Advanced Search Results

B. Shivakumar Vs. Govt. of A.P., Law Department, Hyderabad and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 233(1 and 2); Advocate (Right to taking Law Teaching) Rules, 1979 - Rule 3; Bar Council of India Rules, 1961 - Rules 49, 51 and 70; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(A); University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD528; 1999(3)ALT389

filling up the application filed for appointment. He has also stated that under Section 49(A) of the Advocates Act 1961, (he Central Government framed the Rules called 'The Advocates (Right to take up law teaching) Rules 1979 which … of the recommendations by the High Court-2nd respondent as violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India besides violative of principles of … had obtained BL degree from Sri Venkateswara University in the year 1987. He got himself enrolled as an Advocate on the rolls of the A.P. State Bar Council on 24-4-1987. He started his practice in Kavali by

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

short, 'State Commission') are entitled to be represented by authorised agents who are not enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961 and such Authorised Agents have the right of audience. The counsel appearing for the parties confined their arguments … indicate that new Fora constituted under the Act of 1986 are quasi-judicial machineries and/or authorities and not, Courts. Section 14 of the Act of 1986 provides that after the proceedings are conducted under Section 13, if the District … the permission of the authority concerned, he does not practise the profession and contravene Section 33 of the Advocate Act. Section 32 of the said Act in fact permits such appearance notwithstanding the fact that the person concerned

Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Jal S ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2A), 3(27), 4(1), 7A, 10, 10(l), 10(4), 14 and 33(1); Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961 - Rules 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 22, 27, 28, 29 and 30; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1975; Gujarat Civil Services Rules (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1998; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(9); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 309

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2515

amendment to Section 14 by addition of sub-section (1-a) under the Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 being Act 23 of 1961. Sub-section (1-a) which is inserted in Section 14 entitles the State Government by … present petition on 17.6.86 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.Preliminary contention of Mr. Gopinath Amin, learned advocate for the respondent before the main contention raised by Mr. Chauhan, learned advocate on behalf of the petitioner:5.

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

advocate of a High Court' in Article 217(2)(b) have no significance after coming into force of the Advocates Act, 1961 ('1961 Act' for short), which lays down that, after the 1961 Act, there are only two classes of … is entitled as of right to practise in the High Court of which he is an Advocate, vide Section 14. Power is given by Section 15 to a Bar Council to make rules in respect of the rights

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar … Bar Council, after receipt of the complaint, by its communication No. KSBC/ 14/2002 dated 2-2-2002, has informed the petitioner herein about the filing of the

Sunanda Bhimrao Chaware and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Satya Narain vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225)to mean judicial service. The Advocates Act, 1961: 8. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for persons who may be admitted as advocates on … according to them, amounts to a hostile discrimination in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. According to the Petitioners, Article 233 of … effect: “2) A candidate must be - (a) a holder of Degree in Law (b) practising as an Advocate in the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto for not less than seven years on the date of

Jhaman Karamsingh Dadlani Vs. Ramanlal Maneklal Kantawala and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 229; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957 - Rule 623; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 - Rule 1; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 6; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1975Bom182; (1974)76BOMLR644

the said Rules being violative of Articles 14 and 19 thereof as also the provisions of the Advocates Act. 1961 . A writ directing Union Government to enforce Section 30 of the said Act said Act also is … Deshpande, J. 1. The petitioner, an advocate of this Court. seeks to challenge the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957, in this petition under

Bar Council of Gujarat Vs. Vinod Harjivandas Dixit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10-B, 14, 29 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 2 and 10; Gujarat Bar Council (Constitution and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11, 15(1), 28 and 49; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 233(2), 243-O and 243-ZB; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)A and 14; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 31;

Reported in : AIR2001Guj132; (2001)3GLR2280

shall be deemed to be vacated his office with effect from 22-7-2000 under Section 10B of the Advocates Act, 1961. The respondent challenged the process undertaken for the purpose of filling up the vacancy, by the letter of … such process cannot be called in question except by an election petition in the manner provided for in Section 14 of the Act and the High Court cannot entertain the petition in view of the bar imposed by … ceased to practise law and that he was not practising as an Advocate in any Court of India, forwarding his declaration and the original sanad

Peoples' Union for Liberties and others Vs. Union of India and others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1) and (2), 21, 32, 44, 226, 226(1), 226(2), 361, 358, 359, 363, 368, 368(2) and 369;; Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Sections 1, 1(2), 1(3), 3, 12(2)A, 11(1), 11(2), 13, 23, 23(1) and 25 ;; Advocate Act, 1961 - Section 30;; Prasar Bharti Act, 1990 - Sections 11, 23, and 25;; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976;; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 3(1), 4 and 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1996Cal89,100CWN357

of Aeltemesh Rein reported in AIR 1988 SC 1763. In the aforesaid decision S. 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 was not implemented for a long time. 26. The question involved in the aforesaid decision was if the … him it was held that'this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the writ. 14. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned Solicitor General has further … Vasant Kumar Pandit, petitioner v. Union of India and another, respondents reported in : 1982CriLJ340 (2) Aeltemish Rein, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, petitioner v. Union of India and others, Respondents reported in : 1988CriLJ1809 . 16. … notifications, or (iii) extending the operation of the Act or of any section thereof to different areas at different times by different notifications. 20. It

Joginder Singh Vs. the Bar Council of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 26(1) and 26(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 20(2);

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi192; 1975RLR15

practiced at Shaharanpur. He then applied to the Bar Council of India under section 18 of the Advocates Act 1961 for the transfer of his name from the roll of the U.P. Bar Council to that of the … T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) The appellant, Joginder Singh, was once an advocate. His grievance is that his name has been struck off the rolls. (2) On 28th March, 1962 he