Advanced Search Results

M. Radhakrishnan Vs. the Secretary, the Bar Council of India and the S ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 24, 24A, 28, 28(2), 49 and 49(1); Indian Bar Council Act, 1926; Welfare scheme Act; Tamil Nadu Bar Council Enrolment Rules - Rules 8A, 6(4) and 6(2); Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1) and 21

Reported in : AIR2007Mad108; 2006(5)CTC705

in person; Mr. B. Balaji and Mr. K. Venkatakrishan, learned Counsels for R-1 and R-2 respectively.5. The Advocates Act, 1961, provides for an autonomous Bar Council in each State and an All India Bar Council consisting mainly of … P. Sathasivam, J.1. Thiru. M. Radhakrishnan, who is a practising Advocate, has filed the above Public Interest Litigation, for the issuance of a writ of declaration to declare Rule … was quashed by the Supreme Court only on the ground that under Section 28(2)(d) of the Advocates Act, only State Bar Councils can prescribe conditions … interest of administration of justice. The first respondent-Bar Council of India, on 25.09.1993, framed Rule-9 in Chapter III of Part VI of the Bar Council

Akhilesh Kumar Misra, and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at A ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26A, 29, 30, 33 and 49 to 54; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rules 44 and 57A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(9) and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1995All148; [1995(71)FLR92]; (1995)1UPLBEC374

means an advocate entered in any roll under the provision of this Act.'9. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides that subject to the provisions contained in the said Act and the rules made thereunder, a person … Sections 24 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code. For the purposes of this case provisions contained in Section 25 alone may be relevant which are quoted below:--'25. Assistant Public Prosecutors. -- (1) The State Government shall appoint

G. Ramachar and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka, Rep. By Its Chief S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

issue survey sketch or land survey map as per prescribed Form-11-E); 4) Sec. 81-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (to declare in the prescribed format by the purchaser as they are agriculturists and having no excess land … under section 21; (d) regulating the amount of fines imposed under sections 25 and 34, respectively; (e) regulating the exercise of the discretion reposed in … merit in the writ petition. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent - State and perused the material on record. They have also submitted their written arguments … as the "Amendment Act" for the sake of brevity) inter alia, incorporating Section 22A of the Act. The amendment Act No.55/1976 has received the assent

Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and Another Vs. the Secretary, Bar Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 49(1)(ah) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India framed Rule 49 under which there is a prohibition on an Advocate being … amended Rules is not manifestly arbitrary or wholly unreasonable, it cannot be considered as violative of Article 14.” 25. The rationale underlying Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules is that employment in a full

Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and Another Vs. the Secretary, Bar Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 49(1)(ah) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India framed Rule 49 under which there is a prohibition on an Advocate being … amended Rules is not manifestly arbitrary or wholly unreasonable, it cannot be considered as violative of Article 14.” 25. The rationale underlying Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules is that employment in a full

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 37, 37(1) and 37(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 131(B) and 293; ;Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(2) and 7; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 171A and 171A(4); ;Indian Oaths Act, 1873; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Section 20A; ;Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 135(2) - Order 10, Rule 2 - Order 16 - Order 18, Rule 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

petitions have been filed for mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to be accompanied by an advocate of his choice when he appears before the respondent in pursuant of the summons issued to them under … to under Sub-section (1) shall exercise like powers which are conferred on the Income-tax authorities under the Income-tax Act, 1961.Section 131 of the Income-tax Act contemplates that the officers concerned shall for the purpose of that Act, shall … by him in his communication to the respondent sent by RPAD on 25-10-2009. The advocate of the petitioner was not permitted to meet him. Though,

Fareni Vividh Karyakari Sahkari Seva Mandali Ltd. Vs. A.V. Vadher

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2001)GLR204

OF 20002. This petition is filed by a Co-operative Society - Bank registered under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 (`Act of 1961' for short) against the returning officer for election of the Managing Committee of the Bank … Rule 2(ia). Thus, society means a society specified under sub-section (1) of Section 74-C of the Act of 1961. 63 respondent Co-operative Societies are respondents … entertain and adjudicate petitions from legal propriety and practical perceptions and purpose. 25. It would be, also, interesting to note that there was some dispute … J.N. Bhatt, J.1. Rule. Service of rule is waived by the learned advocates appearing for respective various respondents. Upon request and in view of the urgency in the matter and since

Special Deputy Collector (La) Hlc Vs. Kakarla Yerrappa @ Yerri Swamy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 25, 28 and 34

Reported in : 1997(4)ALT200

Ac.17-00 out of Ac.29-59 cents as surplus land under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1961. He further admitted that as he succeeded in the appeal he was put back in possession of the … no power to reduce the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer in view of the provisions of Section 25 of the Act, we consider it unnecessary to go into the question whether the determination of compensation by … present case is quite the opposite. However, Sri N. Subba Reddy, Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent/cross-objector tried to justify the view taken by the

Jaldacca Tea Plantations Private Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the year 1985-86, under Section 24(3) of the Act. Since there was no assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961, applicant No. 1 could not file a certified copy of the order of assessment under the Income-tax Act, … of 50 per cent. of the tax. On August 11, 1992, an advocate's letter was sent to respondent No. 3, demanding justice and expressing willingness … Income-tax Act, respondent No. 4 made an assessment to agricultural income-tax to the best of his judgment under Section 25(5) of the Act at Rs. 1,72,524, after setting off losses for the years 1982-83 and 1983-84.In that order

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. I.M. Patel and Co.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 12(5), 25(1), 44AA, 133, 139(1), 139(2), 139A, 142(1), 143(2), 148, 167(8), 270, 271, 271(1), 271A, 272A(2), 272B, 273, 275A, 276, 276A, 276B, 276C, 276D, 276CC, 280, 285, 285B and 286

Reported in : [1977]107ITR214(Guj)

order of reference makes it clear that it was in the context of section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that this question arose before the Division Bench and, therefore, in order to answer correctly the question that … regards offences and prosecutions, the words used are 'without reasonable cause or excuse' and 'wilfully.' 7. The learned Advocate-General appearing on behalf of the assessee has contended that in the same statute, that is, in the Income-tax … failure to register as a deale : section 9(1), read with section 25(1)(a) of the Act. But the liability to pay penalty does not arise