Advanced Search Results

Joginder Singh Vs. the Bar Council of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 26(1) and 26(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 20(2);

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi192; 1975RLR15

practiced at Shaharanpur. He then applied to the Bar Council of India under section 18 of the Advocates Act 1961 for the transfer of his name from the roll of the U.P. Bar Council to that of the … T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) The appellant, Joginder Singh, was once an advocate. His grievance is that his name has been struck off the rolls. … appears to this Council that this concealment constitutes misrepresentation and fraud within the meaning of the proviso to Section 26(1) of the said Act, and whereas your name is liable to be removed from the roll of advocates

Noratanmal Chouraria Vs. M.R. Murli and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 38; ;Bar Council of India Rules; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307

Reported in : AIR2004SC2440; 2004(3)AWC2167(SC); [2004(3)JCR168(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC552; RLW2004(2)SC284; 2004(4)SCALE755; (2004)5SCC689; (2004)3UPLBEC2428

respondent herein is in question in this appeal preferred by the Appellant herein under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.BACKGROUND FACTS:2. The relationship between the appellant and the respondents herein is that of landlords and tenant. … herein is in question in this appeal preferred by the Appellant herein under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.BACKGROUND FACTS:2. The relationship between the appellant and the respondents herein is that of landlords and tenant. A rent … behind and hit him on his back and ran away. (2) On 26.10.1993 while the appellant was coming out of the court hall, the first

Prayag Chand Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 23, 26, 26(2) and 54; Rajasthan Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 - Sections 20, 46 and 47 - Schedule - Articles 1, 2 and 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(14), 26(2), 47, 104, 144 and 476 - Order 43; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 ; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 8 - Schedule - Article 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 26; Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 11 - Schedule - Articles 3 and 10; Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 51; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 11; Madhya Pradesh Court-fees Act - Sections 8

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1234; 2005(3)WLC143

mention the valuation of the appeal and submitted that Section 46 of Rajasthan Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1961') would not govern the question of requirement of payment of … with Entry-I of Schedule-I annexed with the Act 1961.13. Learned Additional Advocate General has invited our attention to Section 26 of the Land Acquisition Act which declares the award made by the District Judge in a reference proceedings

Bar Council of Gujarat Vs. Vinod Harjivandas Dixit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10-B, 14, 29 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 2 and 10; Gujarat Bar Council (Constitution and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11, 15(1), 28 and 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 233(2), 243-O and 243-ZB; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)A and 14; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 31;

Reported in : AIR2001Guj132; (2001)3GLR2280

shall be deemed to be vacated his office with effect from 22-7-2000 under Section 10B of the Advocates Act, 1961. The respondent challenged the process undertaken for the purpose of filling up the vacancy, by the letter of … State Bar Council that he had ceased to practise law and that he was not practising as an Advocate in any Court of India, forwarding his declaration and the original sanad to the Bar Council along with … vacancy, by the letter of the Secretary of the Bar Council dated 26-7-2000 written to all the members of the Bar Council pursuant to the

Uttar Bhartiya Nagar Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. the ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950

Reported in : (2001)GLR303

for which this Cooperative housing Society has been constituted and registered under the provisions of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, but as a result of his acting in the aforesaid manner, it is resulting in manifold litigations before … of doing it voluntarily, even after the orders have been passed under Section 75 and 83 of the Act, 1961, has instead of delivering possession … may be a good ground for dismissal of the special civil application. 26. The jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of … that the record of the Society was with him. This order has been passed in presence of the advocate of the petitioner and in case the record of the Society would not have been with the petitioner,

Bangalore Wood Industries Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ( ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(3), 6, 8 and 15B; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5A

Reported in : [1994]92STC603(Kar)

of time of its enactment cannot be ignored. The Finance Act, 1964, amended section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; this was understood in a particular manner by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, in a circular issued … the former is not consumed 'in the manufacture of any new article' The attempt of the learned Government Advocate to persuade us to accept the Revenue's stand did not stop here. The learned counsel tried to distinguish … advanced in Titaghur Paper Mills case : [1985]3SCR26 is referred at page 261 of STC (1326 of AIR) thus : '..... According to the respondent-firm,

Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals (Travancore) Private Ltd., Trivandrum an ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 19 and 21; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rules 16, 33, 51 and 141; Travancore Abkari Act, 1073 - Sections 15, 26 and 29

Reported in : AIR1965Ker135

then refers to representations made under Ex. P 2 dated 31st March 1961 disputing his liability to pay the amounts specified in Ex. P 1 … 4 of Ex. P1 is on the basis of Rule 51 of the Rules dated 21-10-1950 issued under Section 26 of the Travancore Abkari Act, Act 4 of 1073, as well as Section 29 of the Cochin Abkari … the companies concerned.2. Mr. K.K. Menon, learned counsel appearing for all these petitions, as well as the learned Advocate General appearing for the State, the respondent in all these matters, have agreed to treat the pleadings in

Diamond Jubilee Bank Bachav Samiti Vs. State of Gujarat and 6 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 6, 13A, 13A(2), 13C, 13D, 15, 15A, 16, 16(1), 16(3), 17, 17(1), 17(2), 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(2), 22, 23, 23(1), 26, 26(1), 27 and 43; Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961; General Insurance Act; Deposit Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006Guj194

to discharge its statutory obligation as provided under the provisions of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. Respondent No. 4 i.e. Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation [hereinafter referred … the Corporation in respect of that deposit.Chapter IV includes topics regarding funds, accounts and audit of the Corporation. Section 26 makes a provision for advance by Reserve Bank of India to the Corporation on its request.6. Having seen … It is, therefore, submitted at the hearing by Mr. Shalin Mehta, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that even at the interim stage of the

Dipakbhai Mohanbhai Patel Vs. A.S. Patel or His Successor in the Offic ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 7, 8(4), 22, 30(1), 55, 55(1), 55(2), 56, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(3), 61, 99, 104, 104(1), 114(2), 104(4), 104(5), 105(2), 178(1), 178(1A), 297, 252, 252(1), 252(2), 253, 253(1), 253(4), 267 and 271(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Sections 49, 297, 303A and 317; Indian Penal Code; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 310; Gujarat Panchayat Elections Rules, 1994 - Rule 9(2); Gujarat Panchayats (Procedure) Rules, 1997 - Rule 55; Gujarat Revenue Rules - Rule 101; Gujarat Gram and Nagar Panchayat Taxes and Fees Rules, 1984

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2167

Judge of this Court, prima facie, support the petitioner's contention. These decisions were rendered under the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 which conferred similar powers of removal on the D.D.O. under Section 49, and power of dissolution/supersession of the … plot holders. I had called for original records and perused the same and permitted access thereto to the Advocates appearing for the petitioners to examine the contentions of the petitioners that the resolutions were later on interpolated … Additional Development Commissioner by a statutory delegation order contained in Notification dated 26-7-1994 as amended from time to time. The Additional Development Commissioner heard the

Sri. Paras Jain Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the matter, I deem it appropriate to consider the same at the outset. Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 deals with punishment of advocates for misconduct and reads as follows: “35. Punishment of advocates for misconduct.―(1) Where … 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.20076 OF2023(GM - RES) BETWEEN: SRI PARAS JAIN ADVOCATE S/O LATE SRI. P.BHAWARLAL DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT71YEARS R/AT38 5TH CROSS GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. ... PETITIONER (BY … pursuant to which, the decree holders received possession of the property on 26-11-2021 through the Court Commissioner appointed by the Executing Court.3. The 2nd respondent