Advanced Search Results

Ravi Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT629

2nd Dec., 1991. In a suit filed by the special attorney under Sections 32 and 33 of the Advocate Act, 1961, he was permitted to verify and institute the suit but had no authority to plead the same - … holder on behalf of a principal is subject to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 in particular Sections 32 and 33. It was in this background that the application seeking permission to plead the case was

Yogesh Kumar Singh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Document Writers Licensing Rules, 1977 - Rules 6, 6(1) and (2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 31, 32 to 35, 32, 33, 38, 72 and 89; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), (2) and (6); Indian Registration Rules - Rules 2(10) and 300

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1004

- Rule 6 and G.O. dated 20.04.1990 of U. P. Document Writers Licensing Rules, 1977, Section 30 of Advocate Act, 1961, Section 32 (b) of Indian Registration Act, 1908 and Article 19 (1) (a) and (g) of Constitution of India -

T.C. Mathai and anr. Vs. the District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 205, 273 and 303; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999SC1385; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)226; 1999CriLJ2092; 1999(1)CTC720; JT1999(2)SC494; 1999(2)KLT156(SC); 1999(2)SCALE359; (1999)3SCC614; [1999]2SCR305

of the court to act in such proceedings. This is in tune with Section 32 of the Advocates Act 1961 which empowers a Court to permit any person, who is not enrolled as an advocate to appear before

C.M. Visalakshi and ors. Vs. K. Kuppusamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32

Reported in : AIR1989Mad27

he has not obtained the prior permission of this court as contemplated under Section 32 of the Advocates Act, 1961, since he is not an Advocate or entitled to practise as an Advocate. Mr. A.V. Raman, representing plaintiffs

Mohan H. Punjabi Vs. Vachha and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1984)86BOMLR2; 1983MhLJ895

we have set out earlier, before the Taxing Master within that time. Appeal allowed. Advocates Act (XXV of 1961), Section 32 - Word 'appear'--Connotation of-Court or authority whether can permit private person to appear and plead before them for … was rejected on October 12, 1978 on the ground that the said A. H. Punjabi was not an advocate. Thereafter the appellant took out a Chamber Summons, being Chamber Summons No. 600 of 1978 dated October 12,

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these … competence of the Bar Council of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these Rules are unreasonable and arbitrary and hence violative … or any other authority would remain a moot question in the absence of bringing into force Section 30. Section 32 deals with the 'power of Court to permit appearances in particular cases by persons not enrolled as advocates'.

Bhiwa Yeshwant Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR361; 1978MhLJ589

conditions as the Court may deem just and proper. This position is also, to an extent, supported by section 32 of the Advocates, Act 1961, vide :'Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter, any Court, authority or person may … view prima facie that this is a fit case for action against Mr. J.R. Pandey under the Advocates Act, 1961, section 45 of which runs as follows :'Any person who practises in any Court or before any authority or … the board in that behalf showing Mr. J.R. Pandey as being the Advocate for the appellant.3. When the matter was first called out on April

K. Umeshwar Vs. Electronics Corporation of India, Hyd. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 33; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD184; 2000(3)ALT791

concerned, are governed by Sections 32 and 33 of the Advocates Act. It is held that:'Now, the Advocates Act, 1961, which is an Act to amend and consolidate the law. repeals the above provisions of the Letters Patent … consolidate the law. repeals the above provisions of the Letters Patent and parts of the Legal Practitioners Act. Section 32 of the Advocates Act uses the word 'appear' while Seclions 29 and 32 use the expression 'practise'. The … and offered to provide legal aid to the petitioner by engaging an advocate to argue the case on his behalf. The petitioner as well as

Kuriachan Chacko and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government Home (C) D ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Special Public Prosecutor since under the Rules framed by the Bar Council of India under the Advocates Act, 1961, a Senior Advocate is prohibited from acting on behalf of a client/party directly. Designation of the 4th respondent … before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam as C.C. No.850 of 2011. Petitioners have been charged under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 along with Section … or misuse by the Executive by resort to the provisions of S. 321, Criminal Procedure Code. .. 21. Special Public Prosecutor is not a mouthpiece

Hari Om Rajender Kumar and Others Vs. Chief Rationing Officer of Civil ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 119 and 122 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 4, Rules 5 and 32; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 24, 24-A, 29, 30, 32, 32A, 33 and 45; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 2, 3, IV, 6-C(II) and VII; Untouchability (Offences) Act; Bar Councils Act - Sections 8 and 49(1); Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 10; Solicitors Act, 1860 - Sections 26; Supreme Court Rules - Order 12, Rule 9; Solicitors Act, 1843 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1990AP340

Civil Rules of Practice. It was, however, pointed out to the G.P.A. that S. 32 of the Advocates Act, 1961 requires permission to be sought by any person other than the party or the advocate for appearing and … consolidate the law, repeals the above provisions of the Letters Patent and parts of the Legal Practitioners Act. Section 32 of the Advocates Act uses the word 'appear' while Sees. 29 and 33 use the expression 'Practice'. The