Advanced Search Results

Belapur Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Farming Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 to 98; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom231; 1970MhLJ330

paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by the learned Advocate General that the same has been denied in paragraph 27 of the … of sugarcane that the plaintiffs were cultivating the said lands. Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961, however, all surplus lands of the plaintiffs, i.e. lands in excess of the ceiling fixed in the manner … the production and supply of raw material from the land to the undertaking. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 27, but subject to any rules made in this behalf, for the purpose of so ensuring the continuance of

Competition Commission of India and Anr vs.oriental Rubber Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the strength of this decision, he contended that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 was not an unqualified right and it may be restricted “by law for the time being in force.” … procedure required to be followed by the DG as a prelude to the passing of an order under Section 27 of the Act is akin to the provisions to be followed in a civil court in deciding a … COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.…. Appellants Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Balaji Subramanian, Sh. Udayan Verma and Sh. Siddharth Nath, Advocates.

Park View Enterprises Vs. State Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Stamp and the Registration (T.N. Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 2(4); Indian Stamp Act, 1899; Indian Registration Act, 1908; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 226, 300-A and 301

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas723(Mad)

K. Kutty Naha : [1969]1SCR645 , wherein it was pointed out that, in enacting the Kerala Buildings Tax Act, 1961, no attempt at any rational classification was made by the Legislature because, in imposing the tax, the nature … is sought to be sold without reference to the building, the authorities concerned are entitled to proceed under section 27 read with section 47A and section 64, etc., of the Stamp Act by applying section 8 of the … or share of the land as described in the document. 45. Learned Advocate-General, in countering these points, would first submit that a legislative enactment could

Hiraman Ratan Baisane Vs. Election Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101, 102 and 114; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 27(2) and 27(5); Zilla Parishads Election Rules - Rule 64(2) and 64(6)

Reported in : 2006(6)MhLj324

the submissions made by the rival parties.26. Under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 ('Act' for short), the District Judge is empowered to enquire and determine the validity of the elections held … bear their own costs.12. Challenging the aforesaid order, the present Petition is filed.13. Mr. P.M. Shah learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the allegations of the respondent No. 3 that initially the

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel a ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 131, 132(5), 147, 148, 148(2), 269, 269A, 269A(1), 269C, 269C(1), 269C(2), 269D, 269D(1), 269D(2), 269E, 269E(3), 269F, 269F(6), 269G, 269H, 269-I, 269J, 269J(4), 269P, 269P(1), 269S, 271, 271(1) and 279A; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18

Reported in : (1979)GLR413; (1979)0GLR413; [1979]118ITR134(Guj)

B.K. Mehta, J.1. These two appeals under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-II, Ahmedabad, are directed against the common order of the … acquisition of the two sheds in question in his order of June 27, 1973, for the reasons recorded by him in the said order. Accordingly, … refer to at the appropriate stage. 16. The above contentions were sought to be repelled by the learned advocate for the respondent-transferees by urging that the competent authority lacked the initial jurisdiction to initiate proceedings because there … 3. The IAC, Acquisition Range-II, Ahmedabad, therefore, decided to issue notice under section 269D(1) initiating proceeding for acquisition of the two sheds in question in

M. Veerabhadraiah and Another Vs. The Union of India, By Its Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ann-A and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of … and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying … by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as "the Act"). … thereafter, was also dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 27/11/2013. It is contended that the grounds urged in that writ petition are

iqbalnath Premnath Anand Vs. Rameshwarnath Premnath Anand and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1976Bom405; 1977MhLJ51

Court in Karumuthu Thiagarajan Chettiar's case, where at page 1230 of AIR 1961, the Supreme Court, said that the essence of a partnership by giving … at Jullundur is still going on.6. As a result of these disputes and differences, the plaintiff by his advocate's letter dated the 19th June, 1973, gave a notice to the two defendants as the other partners of … right in law to do so by a notice of dissolution under Section 43 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is clear from paragraph 2 of the letter dated the 19th

Dipakbhai Mohanbhai Patel Vs. A.S. Patel or His Successor in the Offic ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 7, 8(4), 22, 30(1), 55, 55(1), 55(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(3), 61, 99, 104, 104(1), 114(2), 104(4), 104(5), 105(2), 178(1), 178(1A), 297, 252, 252(1), 252(2), 253, 253(1), 253(4), 267 and 271(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Sections 49, 297, 303A and 317; Indian Penal Code; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 310; Gujarat Panchayat Elections Rules, 1994 - Rule 9(2); Gujarat Panchayats (Procedure) Rules, 1997 - Rule 55; Gujarat Revenue Rules - Rule 101; Gujarat Gram and Nagar Panchayat Taxes and Fees Rules, 1984

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2167

Judge of this Court, prima facie, support the petitioner's contention. These decisions were rendered under the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 which conferred similar powers of removal on the D.D.O. under Section 49, and power of dissolution/supersession of the … plot holders. I had called for original records and perused the same and permitted access thereto to the Advocates appearing for the petitioners to examine the contentions of the petitioners that the resolutions were later on interpolated … nominations : 13-1-2009Date of polling, if necessary : 25-1-2009Date of counting : 27-1-2009In view of the above election program, the elections were conducted and the

S.Diwakar. Vs. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Articles 226

respondents 2 and 3 lodged a complaint with the first respondent-Bar Council under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Bar Council sent a copy of the complaint to the petitioner and the petitioner submitted a reply … on her behalf and on behalf of the third respondent, who is her son.3. The petitioner is an Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu. He is practising in various Courts in the City and … the complaint to the petitioner and the petitioner submitted a reply on 27.7.2011. The notice as well as the reply were placed before the Bar

H.H. Shri Natwarsinghji Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7 and 27(3)

Reported in : (1992)108CTR(Guj)386; [1993]201ITR133(Guj)

books of account as was required to be done under the provisions of section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Learned counsel, Mr. B. J. Shelat, appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand, strongly contended that there … assesse ?' 3. It was urged on behalf of the assessee by Mr. K. H. Kaji, the learned advocate appearing for the assessee, that there was ample material on record which clearly suggested that the debt in … the following common question for the opinion of this court under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') :