Advanced Search Results

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these … competence of the Bar Council of India or are ultra vires its rule making powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and in the alternative whether these Rules are unreasonable and arbitrary and hence violative … to every person whose name is entered in the roll of advocates maintained by it under this Act'. Section 23 lays down 'Right of pre-audience and the priority given to the various advocates while addressing Courts'. It lays

Sakarlal Balabhai Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 2(24), 3, 4, 4(1), 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 143(2), 147 and 148

Reported in : [1975]100ITR97(Guj)

petitioners herein by these two petitions challenge the constitutional validity of sections 22 and 23 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the legality of the notices dated 29th March, 1972, issued by respondent No. 1 herein under section … determine the rival contentions of the parties. 6. At the time of hearing of these petitions, the learned Advocate-General who appeared for the petitioners raised the following contentions : (1) Respondent No. 1 has no jurisdiction to

R.G. Devadhar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - Rule 23; ;Constitution of India - Article 14, 162, 226 and 300A; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A

Reported in : ILR1986KAR4095

respect of Writ Petitions or Writ Appeals relatable to applications under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, wherein High Court Government Pleaders have put in appearance on the direction of the High Court and not … is liable to be quashed.3. On the contrary, it is submitted on behalf of the State by Learned Advocate General that the appointment of the petitioners as High Court Government Pleaders is purely contractual; therefore, the petitioners … of office is for a period of three years. As per Rule 23(8) of the Rules, the retainer and other remuneration payable to a Law

High Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr.N.B.Deshmukh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : CONTEMPT OF THE COURT ACT, 1971 - Section 2(C); MAHARASHTRA LAND REVENUE CODE, 1966 - Sections 38, 39, 149, 156, 328, 2(11); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226, 227

The statutory right of the Advocate to practice conferred by the section 29 & 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 to uphold and duly assist in the due & proper administration of justice according to law by the … be allowed to appear in robes before the Court, the Respondent, in the first place, has relied on Section 23 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act'). The said provision authorizes the

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Assam Oil Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147

Reported in : [1982]133ITR204(Cal)

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. Under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, this reference has been made for the year 1960-61. It appears that on the 25th January, 1962, the … the 22nd November, 1965, the I TO made the reassessment under Section 23(3) read with Section 147(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961, overruling the objection … deduction in computing the income of the assessee. But during the hearing of the reference before us, learned advocate for the revenue sought to urge that the ' real information was contained in the order of the

R. Veeraragavan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 15(5), 16 and 16(1); Tamil Nadu Advocate Welfare Fund Act, 1987 - Sections 23(1); Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 2000; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2007Mad205; (2007)2MLJ824

the date of re-admission.4) Any member who is suspended by the Bar Council for misconduct under the Advocates Act 1961 (Central Act 25 of 1961) shall not be entitled to payment of any amount from the Fund under … writ of declaration declaring that the proviso to Explanation II (5) to Section 16(1) of the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 1995 as null and void being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of … filed by them before various courts. It has become mandatory under Section 23(1) of the Act to affix the Welfare Stamp on the vakalat. Government

R. Veeraragavan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to G ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 15(5), 16, 16(1), 16(1A) and 16(6); Constitution of India - Article 14; Tamil Nadu Advocate Welfare Fund Act, 1987 - Sections 23(1); Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 2000; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24

Reported in : 2007(4)KLT19

the date of re-admission.4) Any member who is suspended by the Bar Council for misconduct under the Advocates Act 1961 (Central Act 25 of 1961) shall not be entitled to payment of any amount from the Fund under … writ of declaration declaring that the proviso to Explanation II (5) to Section 16(1) of the Tamil Nadu Advocates Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 1995 as null and void being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of … filed by them before various courts. It has become mandatory under Section 23(1) of the Act to affix the Welfare Stamp on the vakalat. Government

R. Venkata Subbu and ors. Vs. the Director of Enforcement and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FERA

Reported in : (1969)1MLJ281

would be done.With reference to this case, Wade in his Administrative Law, 1961, at page 162, after stating about the Court's refusal of their aid … hands to Court, the Court would have every justification to decline redress. The other aspects are (i) whether Section 23 (1) is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution; (it) whether the intrusion of extraneous or prejudicial matter … relevant to individual instances, that would require separate treatment. For instance, in one case at least, the learned Advocate-General, appearing for the Government of India, has been fair enough to concede that the very basis of the … the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi, exercising powers under the Foreign Exchange-Regulation Act (VII of 1947), and the Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal Rules,, 1957, formulated

Union Public Ser.Commn. Vs. Gyan Prakash Srivastava

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961, - Section 22(1), 24(1); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19

Reported in : 2012(1)SCC537; 2012(1)KLT56(SN); AIR2012SCW1; 2012(1)LLN675; 2012(3)SCJ457

Allahabad University, (iii) Certificate issued by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh under Section 22(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961, (iv) Certificate dated 23.5.1986 issued by the High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, and (v) The certificates issued by … 2. After acquiring Degree in Law from Allahabad University in 1979, the respondent got himself enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. He practiced in the Allahabad High Court from September 1980 to

S.K. Kochar Vs. Nimmi Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 1 - Order 22, Rule 1 - Order 23, Rule (4); Contract Act, 1872; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 31

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)213; 68(1977)DLT914

the position. We can compare the position by reading the provisions, of Chapter XX-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 269Uc specifically refers to the agreement for sale and the said section reads as under : Section 269Uc(1)Not … damages. It is made perfectly clear by the provisions of Section 20 of the Old Act (corresponding to Section 23 of the Act of 1963) so that the Court has to determine, on the facts and circumstances of … marked as Mark D, is a notice issued by Shri N.K. Jaggi, Advocate statedtobehavinghisofficeat6, Alipur Road, Civil Lines Delhi-110054, is the notice issued to the