction of the said rebate as per section 34(3)(a) of the Income-tax Act 1961, as applicable at the relevant time. The Income-tax Officer held that the development rebate reserve should be a … assessee was not pressed before us at the time of final hearing of this application by the learned advocate for the assessee, and hence this judgment will be confined to the remaining five question only. The sixth