Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 29 · Page 1 of about 5,574 results (0.246 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 1997

Abhay Prakash Sahay Lalan Vs. High Court of Judicature at Patna Throug ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-28-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 33, 34 and 34(1); Patna High Court Rules - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 145

and the Courts subordinate thereto. Chapter IV of the Advocates Act, 1961 deals with the right to practise. Section 29 declares that as from the appointed day, there shall be only one class of persons entitled to practise … appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the High Court to make rules under Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961, laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate may be permitted to practise in the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1975

Jamilabai Abdul Kadar Vs. Shankarlal Gulabchand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-1975

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(15) - Order 3, Rules 1 and 4

Reported in : AIR1975SC2202; 1976MhLJ1(SC); (1975)2SCC609; [1975]SuppSCR336

the rule of law in society.8. National integration at the lawyer's level was statutorily achieved by the Advocates Act, 1961 whereby the Indian Bar, with a classless orientation, came into existence permitting enrolment of various categories of legal … classless orientation, came into existence permitting enrolment of various categories of legal practioners like vakils and pleaders (see Section 29). It must be noted, however, that Shri Palshikar has not been enrolled as an Advocate. On the contrary,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2012

Sunanda Bhimrao Chaware and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2012

Subject : Education

234, Article 309 – Advocates Act, 1961 – Section 24, Section 24(1),(a),(b),(c),(e), Section 28, Section 28(1), Section 28(2)(d), Section 29, Section 30, Section 33, Section 49, Section 49(1)(ah) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 24 and … Satya Narain vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225)to mean judicial service. The Advocates Act, 1961: 8. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for persons who may be admitted as advocates on … - (a) a holder of Degree in Law (b) practising as an Advocate in the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto for not less than

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 18 1975

Chhabil Dass Vs. Inder Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1975

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Council of Punjab (Constitution and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1963 - Rules 32, 34, 35(1), 35(2) and 38; ;Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana Election Rules, 1968 - Rule 34 and 34(4); ;Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh Rule, 1972 - Rule 34(4); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 8; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1976HP6

Himachal Pradesh became a State on and from January 25, 1971. Section 24 of the Act amended the Advocates Act, 1961, thereby providing for a Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh. The first Bar Council was constituted shortly … Pradesh became a State on and from January 25, 1971. Section 24 of the Act amended the Advocates Act, 1961, thereby providing for a Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh. The first Bar Council was constituted shortly thereafter, and … of publication in the Punjab Government Gazette of the list under Rule 29.(3) The Secretary shall, on receipt of my such letter, refer the dispute,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1976

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. I.M. Patel and Co.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 12(5), 25(1), 44AA, 133, 139(1), 139(2), 139A, 142(1), 143(2), 148, 167(8), 270, 271, 271(1), 271A, 272A(2), 272B, 273, 275A, 276, 276A, 276B, 276C, 276D, 276CC, 280, 285, 285B and 286

Reported in : [1977]107ITR214(Guj)

Cowan & Sons Ltd. [1968] AC 107 (HL) the House of Lords was concerned with the interpretation of section 29, sub-section (1) of the Factories Act, 1961 which provide : 'There shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, … order of reference makes it clear that it was in the context of section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that this question arose before the Division Bench and, therefore, in order to answer correctly the question that … used are 'without reasonable cause or excuse' and 'wilfully.' 7. The learned Advocate-General appearing on behalf of the assessee has contended that in the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1979

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel a ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-25-1979

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 131, 132(5), 147, 148, 148(2), 269, 269A, 269A(1), 269C, 269C(1), 269C(2), 269D, 269D(1), 269D(2), 269E, 269E(3), 269F, 269F(6), 269G, 269H, 269-I, 269J, 269J(4), 269P, 269P(1), 269S, 271, 271(1) and 279A; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18

Reported in : (1979)GLR413; (1979)0GLR413; [1979]118ITR134(Guj)

B.K. Mehta, J.1. These two appeals under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-II, Ahmedabad, are directed against the common order of the … refer to at the appropriate stage. 16. The above contentions were sought to be repelled by the learned advocate for the respondent-transferees by urging that the competent authority lacked the initial jurisdiction to initiate proceedings because there … 3. The IAC, Acquisition Range-II, Ahmedabad, therefore, decided to issue notice under section 269D(1) initiating proceeding for acquisition of the two sheds in question in … respondent-transferee of each of these appeals has paid a consideration of Rs. 29,521 to the transferor, M/s. Sigil (India) Services Pvt. Ltd., which had its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1996

Advocates' Association Vs. Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-17-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A and 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32 to 35 and 49(1)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR221

the Constitution of India. Learned Senior Counsel also took me through some of the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), and also the rules framed thereunder in support of his submissions.8. Secondly, … framed by the Bar Council of India in exercise of the power conferred on it under the Act.12. Section 29 of the Act provides that subject to provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder, only Advocates … ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. This petition is presented by the Advocates Association, Bangalore, which is a premier association of Advocates in Karnataka State,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1992

Panineeya Law College, Represented by Its President D.N. Sastry and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-29-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Institutions of Law (Regulation of Admissions into Courses in Law through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1989 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 8; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1) and 15; Bar Council of India Rules, 1982; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1) and 49(1); University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 12A; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 245, 246 and 254; Universities Grants Commission (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT389

We summarise and formulate them as under:(i) Provisions of Section 7(1)(h) and Section 49(1)(af) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, enacted by the Parliament under Entries 77 and 78 of List I of Seventh Schedule of … summarise and formulate them as under:(i) Provisions of Section 7(1)(h) and Section 49(1)(af) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, enacted by the Parliament under Entries 77 and 78 of List I of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution … order, interim directions given in other writ petitions were also vacated on 29th April, 1992. Thus, it could be seen that the candidates who have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2011

Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Vs. the State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 3(2), 29, 30 and 32, 34(1), 49; Indian Penal Cod - Section 323, 504, 342, 353; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 97, 313, 135, 41(d); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - section 15, 2(c)(iii); Constitution of India - Article 145

1. Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, a Statutory body constituted under the provisions of Advocates Act, 1961 filed present contempt petition on 10th July, 2003 against respondent nos.2 and 3. The petitioner contends that respondent … in matter which cannot be gone into proceedings of this nature. Learned counsel referred to the provisions of section 29, 30 and 32 of the Advocates Act. 15. The provisions of section 29, 30 and 32 of the … right of appearance in courts is still within the control and jurisdiction of courts. Section 30 of the Advocate Act has not been brought into force and rightly so. Control of conduct in court can only be within

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2004

Bar Council of India Vs. High Court of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2004

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 19, 30, 34, 34(1), 35, 35(1), 36 and 49; Kerala Advocates Rules - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 129, 142, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180 and 228

Reported in : AIR2004SC2227; 2004(3)ALD115(SC); 2004(3)ALT53(SC); [2004(3)JCR97(SC)]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC428; 2004(2)KLT485(SC); 2004(5)SCALE232; (2004)6SCC311; 2004(2)LC1243(SC)

in this writ petition.BACKGROUND FACT:2. The Bar Council of India is a statutory body constituted under the Advocates Act, 1961 ('the Act'). In terms of Section 34(1) of the Act, the High Court of Kerala framed rules; Rule … v. Union of India and Anr. : [1998]2SCR795 , that as in terms of the provisions of the Advocate Act, the Bar Council of India is entitled to punish an Advocate counsel for commission of misconduct - whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial