Advanced Search Results

Amarjit Singh Kalra (Through Lrs) and ors. Vs. Smt. Pramod Gupta (Thro ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 3 to 16, 15 to 20; Indian Bar Council Rules - Rule 15; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 49(1), 50 and 58A; Land Acquisition Act, 1896 - Sections 4 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Punjab Land Revenue Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 7; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Delhi High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4, 11 and 15; High Courts (Punjab) Order, 1947 - Orders 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 145

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi41; 99(2004)DLT115; 2004(77)DRJ686

under Section 15 of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 deemed to have been adopted under the Advocates Act, 1961. It is contended in the application that the appeal arises out of the judgment and decree made by … B.C. Patel, C.J.1. This matter is concerned with rights of audience of an advocate in the Court. Such a right being in general is governed in this country by practice as well … Singla, Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 20.5.1980 in reference proceedings under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1896. The Land Acquisition Collector acquired lands

Chhabil Dass Vs. Inder Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Council of Punjab (Constitution and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1963 - Rules 32, 34, 35(1), 35(2) and 38; ;Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana Election Rules, 1968 - Rule 34 and 34(4); ;Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh Rule, 1972 - Rule 34(4); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 8; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1976HP6

Himachal Pradesh became a State on and from January 25, 1971. Section 24 of the Act amended the Advocates Act, 1961, thereby providing for a Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh. The first Bar Council was constituted shortly … Pradesh became a State on and from January 25, 1971. Section 24 of the Act amended the Advocates Act, 1961, thereby providing for a Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh. The first Bar Council was constituted shortly thereafter, and … First Meeting: Within 15 days from the election becoming final under Rule 31 the Advocate General shall convene a meeting of the Bar Council after

Democratic Bar Association, Allahabad and Others Vs. High Court of Jud ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 16(1), (2) and (3), 17(1), (2) and (3), 17 to 27, 28, 34, 34(1) and 49; Designation of Senior Advocates Rules, 1999 - Rules 1, 2, 3, 3(A) and (B), 5, 9 and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 216, 217(2), 226, 233(2) and 235; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 237; Company Law Board (Procedure) Rules, 1964

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2383A; (2000)2UPLBEC1387

impugned Rules has no substance. This Court framed Rules under Section 34(1) read with Section 16(2) of the Advocate Act, 1961 on 28.2.1992 which were published in U.P. Gazette dated 9.5.1992. The authority of this Court to make Rules … of the present case.12. Similarly, in Rajnit Prasad v. Union of India and others, JT 2000 (2) SC 31 Hon'ble Supreme Court rejected the special leave petition challenging the Judgment of Patna High Court saying that petitioner

Ravindra K vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 27.03.2023 IN WP No.12567/2020 (S-RES). IN … DIVISION KPTCL, HOOTAGALLI MYSURU - 570 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHIRISH KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; Ms. M.L. SUVARNA FOR SRI K.PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 & R5) - THIS WRIT … CESC MADIKERI5. SHASHI KUMAR H.S. RT DIVISION, KPTCL MANDYA6. SOMASHEKARA M.K. PURCHASE SECTION CORPORATE OFFICE CESC. No.29 VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE HINKAL MYSURU 570 0177. SUNIL … FTS COMPUND N. R. MOHALLA MYSURU - 570 007 (NOW RETIRED ON 31.03.2023)3. NAGESH S. TAQC, CORPORATE OFFICE CESC.No.29 VIJAYANAGARA, 2ND STAGE HINKAL MYSURU -

Prem Nath, Advocate Vs. Kapildeo Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 38

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC717

M.M. Punchhi and; K. Jayachandra Reddy, JJ.1. This is a statutory appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 against the order dated 20-5-1990 of the Bar Council of India whereby the appellant was debarred … M.M. Punchhi and; K. Jayachandra Reddy, JJ.1. This is a statutory appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 against the order dated 20-5-1990 of the Bar Council of India whereby the appellant was debarred from practising … copy of the judgment. The judgment was received by the appellant on 31-8-1990 as mentioned by learned counsel for the appellant as also stated in

Sardar Harvinder Singh Sehgal and ors. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of I ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 116, 119(2), 147, 148, 151(1), 151(2) and 292B; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987

to tax for the assessmentyear 1984-85 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. I, therefore, propose to assess the income for the said assessment year and I hereby require you to … entitled to the prize money equally. The draw was held on October 31, 1983, and the ticket won the first prize of rupees one crore. … other four persons as the petitioners feign ignorance about them. 10. Heard Shri J. P. Bhattacharjee, the learned advocate for the petitioners, and Dr. A. K. Saraf, the learned advocate for the Revenue. Affidavit-in-opposition has been filed

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sohanlal Jajodia

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 12(1B); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(22) and 147

Reported in : [1987]164ITR626(Cal)

accumulated profits of Rs. 12,26,206, the latter amount became a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and became assessable in the hands of the firm as deemed dividend. It was recorded that the said … company. In the balance-sheet of the private limited company as on March 31, 1947, the said amount of Rs. 80 lakhs was shown ' as … a curable error which should have been overlooked by the Tribunal ' 9. At the hearing, the learned advocate appearing for the Revenue drew our attention to the following sections of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and

Additional Cit Vs. Kavita Construction (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)73TTJ(NULL)701

as per the provisions of the Companies Act, as well as under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessing officer has not pointed out any defects in the books of account nor he has found … be set aside and that of the assessing officer should be restored.9. Shri N.M. Ranka, the learned senior advocate who represented the assessee before us pointed out that the appellant has maintained proper books of account which … The income was assessed by the assessing officer vide assessment order dated 31-3-1999, on total income of Rs. 57,13,713. The following disallowance were made by

The Chairman Bar Council of Tamil Nadu High Court and the Chairman Tru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(5), 16, 16(1) and 22; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 2, 5, 57 and 100; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 6, 7(2), 17, 24 and 26A; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926; Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 2000; Orissa Administrative Service Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Article 14; UCO Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulation 22

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ107

practice as an Advocate, he must enroll with the Bar Council as per Section 17 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (Act No. 25 of 1961). Under the Advocates Act, 1961, which was enacted with the main feature of … should not insist in such cases on what Holmes, J. called 'delusive exactness' (Truax v. Corrigan 1921-257 U.S. 312 supra). All that the court is expected to see, in dealing with equal protection claims, is whether the

Vikrant Tyres Limited Now Known as J.K. Industries Limited Through Its ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 21, 21(1) and 21(2); Companies Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4 and 25; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act 1972 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006]148STC122(All)

is not circumscribed by a rider like the one that exists in Section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, namely that the Income Tax Officer has reason to believe that by reason of the omission or failure … of 'agricultural implement' in the relevant Notification; particularly Gazette Notification dated January 31, 1985 and Gazette Notification dated 30-6-1986 (Annexures-3 and 4 to the W.P. … power and unsettle things for ever without an acceptable excuse.11. Learned counsel for the Respondents, Sri K.M. Sahai, Advocate, on the other hand, submitted that Section 21(2) of the Act clearly lays down that when matter is