Advanced Search Results

Democratic Bar Association, Allahabad and Others Vs. High Court of Jud ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 16(1), (2) and (3), 17(1), (2) and (3), 17 to 27, 28, 34, 34(1) and 49; Designation of Senior Advocates Rules, 1999 - Rules 1, 2, 3, 3(A) and (B), 5, 9 and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 216, 217(2), 226, 233(2) and 235; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 237; Company Law Board (Procedure) Rules, 1964

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2383A; (2000)2UPLBEC1387

impugned Rules has no substance. This Court framed Rules under Section 34(1) read with Section 16(2) of the Advocate Act, 1961 on 28.2.1992 which were published in U.P. Gazette dated 9.5.1992. The authority of this Court to make Rules … filed a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith a certificate of registration of petitioner No. 1 under Societies Registration Act. 1860. which is Annexure-I to the supplementary affidavit. A certificate dated 1.8.1994 has also been filed to the effect

M. Veerabhadraiah Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Bengaluru, by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as “the Act”). A direction is also sought to frame rules for designation of senior … issued.13. With regard to notification dated 14/07/2014, by which respondent Nos.11 to 18 and respondent No.20 in W.P.No.36789/2014 were designated, it was on the basis … MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.36789/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) c/w W.P.No.35106/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P.No.36789/2014 BETWEEN: M. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT58YEARS, ADVOCATE, EN.NO.KAR/453/1986, HAVING OFFICE AT No.141, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 011. ...

Competition Commission of India and Anr vs.oriental Rubber Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the strength of this decision, he contended that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 was not an unqualified right and it may be restricted “by law for the time being in force.” … Pronounced on:24. 05.2018 LPA6072016, C.M. APPL.41020/2016 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.…. Appellants Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Balaji Subramanian, Sh. Udayan Verma and Sh. Siddharth Nath, Advocates. versus ORIENTAL RUBBER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED.... … their letter dated 04.06.2015 for inspection of records of the case.5. On 18.06.2015, the DG, in furtherance of the Notice dated 27.05.2015 rectified certain requirements

Sunanda Bhimrao Chaware and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Satya Narain vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225)to mean judicial service. The Advocates Act, 1961: 8. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for persons who may be admitted as advocates on … effect: “2) A candidate must be - (a) a holder of Degree in Law (b) practising as an Advocate in the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto for not less than seven years on the date of … Ayub S. Pathan v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Writ Petition 1849 of 2011 decided on 3 March 2011). The Division Bench noted that

S.Kasiramalingam Vs. the Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Right to Information

contemplated under Article 217(2)(b), by quoting Section 2(1)(a) of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 and the Advocates Act, 1961, as hereunder: "Meaning of the expression an advocate of a High Court in Article 217(2)(b) 52. The said … Supreme Court in the decision in Prof.Chandra Prakash Agarwal V. Chaturbuj Das Parikh reported in (1970) 1 SCC 182. 14.  The learned Senior Counsel replied to the submissions made by the learned impleading petitioner stating that the

R.D. Saxena Vs. Balram Prasad Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 36B and 38; Solicitors Act, 1860; Limitations of Actions Act, 1958; Constitution of India - Article 22(1); Constitution of India - Article 22(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148 and 171; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7), 76 to 123

Reported in : AIR2000SC3049; 2001ALLMR(Cri)375(SC); 2000(5)ALT1(SC); 2001(1)BLJR174; 2000(3)CTC757; JT2000(9)SC432; 2000(3)KLT438(SC); 2000MPLJ613(SC); 2000(6)SCALE42; (2000)7SCC264; [20; AIR 2000 SC 2912

issue, has chosen to impose punishment on a delinquent advocate debarring him from practicing for a period of 18 months and a fine of Rs. 1000/-. The advocate concerned was further directed to return all the case … - without any delay. This appeal is filed by the said advocate under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.2. As the question involved in this appeal has topical importance for the legal profession we heard learned Counsel

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

in parenthesis added by the Finance Act, 1985 introducing the following change in Section 136 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. April 1,1974 from which the CrPC, 1973 came into force. Section 28 of the Finance Act amended … to Section 40 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, Section 23 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and Section 18 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. These provisions which are almost similar provide that the Tribunal under … when you are required to appear either in person or by an Advocate to show cause, if any, why proceedings should not be initiated against

Belapur Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Farming Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 to 98; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom231; 1970MhLJ330

of sugarcane that the plaintiffs were cultivating the said lands. Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961, however, all surplus lands of the plaintiffs, i.e. lands in excess of the ceiling fixed in the manner … Statement which deals inter alia with paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by the learned Advocate General that the same has been denied in paragraph 27 of the plaint, it has been contended by … State Government, subject, of course, to payment of compensation as therein provided. Section 28 of the said Act which is important for the purpose of … of the surplus lands of the plaintiff-company, admeasuring about 11,393 acres and 18.5/8 gunthas, was given by it to the State Government on the 25th

Banshidhar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holding Act, 1973 - Sections 15, 15(2) and 40; Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 30E, 30E(1) and 30E(2); Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1977Raj46

Mr. Hastimal on Chief Inspector of Mines v. Karam Chand Thapar, AIR 1961 SC .838, South India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. Secy., Board of Revenue. … to intervene and he was permitted to address the Court. He supported the claims of the appellants. Learned Advocate-General assisted by Dr. S. K. Tewari, has very ably supported the stand taken by the State. It will … V.P. Tyagi, Actg. C.J. 1. These 27 special appeals arise out of the judgment of the learned single Judge D/-22-12-1975 whereby … the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. The Government while exercising its power under Section 257 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act framed rules known as the Rajasthan … Section 30 (j) was deleted with effect from 18-8-1970. The Parliament in order to avoid litigation between

The Sirsilk Limited Vs. the Distillery Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1979)2MLJ216

have further observed:The learned Counsel for the revenue sought to sustain Section 140-A (3) of the Act (Income-tax Act, 1961) on the ground that is a provision enabling coercive process for enforcement or effectuating the recovery of the … the Allahabad High Court in S.A. No. 177 of 1970.19. The learned Advocate-General did not advance any argument specifically regarding this ground. But he submitted … contends that the demand is illegal, ultra vires and liable to be struck down for the following reasons:(1) Section 18-A of the Madras Prohibition Act, 1937, enables the State Government to levy excise duty by notification from time