Advanced Search Results

Sunanda Bhimrao Chaware and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Satya Narain vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225)to mean judicial service. The Advocates Act, 1961: 8. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for persons who may be admitted as advocates on … conditions subject to which a person is qualified to be admitted as an Advocate on a state roll. Section 28(1) confers power on the State Bar Council to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Chapter.

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these … competence of the Bar Council of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these Rules are unreasonable and arbitrary and hence violative … condition for enrolment nor its absence to be treated as a disqualification for enrolment. Next relevant Section is Section 28, which deals with 'powers of the State Bar Council to make Rules to carry out the purposes of

Belapur Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Farming Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 to 98; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom231; 1970MhLJ330

of sugarcane that the plaintiffs were cultivating the said lands. Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961, however, all surplus lands of the plaintiffs, i.e. lands in excess of the ceiling fixed in the manner … by the Act, vested in the State Government, subject, of course, to payment of compensation as therein provided. Section 28 of the said Act which is important for the purpose of this case and which must, therefore, be … paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by the learned Advocate General that the same has been denied in paragraph 27 of the

Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and Another Vs. the Secretary, Bar Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 49(1)(ah) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India framed Rule 49 under which there is a prohibition on an Advocate being … the State who is entitled to be enrolled under the rules of the State Bar Council made under Section 28(2)(d) read with Section 24(1)(e) despite being a full time salaried employee. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa

Dr. Haniraj L. Chulani Vs. Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 16 to 28, 30, 33, 35, 36, 37, 42 and 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21; Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955; Bar Council of India Rules

Reported in : AIR1996SC1708; 1996(2)ALT31(SC); JT1996(4)SC162; (1996)3SCC342

of Maharashtra & Goa was justified in refusing enrolment of the appellant as an advocate under the Advocates Act, 1961 as he is a medical practitioner who does not want to give up his medical practice but wants … on its roll except with the previous consent of the former and of the Bar Council of India. Section 28 confers power on a State Bar Council to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Chapter

Mohanlal Ganpatram Vs. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. L ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 31, 172, 173, 210, 287, 293, 299, 300, 314, 330, 356, 397, 398, 400, 402, 406, 407, 539 and 543

Reported in : (1964)0GLR804

profit, during all the rest of the years from 1949 up to 1961 the company consistently made losses. The carried forward loss at the close … Prahladji Rawal and Rameshchandra Bakubhai thereafter carried on negotiations as offer in writing was made by S.M. Jhunjhunwala, advocate on behalf of Bharat Kala Bhandar Limited, to Messrs. Kanga and Company, solicitors on behalf of the company, … on the Bench I have come across very few petitions under section 397 or 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, which have been brought to a conclusion. The remedy under section 397 or 398 as a weapon … Shah Manilal Mulchand agreed to give time to the company up to 28th March, 1959. The plant and machinery which constituted the rest of the

Lal Chand Saini, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (2008)149PLR606

that requires adjudication, is the legality of Rule 2-B of Rule 28(2)(d) read with Section 24(1)(e) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short herein after referred to as 'the Act'). The said amendment debars a person, otherwise … requires adjudication, is the legality of Rule 2-B of Rule 28(2)(d) read with Section 24(1)(e) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short herein after referred to as 'the Act'). The said amendment debars a person, otherwise qualified to

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

in parenthesis added by the Finance Act, 1985 introducing the following change in Section 136 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. April 1,1974 from which the CrPC, 1973 came into force. Section 28 of the Finance Act amended … Main High Court Building, Bombay 400032, when you are required to appear either in person or by an Advocate to show cause, if any, why proceedings should not be initiated against you as hitherto fore stated for

Vithaldas H. Dhanjibhai Bardanwala Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 155 and 155(6)

Reported in : (1981)21CTR(Guj)190; [1981]130ITR95(Guj)

were not written off as required by law as per the provisions of section 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?' 2. In order to appreciate the nature of the controversy posed for our consideration in the present … shall be allowed in respect of the matters dealt with therein in computing the income referred to in section 28'. Clause (vii) of s. 36(1) states that subject to the provisions of sub-s. (2), the amount of any … same to us, as we have already stated above. 8. The learned Advocate-General appearing for the assessee contended that the Tribunal was apparently in error

Satish Kumar Sharma Vs. the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24(1), 28(2) and 35; Advocates (Right To Take Up Law Teaching) Rules, 1979 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 233(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC509; (2001)3GLR1867; JT2001(1)SC236; (2001)1MLJ166(SC); 2001(1)SCALE23; [2001]1SCR34; 2001(1)LC424(SC); (2001)1UPLBEC601

the enrolment was validly granted to him as he fulfilled the requirements of relevant provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961; he also pointed out that advocates, who obtained enrolment and later on joined State Government service in the … an express bar created by Rules, made by any State Bar Council in exercise of its powers under Section 28(2)(d) read with Section 24(1)(e) of the Advocates Act, 1961; since the respondent has not framed any rules expressly … by its order dated 6.9.1983 allowed the appellant to act as an advocate of the Board and also ordered that the expenditure of his getting