Advanced Search Results

K. Sankaranarayana Pillai Vs. Mysore Fertiliser Company

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 3, Rule 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1974; Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1979Ker167

- Section 20 and Order 3 Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 33 of Advocate Act, 1961 - suit for recovery of amounts found due on rendition of accounts by former advocate - advocate receives

Abhay Prakash Sahay Lalan Vs. High Court of Judicature at Patna Throug ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 33, 34 and 34(1); Patna High Court Rules - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 145

appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the High Court to make rules under Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961, laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate may be permitted to practise in the High Court … whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practise. Section 33 provides that no person shall on or after the appointed day, be entitled to practise in Court or

Ravi Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT629

2nd Dec., 1991. In a suit filed by the special attorney under Sections 32 and 33 of the Advocate Act, 1961, he was permitted to verify and institute the suit but had no authority to plead the same - … holder on behalf of a principal is subject to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 in particular Sections 32 and 33. It was in this background that the application seeking permission to plead the case was

Saumya M.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the Bar Council of India Rules framed thereunder. Sec. 2(1)(a) of the Advocate Act, 1961, defines “advocate” as follows: : 'Sec.2. Definitions.(1). In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(a) “advocate” means an … context, it is also relevant to note the provisions contained in Sec. 33 of the Act, which envisages that Advocates alone are entitled to practise … make an order to suspend the Advocate from practice for such period as it may deem fit. Sub section(4) of Sec.35 further mandates that where an Advocate is suspendedfrom practice under clause (c) of sub-section (3), he

Lawyers Collective, a Society Registered Under the Societies Registrat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 29, 29(1), 30 and 31; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 24, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 30, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 45, 49(1) and 77; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1960; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 477; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 13; Consumer Protection Regulation, 2005; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Co-operative Societies Act; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926; Supreme Courts Rules; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 145;

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR32; [2010]186TAXMAN494(Bom)

profession of law. Section 29 does not confer the right to practise the profession of law. It is Section 33 which provides that advocates enrolled under the 1961 Act alone are entitled to practise in any Court or … carry on their liaison activities in India only on being enrolled as advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961 'To be specific, the question is, whether … firms could carry on their liaison activities in India only on being enrolled as advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961 'To be specific, the question is, whether practising in non litigious matters amounts to 'practising the profession of

Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Another Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu R ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

It is the primary contention of the petitioners that the Bar Council has no power under the Advocates Act, 1961 to pass such prohibitory orders pending disposal of disciplinary proceedings. 10. The impugned order was passed under Section … a restrictive meaning. It would include in the case of an Advocate, his registration also. This is because Section 33 of the Advocates Act prohibits a person from practice unless he is enrolled as an Advocate under the

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

the permission of the authority concerned, he does not practise the profession and contravene Section 33 of the Advocate Act. Section 32 of the said Act in fact permits such appearance notwithstanding the fact that the person concerned … short, 'State Commission') are entitled to be represented by authorised agents who are not enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961 and such Authorised Agents have the right of audience. The counsel appearing for the parties confined their arguments

V. Padmanabha Ravi Varma Raja and ors. Vs. the Deputy Tahsildar Chittu ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(5), 31 and 141; Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 17 and 19

Reported in : AIR1963Ker155

Ho. 1644 of 1961, Mr. K. Kuttikrishna Menon, learned counsel, on behalf of the petitioner, who is an advocate receiver appointed in 0. S. No. 56 of 1957 by the Subordinate Judge of Palghat, again seeks the … In all these writ petitions, though the petitioners are different, the various provisions in the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961, Act 13 of 1961, are attacked on the ground that they violate the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles … counter-atlidavit filed by the State in this matter.63. In 0. P. No. 3371 of 1961, the properties concerned are unsurveyed lands and the petitioners are … 1956, in accordance with the Notification issued by the Travancore-Cochin Government, under Section 1(3) of the said Act. Broadly, the Act purported to provide tor

Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. Vs. Kri ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3) and 33; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 94(2)

Reported in : AIR2004Bom387; 2004(2)ALLMR340; 2004(5)BomCR196; 2004(2)MhLj810

as otherwise provided in the said Act or in any other law for the time being in force. Section 33 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is very clear in that regard, and it reads that 'Except as otherwise … contended on behalf of the petitioner's that in terms of the provisions of law contained in the Advocates Act, 1961 read with the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 as well as the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies … the respondent No. 1 to plead through his attorney instead of an advocate, is sought to be challenged in this petition. The notice of the

Ravindra K vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 27.03.2023 IN WP No.12567/2020 (S-RES). IN … 4 years unchallenged should not be disturbed. Further in paragraphs No.30 and 33 held as follows:-"30. Thus, in view of the above, the settled legal … DIVISION KPTCL, HOOTAGALLI MYSURU - 570 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHIRISH KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; Ms. M.L. SUVARNA FOR SRI K.PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT … CESC MADIKERI5. SHASHI KUMAR H.S. RT DIVISION, KPTCL MANDYA6. SOMASHEKARA M.K. PURCHASE SECTION CORPORATE OFFICE CESC. No.29 VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE HINKAL MYSURU 570 0177. SUNIL