Advanced Search Results

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

in parenthesis added by the Finance Act, 1985 introducing the following change in Section 136 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. April 1,1974 from which the CrPC, 1973 came into force. Section 28 of the Finance Act amended … when you are required to appear either in person or by an Advocate to show cause, if any, why proceedings should not be initiated against … P. Works Ltd. Act, 1980, Section 21(6) of the Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. (Acquisition & T.O.U.) Act, 1984, Section 19(6) of the Bird & Company Ltd. (Acquisition etc.) Act, 1980, Section 12(3)(d) of the Cine Workers etc. (Regulation

Bhupati Bhusan Dalal Vs. Registrar of the Original Side

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Original Side), Rules, 1914 - Rules 1 and 22; ;Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Section 9(4), 14 and 14(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(6) and 226; ;Advocates Act - Section 50(3)

Reported in : AIR1971Cal519

ORDERD. Basu, J. 1. The Petitioner in this Rule is an Advocate enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961. In his petition filed on 16-4-1969, he challenged the validity of Rule 22 of Chap. I of the … Petitioner in this Rule is an Advocate enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961. In his petition filed on 16-4-1969, he challenged the validity of Rule … ].9. The Opposite Parties contend that the power to make rules relating to this matter is conferred by Section 34 of the Advocates Act and, under Sub-section (3) thereof, the Rules existing on 'the appointed day' under

M. Veerabhadraiah Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Bengaluru, by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as “the Act”). A direction is also sought to frame rules for designation of senior … of Pollution) Board vs. Orient Paper Mills and Another [2003 (10) SCC421 - The said case arose under Section 19 of Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The State Government under Section 19 of the said … W.P.No.35106/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P.No.36789/2014 BETWEEN: M. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT58YEARS, ADVOCATE, EN.NO.KAR/453/1986, HAVING OFFICE AT No.141, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS, 3RD

S.Kasiramalingam Vs. the Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Right to Information

contemplated under Article 217(2)(b), by quoting Section 2(1)(a) of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 and the Advocates Act, 1961, as hereunder: "Meaning of the expression an advocate of a High Court in Article 217(2)(b) 52. The said … the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Dr.Chandra Bhan Singh V. State of Rajasthan reported in AIR 1983 SC 149 was rendered without reference to the purpose and object of the Constitution of India. It is

Jhaman Karamsingh Dadlani Vs. Ramanlal Maneklal Kantawala and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 229; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957 - Rule 623; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 - Rule 1; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 6; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1975Bom182; (1974)76BOMLR644

the said Rules being violative of Articles 14 and 19 thereof as also the provisions of the Advocates Act. 1961 . A writ directing Union Government to enforce Section 30 of the said Act said Act also is … Deshpande, J. 1. The petitioner, an advocate of this Court. seeks to challenge the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957, in this petition under

Ramu S. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 22 and 24; Bar Council of India (Training) Rules, 1995 - Rule 15; Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1983

Reported in : 2002(2)KarLJ375

criterion for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division). Reliance is placed on Section 22 of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the decision of the Supreme Court in V. Sudeer v. Bar Council of India and Anr. : … ORDER1. The petitioners are all practicing Advocates. As per the Certificates of Enrolment issued to them by the Karnataka State Bar Council, the date on … Clause (3) of the Schedule to the Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1983 prescribes the minimum qualifications for the post which is extracted in clause

Bar Council of India Vs. High Court of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 19, 30, 34, 34(1), 35, 35(1), 36 and 49; Kerala Advocates Rules - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 129, 142, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180 and 228

Reported in : AIR2004SC2227; 2004(3)ALD115(SC); 2004(3)ALT53(SC); [2004(3)JCR97(SC)]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC428; 2004(2)KLT485(SC); 2004(5)SCALE232; (2004)6SCC311; 2004(2)LC1243(SC)

in this writ petition.BACKGROUND FACT:2. The Bar Council of India is a statutory body constituted under the Advocates Act, 1961 ('the Act'). In terms of Section 34(1) of the Act, the High Court of Kerala framed rules; Rule … Act. The expression 'prescribed' has been defined in Section 2(j) to mean prescribed by the rules made therein. Section 19 of the Act empowers the Bar Councils to make rolls to carry out the purposes of Chapter II. … v. Union of India and Anr. : [1998]2SCR795 , that as in terms of the provisions of the Advocate Act, the Bar Council of India is entitled to punish an Advocate counsel for commission of misconduct - whether

Sri. Paras Jain Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the matter, I deem it appropriate to consider the same at the outset. Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 deals with punishment of advocates for misconduct and reads as follows: “35. Punishment of advocates for misconduct.―(1) Where … 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.20076 OF2023(GM - RES) BETWEEN: SRI PARAS JAIN ADVOCATE S/O LATE SRI. P.BHAWARLAL DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT71YEARS R/AT38 5TH CROSS GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. ... PETITIONER (BY … against whom decree of possession had been passed in O.S.Nos. 9077 of 1996 and 9078 of 1996, along with two other Judgment Debtors who were

Dr. Haniraj L. Chulani Vs. Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 16 to 28, 30, 33, 35, 36, 37, 42 and 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21; Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955; Bar Council of India Rules

Reported in : AIR1996SC1708; 1996(2)ALT31(SC); JT1996(4)SC162; (1996)3SCC342

of Maharashtra & Goa was justified in refusing enrolment of the appellant as an advocate under the Advocates Act, 1961 as he is a medical practitioner who does not want to give up his medical practice but wants … of advocates; Section 18 deals with the transfer of name of an advocate from one State to another; Section 19 enjoins upon every State Bar Council to send a copy of the roll of advocates to the Bar

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar … Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to